Team Group MP34 NVME SSD (512GB) review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Gaming OC review
Anno 1800: PC graphics performance benchmark review
NZXT H500 Overwatch Special Edition review
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Twin Fan 6 GB Review
Corsair Carbide 275Q review
Cooler Master MK850 keyboard review
WD Blue SN500 NVME SSD (250GB) Review
ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme Alpha review
Core i9-9900K and i7-9700K turbo clocks revealed - 4.7 GHz with all eight cores
Some Intel documentation surfaced on the pending Core i9 9900K and i7 9700K, while most information was already publicly available, the slides also show the various turbo clock frequencies, and they certainly are interesting.
The Core i7 9700K is an eight-core and eight-thread processor (that's right no Hyper threading) with a boost up to 4.9 GHz on one single-core. However, it can turbo at 4.6 GHz maximum on all cores.
Intel's soon the be most high-end desktop processor the Core i9-9900K is the same 8-core part, yet now with HyperThreading enabled (16-threads). This processor has some interesting stuff, it can do 5.0 GHz on a single and dual-core turbo frequency. Also really interesting, it'll do a boost up to 4.7 GHz on all cores. That's pretty huge, to be honest. Let's hope the leaked slides are actually valid ones, the originate from PTT(Benchlife).
Intel Core i9-9900K, i7-9700K and i5-9600K to launch in October - 08/01/2018 02:19 PM
Alright, one more on Intel for today, I promise. Yet another and more recent roadmap leaked onto the web. The presentation slide seems _very_ Intel, ergo I have confidence that this is the real deal....
Core i9-9900K 8-core Will have Soldered Heatspreader - 07/26/2018 06:29 AM
You know that Intel eight-core Core i9-9900K that is coming. Word out on the street is that Intel has been shipping some samples to overclockers. And as they found out, the 8-core parts do not use the...
Intel Core i9-9900K, i7-9700K, i5-9600K specifications exposed (updated) - 07/25/2018 03:49 PM
A little while ago we reported that Intel is to release three new three CPU SKUs. An 8-core, 16-thread CPU (Core i9 9900K); a 6c/12t one (Core i7 9700K) and a 6c/6t part (Core i5 9600K )....
Intel Six Core Mobile Core i9-8950HK, i7-8850H, i7-8750H Cinebench scores leaked - 03/16/2018 05:21 PM
We've been hearing quite a lot about hexacore processors reaching laptops anytime soon, the most prominent proc mentioned would be the Core i9 8950K, these and others now have been spotted, and that...
Core i9-7980XE 18-core Benchmarks - 09/20/2017 08:52 AM
It's has been quiet with X299 and the Skylake-X platform processors. We've seen the 10-core review, the 12-core parts in stores but other then that it remains silent. However in Asia a website leake...
moeppel
Senior Member
Posts: 141
Joined: 2015-06-30
Senior Member
Posts: 141
Joined: 2015-06-30
#5572905 Posted on: 08/11/2018 07:58 PM
That's not going to be 95W and it's likely going to quite a chunk above $300.
Wonder if this is the end of the road for Intel, assuming Zen 2 will arrive as scheduled - only of course if it'll be able to encroach towards the mid 4ghz as well.
That's not going to be 95W and it's likely going to quite a chunk above $300.
Wonder if this is the end of the road for Intel, assuming Zen 2 will arrive as scheduled - only of course if it'll be able to encroach towards the mid 4ghz as well.
wavetrex
Senior Member
Posts: 457
Joined: 2008-07-16
Senior Member
Posts: 457
Joined: 2008-07-16
#5572907 Posted on: 08/11/2018 08:17 PM
Fake.
We'll be lucky if it does 4.0 all cores, and that with some beefy cooling, and not in SSE jobs, which will throttle to 3.8 or something.
Magic doesn't happen overnight; changing a number from 7 to 9 is insufficient. Needs more Faery dust for that.
Fake.
We'll be lucky if it does 4.0 all cores, and that with some beefy cooling, and not in SSE jobs, which will throttle to 3.8 or something.
Magic doesn't happen overnight; changing a number from 7 to 9 is insufficient. Needs more Faery dust for that.
