Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
Geekbench lists an Intel Core i5-13600K with 14 cores and a clock speed of 5.1 GHz.
Today's Intel Raptor Lake benchmark leaks abound, and this time we're looking at two Core i5-13600K CPUs in two different motherboards.
The first CPU is housed on an ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Extreme motherboard and comes with 32 GB of DDR5 RAM. The second CPU is housed on an ASRock Z690 Steel Legend WiFi 6E motherboard, together with 32 GB of DDR4 memory. Both PCs are running Windows 10, and unlike the Core i9-13900K figures we saw a few weeks ago, Geekbench claims that these two findings are legitimate.
The i5-13600K has 14 cores and 20 threads. In order for this setup to function, only 6 Performance cores and one cluster of 8 Efficient cores are activated. It is too early to tell, however it is possible that this silicon is distinct from the 8P+16E type used by the 13900K.
According to the software's statistics, the CPU was operating at 4.3 to 5.09 GHz (ASRock) or 5.05 to 5.1 GHz (Gigabyte) (ASUS). This suggests that the later score was achieved using an overclocked system. The CPU scored 1980 and 2012 points in the single-core and 14425 and 16054 points in the multi-core tests, respectively. Using the higher score indicates that the CPU is up to 8% faster than its predecessor Core i5-12600K in single-core tests and up to 38% faster in multi-core tests. Compared to the AMD flagship Ryzen 5000 CPU with 16 cores (5950X), the i5-13600K may be 20% quicker in SC and around 3% slower in MT.
Intel Core i9-13900K Says Hi on Geekbench - 07/11/2022 08:18 PM
An engineer sample of Intel's forthcoming Raptor Lake Core i9-13900K has leaked on Geekbench. It's one of the ES samples that's been circulating recently, but this is the first time we've seen its...
Geekbench to conceal unreleased hardware benchmark results, bids farewell to leaks - 10/07/2021 09:48 AM
Geekbench's creator has opted to stop showing results for unreleased devices. That means Geekbench results for Alder Lake and future CPU architectures like Raptor Lake and Zen 4 will be a thing of th...
Geekbench score: Intel Core i9-12900K outperforms the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. - 08/27/2021 08:24 AM
A few days ago you have seen Intel Core i7-12700 appearing on Geekbench 5, where it competed and matches the AMD Ryzen 7 5800Xnow the Core i9-12900K has been spotted, the company's flagship processor...
Geekbench of Intel Core i7-12700 Matches the Ryzen 7 5800X - 08/25/2021 11:46 AM
AMD's Ryzen 7 5800X runs neck-and-neck with Intel's Core i7-12700 (non-K) processor in the Geekbench 5 benchmark. The i7-12700 has a 65 W TDP and comes with 8 "Golden Cove" P-cores and 4...
Intel Alder Lake desktop CPU spotted in Geekbench - 12/30/2020 08:36 AM
Rocket Lake desktop CPUs will arrive first, but Intel had already announced in the summer that the next generation “Alder Lake” will follow in autumn 2021. This desktop CPU is based on a hybrid ar...
stampedeadam
Junior Member
Posts: 18
Joined: 2020-10-12
Junior Member
Posts: 18
Joined: 2020-10-12
#6035844 Posted on: 07/21/2022 08:50 PM
This is what Intel are capable of, and what they've done before (think Core 2 and Sandy Bridge releases) - but they have to be forced into doing it. I just hope that Zen 4 is really good otherwise Intel will spend years sandbagging again.
This is what Intel are capable of, and what they've done before (think Core 2 and Sandy Bridge releases) - but they have to be forced into doing it. I just hope that Zen 4 is really good otherwise Intel will spend years sandbagging again.
heffeque
Senior Member
Posts: 4203
Joined: 2003-03-03
Senior Member
Posts: 4203
Joined: 2003-03-03
#6035852 Posted on: 07/21/2022 09:09 PM
Lets see how many watts it consumes.
An 8% to 38% performance increase with (for example) a 50% power usage increase... would not be a good thing at all.
Lets see.
Lets see how many watts it consumes.
An 8% to 38% performance increase with (for example) a 50% power usage increase... would not be a good thing at all.
Lets see.
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 1401
Joined: 2014-07-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1401
Joined: 2014-07-22
#6035874 Posted on: 07/21/2022 11:19 PM
The 5950 being much older ripped it on multi-core performance. But, it seems these days all we get are leaked benchmarks for Intel.
The 5950 being much older ripped it on multi-core performance. But, it seems these days all we get are leaked benchmarks for Intel.
Agonist
Senior Member
Posts: 3808
Joined: 2008-10-13
Senior Member
Posts: 3808
Joined: 2008-10-13
#6035947 Posted on: 07/22/2022 03:07 AM
Drugs are bad. Intel hasnt been sandbagging since Zen 1 launched 5 years ago.
And anyone getting hard off of Intels leaked geekbench scores is a max level fangirl clown.
This is what Intel are capable of, and what they've done before (think Core 2 and Sandy Bridge releases) - but they have to be forced into doing it. I just hope that Zen 4 is really good otherwise Intel will spend years sandbagging again.
Drugs are bad. Intel hasnt been sandbagging since Zen 1 launched 5 years ago.
And anyone getting hard off of Intels leaked geekbench scores is a max level fangirl clown.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 761
Joined: 2011-05-02
Fecken hell lol.
Sure looks good in synthetics hat off.