Backblaze Published Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2019
As of March 31, 2019, Backblaze had 106,238 spinning hard drives in our cloud storage ecosystem spread across three data centers. Of that number, there were 1,913 boot drives and 104,325 data drives.
This review looks at the Q1 2019 and lifetime hard drive failure rates of the data drive models currently in operation in our data centers and provides a handful of insights and observations along the way.
Hard Drive Failure Stats for Q1 2019
At the end of Q1 2019, Backblaze was using 104,325 hard drives to store data. For our evaluation we remove from consideration those drives that were used for testing purposes and those drive models for which we did not have at least 45 drives (see why below). This leaves us with 104,130 hard drives. The table below covers what happened in Q1 2019.
Notes and Observations
If a drive model has a failure rate of 0%, it means there were no drive failures of that model during Q1 2019. The two drives listed with zero failures in Q1 were the 4 TB and 5 TB Toshiba models. Neither has a large enough number of drive days to be statistically significant, but in the case of the 5 TB model, you have to go back to Q2 2016 to find the last drive failure we had of that model.
There were 195 drives (104,325 minus 104,130) that were not included in the list above because they were used as testing drives or we did not have at least 45 of a given drive model. We use 45 drives of the same model as the minimum number when we report quarterly, yearly, and lifetime drive statistics. The use of 45 drives is historical in nature as that was the number of drives in our original Storage Pods. Beginning next quarter that threshold will change; we'll get to that shortly.
The Annualized Failure Rate (AFR) for Q1 is 1.56%. That's as high as the quarterly rate has been since Q4 2017 and its part of an overall upward trend we've seen in the quarterly failure rates over the last few quarters. Let's take a closer look.
Quarterly Trends
We noted in previous reports that using the quarterly reports is useful in spotting trends about a particular drive or even a manufacturer. Still, you need to have enough data (drive count and drive days) in each observed period (quarter) to make any analysis valid. To that end the chart below uses quarterly data from Seagate and HGST drives while leaving out Toshiba and WDC drives as we don't have enough drives from those manufacturers over the course of the last three years.
Over the last three years, the trend for both Seagate and HGST annualized failure rates had improved, i.e. gone down. While Seagate has reduced their failure rate over 50% during that time, the upward trend over the last three quarters requires some consideration. We'll take a look at this and let you know if we find anything interesting in a future post.
Changing the Qualification Threshold
As reported over the last several quarters, we've been migrating from lower density drives, 2, 3, and 4 TB drives, to larger 10, 12, and 14 TB hard drives. At the same time, we have been replacing our stand-alone 45-drive Storage Pods with 60-drive Storage Pods arranged into the Backblaze Vault configuration of 20 Storage Pods per vault. In Q1, the last stand-alone 45-drive Storage Pod was retired. Therefore, using 45 drives as the threshold for qualification to our quarterly report seems antiquated. This is a good time to switch to using Drive Days as the qualification criteria. In reviewing our data, we have decided to use 5,000 Drive Days as the threshold going forward. The exception, any current drives we are reporting, such as the Toshiba 5 TB model with about 4,000 hours each quarter, will continue to be included in our Hard Drive Stats reports.
Fewer Drives = More Data
Those of you who follow our quarterly reports might have observed that the total number of hard drives in service decreased in Q1 by 648 drives compared to Q4 2018, yet we added nearly 60 petabytes of storage. You can see what changed in the chart below.
Lifetime Hard Drive Stats
The table below shows the lifetime failure rates for the hard drive models we had in service as of March 31, 2019. This is over the period beginning in April 2013 and ending March 31, 2019.
2018 HDD Failure rates report from Backblaze - 01/24/2019 08:58 AM
Backblaze has published its annual hard drive statistics in which the company shares numbers on failure rates of the nearly 105,000 the company has in its data centers. The company publishes the annua...
Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for Q3 2018 - 10/18/2018 08:48 AM
As of September 30, 2018 Backblaze had 99,636 spinning hard drives. Of that number, there were 1,866 boot drives and 97,770 data drives. This review looks at the quarterly and lifetime statistics for ...
BACKBLAZE Releases HDD Stats for Q2 2018 - 07/25/2018 04:49 PM
As of June 30, 2018 they had 100,254 spinning hard drives in Backblaze’s data centers. Of that number, there were 1,989 boot drives and 98,265 data drives. This review looks at the quarterly...
Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2018 Have Been published - 4TB HGST HDDs Very Reliable - 05/03/2018 07:37 AM
It is always fun to check this list out, as of March 31, 2018 they had 100,110 spinning hard drives. Of that number, there were 1,922 boot drives and 98,188 data drives. This review looks at the quar...
Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for 2017 - HGST HDDs Very Reliable - 02/02/2018 10:13 AM
Backblaze has recorded and saved daily hard drive statistics from the drives in their data centers and released the statistics for the year 2017. At the end of 2017 they had 93,240 spinning hard driv...
Senior Member
Posts: 813
Joined: 2009-11-30
I really like these statistics and they give a really great insight into HDD longevity and durability..
'but' (and it is a little one in the grand scheme of things) to the common 'home' user that turns their computer on daily or 3 times a week.. what I would like to know is which HDD's handle prolonged 'hot and cold cycles' the best.
If I bought 2 HGST and put them in basic software mirror and only turned my 'home' PC on sporadically, how long could I realistically trust them not to lose my family photo/video collection?
Perhaps they could arrange something when they next decommission some of the superior drives, stick them on a HDD shelf that powers up occasionally, writes a few GB and powers off.. and see if useful life drops off a cliff or they really are bullet proof.
to be honest their data is not much helpful, because most all their drive is enterprise-drive... not consumer drive
and not sure if there relation to data-center workload that not intended for the drive, the consumer drive they using on their datacenter (WDC Red WD60EFRX) got high failure rate at 3.8%
now just check what ur HGST model, if u using same model like theirs, most pc shop dont sell enterprise drive often
if u want to fail-proof ur data, replace drive that out of warranty (2-3years) even there is no issue whatsover, so in average hours it around 26000hours
reason : based google storage report, failure rate getting up after 3years, and manufacture warranty = test by the manufacture that the product should at-least working without problem within warranty period, even it can last much longer (or shorter) in reality
and also, by replacing the drive, if u keep the old-drive, means u have archive-drive, that incase there is castathropic-failure (raid failure etc.)... archive drive will be ur recovery point
if u want carefree, just rent for cloud-storage, u might paid more, but u dont need to worry about hdd failure
Senior Member
Posts: 15400
Joined: 2018-03-21
>to be honest their data is not much helpful, because most all their drive is enterprise-drive... not consumer drive
you wut?
backblaze is well known for using consumer drives rather than enterprise.
Senior Member
Posts: 225
Joined: 2019-04-15
12TB drives are not consumer grade and that's what they are migrating to based on this report. Consumer grade are more like 2 and 3TB, maybe 4 at the most.
Manufacturer warranty periods are not determined by testing because the products are released before that much test data is acquired. They don't have three and four year product cycles. They are more like one year, maximum. The warranty periods are mostly extrapolations based on previous products and hopes that they can maintain those reliability levels even at higher densities.
Senior Member
Posts: 501
Joined: 2001-05-02
12TB drives are not consumer grade and that's what they are migrating to based on this report. Consumer grade are more like 2 and 3TB, maybe 4 at the most.
Manufacturer warranty periods are not determined by testing because the products are released before that much test data is acquired. They don't have three and four year product cycles. They are more like one year, maximum. The warranty periods are mostly extrapolations based on previous products and hopes that they can maintain those reliability levels even at higher densities.
You know that the Seagate Drive are mix of Consumer/Enterprise grade drive
DM are Consumer, DX and NM are Enterprise
You don't see any WDC, HGST and Toshiba Consumer grade drive as it prove just how bad there are in real world test in fact WDC is all ready pulling it self of Backblaze
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: 2011-03-09
I really like these statistics and they give a really great insight into HDD longevity and durability..
'but' (and it is a little one in the grand scheme of things) to the common 'home' user that turns their computer on daily or 3 times a week.. what I would like to know is which HDD's handle prolonged 'hot and cold cycles' the best.
If I bought 2 HGST and put them in basic software mirror and only turned my 'home' PC on sporadically, how long could I realistically trust them not to lose my family photo/video collection?
Perhaps they could arrange something when they next decommission some of the superior drives, stick them on a HDD shelf that powers up occasionally, writes a few GB and powers off.. and see if useful life drops off a cliff or they really are bullet proof.