Strange Times
Member
Posts: 78
Joined: 2018-08-05
Member
Posts: 78
Joined: 2018-08-05
#5572909 Posted on: 08/11/2018 08:26 PM
yeah another fake tdp from intel
yeah another fake tdp from intel
RzrTrek
Senior Member
Posts: 2114
Joined: 2012-04-16
Senior Member
Posts: 2114
Joined: 2012-04-16
#5572910 Posted on: 08/11/2018 08:49 PM
Ryzen giving Intel another panic attack?
Ryzen giving Intel another panic attack?
Yogi
Senior Member
Posts: 207
Joined: 2015-06-25
Senior Member
Posts: 207
Joined: 2015-06-25
#5572916 Posted on: 08/11/2018 09:08 PM
Still can't believe that an i7-k processor doesn't have hyperthreading.
Still can't believe that an i7-k processor doesn't have hyperthreading.
TLD LARS
Member
Posts: 74
Joined: 2017-03-01
Member
Posts: 74
Joined: 2017-03-01
#5572919 Posted on: 08/11/2018 09:24 PM
It is too good to be called a i5, but it is not good enough to be called a i9, so it cant really be named anything else then i7.
I would guess it would be faster then a i7 8700k and i7 7820x, if it is able to run at the clocks described here, so it is really closer to the i9 labeling then i5.
Still can't believe that an i7-k processor doesn't have hyperthreading.
It is too good to be called a i5, but it is not good enough to be called a i9, so it cant really be named anything else then i7.
I would guess it would be faster then a i7 8700k and i7 7820x, if it is able to run at the clocks described here, so it is really closer to the i9 labeling then i5.
nevcairiel
Senior Member
Posts: 462
Joined: 2015-05-19
Senior Member
Posts: 462
Joined: 2015-05-19
#5572920 Posted on: 08/11/2018 09:26 PM
TDP has always been specified for running at base clocks only. Turbos are not guaranteed if your board and cooling cannot sustain them. So yeah, it'll use more then 95W if your cooling and power delivery can keep up with that. But all CPUs always have.
Ryzen will also exceed the 95W rating.
That's not going to be 95W
TDP has always been specified for running at base clocks only. Turbos are not guaranteed if your board and cooling cannot sustain them. So yeah, it'll use more then 95W if your cooling and power delivery can keep up with that. But all CPUs always have.
Ryzen will also exceed the 95W rating.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 3778
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 3778
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5572922 Posted on: 08/11/2018 09:43 PM
*sigh*
People here really need to remember that the TDP rating is based on base clocks. Intel isn't claiming 95W at 4.7Ghz, that's absurd.
Also, since these are supposed to use real TIM for the IHS, 4.7GHz on all cores with a modest air cooler should be achievable.
I avoid Intel wherever justifiable, but damn, some of you people are so caught up in hating them that you don't realize how ridiculous you sound.
*sigh*
People here really need to remember that the TDP rating is based on base clocks. Intel isn't claiming 95W at 4.7Ghz, that's absurd.
Also, since these are supposed to use real TIM for the IHS, 4.7GHz on all cores with a modest air cooler should be achievable.
I avoid Intel wherever justifiable, but damn, some of you people are so caught up in hating them that you don't realize how ridiculous you sound.
nizzen
Senior Member
Posts: 592
Joined: 2005-08-05
Senior Member
Posts: 592
Joined: 2005-08-05
#5572924 Posted on: 08/11/2018 09:56 PM
*sigh*
People here really need to remember that the TDP rating is based on base clocks. Intel isn't claiming 95W at 4.7Ghz, that's absurd.
Also, since these are supposed to use real TIM for the IHS, 4.7GHz on all cores with a modest air cooler should be achievable.
I avoid Intel wherever justifiable, but damn, some of you people are so caught up in hating them that you don't realize how ridiculous you sound.
Well that's guru3d forums anno 2018...
Nice to see competition doing wonders for us who love hardware
*sigh*
People here really need to remember that the TDP rating is based on base clocks. Intel isn't claiming 95W at 4.7Ghz, that's absurd.
Also, since these are supposed to use real TIM for the IHS, 4.7GHz on all cores with a modest air cooler should be achievable.
