ASUS STRIX B550-I Gaming review
Kioxia Exceria 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD review
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - June 2020
ASUS ROG Strix Z490-E Gaming review
MSI MEG Z490 Godlike review
TeamGroup Cardea Zero Z340 M.2 NVMe review
AMD Ryzen RAM scaling - performance effect in games
Elgato WAVE:3 review
Gigabyte B550i Aorus PRO AX review
Call of Duty Ghosts PC graphics card performance benchmarks
We review and benchmark Call of Duty Ghosts for PC in collaboration with close to 20 graphics cards being tested. Despite limitations and odd and off results we wanted to show you how graphics cards scale at some really good image qyality settings. As such we'll take roughly twenty graphics cards today and have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. The new and popular title is looking great from a graphics point of view.
You can read the entire article right here.
Bypass Call of Duty Ghosts Memory 6GB requirement. - 11/06/2013 10:16 AM
As many of you probaly noticed, there is a unofficial 'patch' for Call of Duty Ghosts that allows PC users with at least 4GB of RAM to play Call of Duty: Ghosts and bypass the 6GB memory requiremen...
Official Call of Duty: Ghosts Live-Action Trailer - 11/04/2013 09:32 AM
The official Call of Duty: Ghosts live action trailer, directed by James Mangold and featuring Megan Fox, follows four buddies on the trip of a lifetime through Las Vegas and beyond. Call of Duty: Gho...
Call of Duty:Ghosts Official Minimum Specs - 10/24/2013 09:41 AM
Here are the minimum system requirements for Call of Duty: Ghosts on the PC! You will need at least 6GB of RAM, 40GB of free HDD and a 64bit OS to run it. Call of Duty: Ghosts Minimum Requirements: ...
Nvidia Outs Call of Duty: Ghosts System Specs and they are HEAVY - 10/08/2013 04:06 PM
Interesting, Nvidia announce the pending Call of Duty: Ghosts System Specs requirements. And they are stringent alright. Call of Duty: Ghosts will be released November 5th and will run on 64-bit o...
Call of Duty: Ghosts - Squads Trailer - 10/04/2013 09:16 AM
experience with cutting edge AI, Squads lets you play a variety of new game modes with your customized squad-mates. Play solo against another player and their squad, or cooperatively with friends, com...
Slikar
Senior Member
Posts: 368
Joined: 2012-08-22
Senior Member
Posts: 368
Joined: 2012-08-22
#4694638 Posted on: 11/06/2013 04:34 PM
What is this? Titan and 290x on 1600x1200 not even 60fps
nice job IW , nice job..
What is this? Titan and 290x on 1600x1200 not even 60fps
nice job IW , nice job..
moab600
Senior Member
Posts: 6199
Joined: 2004-09-30
Senior Member
Posts: 6199
Joined: 2004-09-30
#4694639 Posted on: 11/06/2013 04:34 PM
game is such unoptimized horrible performance, this game should be banned from PC until they fix it.
game is such unoptimized horrible performance, this game should be banned from PC until they fix it.
CrazY_Milojko
Senior Member
Posts: 1992
Joined: 2013-02-26
Senior Member
Posts: 1992
Joined: 2013-02-26
#4694650 Posted on: 11/06/2013 04:44 PM
Nice review Hilbert, but I have one question: GeForce GTX 690 results are there, but where are Radeon HD 7990 results?
Edit:
My bad, I've missed that: "...The mighty Radeon HD 7990 caves in, Crossfire did not kick in...". ...because I was probably shocked by low fps results on high-end Radeon cards.
Edit #2:
I've loled so hard after closer look @ results because I was not looking below 7970.
1600x1200 GTX 660 = 41 / R9 290X = 51
1920x1200 GTX 660 = 37 / R9 290X = 51
2560x1440 GTX 660 = 30 / R9 290X = 45
R9 290X could easily obliterate my GTX 660 in any game today, it's obvius that NVidia's money is drilling holes everywhere they can, "good job" NVidia, but you can go to hell as far as I'm concerned, my next card probably will be from 79xx/R9-280X series... Hope that new Radeon drivers will improve performance in CoD:Ghosts for Radeon 78xx/79xx/R9 2xx cards, but after all who cares about CoD games on PC anymore.
Nice review Hilbert, but I have one question: GeForce GTX 690 results are there, but where are Radeon HD 7990 results?
Edit:
My bad, I've missed that: "...The mighty Radeon HD 7990 caves in, Crossfire did not kick in...". ...because I was probably shocked by low fps results on high-end Radeon cards.
Edit #2:
I've loled so hard after closer look @ results because I was not looking below 7970.
1600x1200 GTX 660 = 41 / R9 290X = 51
1920x1200 GTX 660 = 37 / R9 290X = 51
2560x1440 GTX 660 = 30 / R9 290X = 45
R9 290X could easily obliterate my GTX 660 in any game today, it's obvius that NVidia's money is drilling holes everywhere they can, "good job" NVidia, but you can go to hell as far as I'm concerned, my next card probably will be from 79xx/R9-280X series... Hope that new Radeon drivers will improve performance in CoD:Ghosts for Radeon 78xx/79xx/R9 2xx cards, but after all who cares about CoD games on PC anymore.
cowie
Senior Member
Posts: 13235
Joined: 2005-03-30
Senior Member
Posts: 13235
Joined: 2005-03-30
#4694652 Posted on: 11/06/2013 04:46 PM
hell i could still be on a 680 if a played this game,whats wrong with that?
A 250usd card plays it as well as a 1000usd card. Thats a game that is for the masses not like the other shooter game that came out just the other day
game is such unoptimized horrible performance, this game should be banned from PC until they fix it.
hell i could still be on a 680 if a played this game,whats wrong with that?
A 250usd card plays it as well as a 1000usd card. Thats a game that is for the masses not like the other shooter game that came out just the other day
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Posts: 9094
Joined: 2010-11-10
Cheers Hilbert, awesome write up.
I still think nvidia and IW missed an opportunity to ship retail pc versions in a fur covered dvd case and then, when you open it, random crap falls out onto the ground representing PhysX.. well thats probably more gravity and an annoying mess to clean up... but its still be better than 'John Romero is going to make you his b***h' advertising campaign.