I avoid Intel wherever justifiable, but damn, some of you people are so caught up in hating them that you don't realize how ridiculous you sound.
Well that's guru3d forums anno 2018...
Nice to see competition doing wonders for us who love hardware
nizzen
Senior Member
Posts: 592
Joined: 2005-08-05
Senior Member
Posts: 592
Joined: 2005-08-05
#5572926 Posted on: 08/11/2018 09:57 PM
Yet another epic fail post....
yeah another fake tdp from intel
Yet another epic fail post....
JamesSneed
Senior Member
Posts: 452
Joined: 2017-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 452
Joined: 2017-02-14
#5572943 Posted on: 08/12/2018 12:03 AM
*sigh*
People here really need to remember that the TDP rating is based on base clocks. Intel isn't claiming 95W at 4.7Ghz, that's absurd.
Also, since these are supposed to use real TIM for the IHS, 4.7GHz on all cores with a modest air cooler should be achievable.
I avoid Intel wherever justifiable, but damn, some of you people are so caught up in hating them that you don't realize how ridiculous you sound.
You have a point but Intel is also being misleading in regards to TDP's. The entire point of TDP's was so that vendors could determine proper cooling solutions. When you are selling products that boost clocks, you at min should publish the all core boost TDP since that is something that will occur when simply using the CPU as intended. You will certainly need a better cooling solution than dissipating 95W.
I think these are going to be damn good CPU's by the way. No Intel hate here.
*sigh*
People here really need to remember that the TDP rating is based on base clocks. Intel isn't claiming 95W at 4.7Ghz, that's absurd.
Also, since these are supposed to use real TIM for the IHS, 4.7GHz on all cores with a modest air cooler should be achievable.
I avoid Intel wherever justifiable, but damn, some of you people are so caught up in hating them that you don't realize how ridiculous you sound.
You have a point but Intel is also being misleading in regards to TDP's. The entire point of TDP's was so that vendors could determine proper cooling solutions. When you are selling products that boost clocks, you at min should publish the all core boost TDP since that is something that will occur when simply using the CPU as intended. You will certainly need a better cooling solution than dissipating 95W.
I think these are going to be damn good CPU's by the way. No Intel hate here.
Venix
Senior Member
Posts: 705
Joined: 2016-08-01
Senior Member
Posts: 705
Joined: 2016-08-01
#5572950 Posted on: 08/12/2018 01:31 AM
if they keep their current "stock" cooler those turbos will be just a distant dream
that said i guess thats why they sholder so they can push their cpus close to their limit leaving only 300-500 mhz headroom for oc like ryzen
if they keep their current "stock" cooler those turbos will be just a distant dream
that said i guess thats why they sholder so they can push their cpus close to their limit leaving only 300-500 mhz headroom for oc like ryzen
nz3777
Senior Member
Posts: 2310
Joined: 2014-01-21
Senior Member
Posts: 2310
Joined: 2014-01-21
#5572952 Posted on: 08/12/2018 01:40 AM
There's room for both I dont hate either camp.Just remember intel has been top-dog for so long now and finally Amd stepping it up might of throw them off there game for a little bit but they will be just fine I think. Both companys need each other and bring out the best in one another I think.
I started a new build based on Ryzen iam proud to say but I would never turn down team blue if I had the xtra $$$.
There's room for both I dont hate either camp.Just remember intel has been top-dog for so long now and finally Amd stepping it up might of throw them off there game for a little bit but they will be just fine I think. Both companys need each other and bring out the best in one another I think.
I started a new build based on Ryzen iam proud to say but I would never turn down team blue if I had the xtra $$$.
Ssateneth
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: 2007-02-20
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: 2007-02-20
#5572954 Posted on: 08/12/2018 01:45 AM
lol what? i havent seen a single ryzen chip going above 85c even overclocked. meanwhile intel consistently going 90-100c
Bye bye overheated ryzen cpu,s. with full of hardware related problems.
lol what? i havent seen a single ryzen chip going above 85c even overclocked. meanwhile intel consistently going 90-100c
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 360
Joined: 2017-02-04
Benchlife...more like get a life...Benchlife in all kinds of violations....