Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASRock Z590 Extreme review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC review
Corsair K70 RGB TKL keyboard review
Corsair RM650x (2021) power supply review
be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280mm review
Corsair K55 RGB PRO XT keyboard review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - March 2021
Intel Core i9-11900K processor review
Intel Core i5-11600K processor review
ASUS ROG Maximus XIII HERO review

New Downloads
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.2 Beta 2
MSI Afterburner 4.6.4 Beta 2 Download
HWiNFO Download v7.02
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9316
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.9.350
Quake II RTX Download 1.5.0
GeForce 465.89 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.33
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.3.2 driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.8


New Forum Topics
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G processor (APU) gets tested and photographed Review: Gigabyte Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC Review: ASRock Z590 Extreme If Noctua had made a GPU Cooler... MSI To release two super fast NVMe SSDs - Gen 4x4 and Read and Writes up-to 7000 MB/s NVIDIA Announces Grace CPU for Giant AI and High Performance Computing Workloads AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.3.2 driver download & discussion Age of Empires 4 makes a return with new gameplay and imagery Need ppl with 1440p 144hz+ and Warhammertotalwar 2 to troubleshoot microstutter issue Asus to release resizable BAR update for Z370 and Z390 motherboards in May




Guru3D.com » News » Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2018 Have Been published - 4TB HGST HDDs Very Reliable

Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2018 Have Been published - 4TB HGST HDDs Very Reliable

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 05/03/2018 07:37 AM | source: | 3 comment(s)
Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2018 Have Been published - 4TB HGST HDDs Very Reliable

It is always fun to check this list out, as of March 31, 2018 they had 100,110 spinning hard drives. Of that number, there were 1,922 boot drives and 98,188 data drives. This review looks at the quarterly and lifetime statistics for the data drive models in operation in their data centers. 

We’ll also take a look at why we are collecting and reporting 10 new SMART attributes and take a sneak peek at some 8 TB Toshiba drives.

Background

Since April 2013, Backblaze has recorded and saved daily hard drive statistics from the drives in our data centers. Each entry consists of the date, manufacturer, model, serial number, status (operational or failed), and all of the SMART attributes reported by that drive. Currently there are about 97 million entries totaling 26 GB of data. 

Hard Drive Reliability Statistics for Q1 2018

At the end of Q1 2018 Backblaze was monitoring 98,188 hard drives used to store data. For our evaluation below we remove from consideration those drives which were used for testing purposes and those drive models for which we did not have at least 45 drives. This leaves us with 98,046 hard drives. The table below covers just Q1 2018.

Notes and Observations

If a drive model has a failure rate of 0%, it only means there were no drive failures of that model during Q1 2018. The overall Annualized Failure Rate (AFR) for Q1 is just 1.2%, well below the Q4 2017 AFR of 1.65%. Remember that quarterly failure rates can be volatile, especially for models that have a small number of drives and/or a small number of Drive Days.

There were 142 drives (98,188 minus 98,046) that were not included in the list above because we did not have at least 45 of a given drive model. We use 45 drives of the same model as the minimum number when we report quarterly, yearly, and lifetime drive statistics.

Welcome Toshiba 8TB drives, almost…

We mentioned Toshiba 8 TB drives in the first paragraph, but they don’t show up in the Q1 Stats chart. What gives? We only had 20 of the Toshiba 8 TB drives in operation in Q1, so they were excluded from the chart. Why do we have only 20 drives? When we test out a new drive model we start with the “tome test” and it takes 20 drives to fill one tome. A tome is the same drive model in the same logical position in each of the 20 Storage Pods that make up a Backblaze Vault. There are 60 tomes in each vault.

In this test, we created a Backblaze Vault of 8 TB drives, with 59 of the tomes being Seagate 8 TB drives and 1 tome being the Toshiba drives. Then we monitored the performance of the vault and its member tomes to see if, in this case, the Toshiba drives performed as expected.

So far the Toshiba drive is performing fine, but they have been in place for only 20 days. Next up is the “pod test” where we fill a Storage Pod with Toshiba drives and integrate it into a Backblaze Vault comprised of like-sized drives. We hope to have a better look at the Toshiba 8 TB drives in our Q2 report — stay tuned.

Lifetime Hard Drive Reliability Statistics

While the quarterly chart presented earlier gets a lot of interest, the real test of any drive model is over time. Below is the lifetime failure rate chart for all the hard drive models which have 45 or more drives in operation as of March 31st, 2018. For each model, we compute their reliability starting from when they were first installed.

Notes and Observations

The failure rates of all of the larger drives (8-, 10- and 12 TB) are very good, 1.2% AFR (Annualized Failure Rate) or less. Many of these drives were deployed in the last year, so there is some volatility in the data, but you can use the Confidence Interval to get a sense of the failure percentage range.

The overall failure rate of 1.84% is the lowest we have ever achieved, besting the previous low of 2.00% from the end of 2017.

Our regular readers and drive stats wonks may have noticed a sizable jump in the number of HGST 8 TB drives (model: HUH728080ALE600), from 45 last quarter to 1,045 this quarter. As the 10 TB and 12 TB drives become more available, the price per terabyte of the 8 TB drives has gone down. This presented an opportunity to purchase the HGST drives at a price in line with our budget.

We purchased and placed into service the 45 original HGST 8 TB drives in Q2 of 2015. They were our first Helium-filled drives and our only ones until the 10 TB and 12 TB Seagate drives arrived in Q3 2017. We’ll take a first look into whether or not Helium makes a difference in drive failure rates in an upcoming blog post.

New SMART Attributes

If you have previously worked with the hard drive stats data or plan to, you’ll notice that we added 10 more columns of data starting in 2018. There are 5 new SMART attributes we are tracking each with a raw and normalized value:

  • 177 – Wear Range Delta
  • 179 – Used Reserved Block Count Total
  • 181- Program Fail Count Total or Non-4K Aligned Access Count
  • 182 – Erase Fail Count
  • 235 – Good Block Count AND System(Free) Block Count

The 5 values are all related to SSD drives.

Yes, SSD drives, but before you jump to any conclusions, we used 10 Samsung 850 EVO SSDs as boot drives for a period of time in Q1. This was an experiment to see if we could reduce boot up time for the Storage Pods. In our case, the improved boot up speed wasn’t worth the SSD cost, but it did add 10 new columns to the hard drive stats data.



Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2018 Have Been published - 4TB HGST HDDs Very Reliable Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2018 Have Been published - 4TB HGST HDDs Very Reliable Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2018 Have Been published - 4TB HGST HDDs Very Reliable




« Researcher Demonstrates USB Stick That Can BSOD Any Windows 10 Device Even If Locked · Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2018 Have Been published - 4TB HGST HDDs Very Reliable · Big Vulnerability hits 7-Zip file archiver - gets patched - Download v18.05 »

Related Stories

Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for 2017 - HGST HDDs Very Reliable - 02/02/2018 10:13 AM
Backblaze has recorded and saved daily hard drive statistics from the drives in their data centers and released the statistics for the year 2017. At the end of 2017 they had 93,240 spinning hard driv...

Backblaze on HAMR HDD Technology - 12/18/2017 10:07 AM
In Q4 Backblaze deployed 100 petabytes worth of Seagate hard drives to their data centers. The newly deployed Seagate 10 and 12 TB drives are doing well and will help with higher capacities...

Backblaze reports Q3 2017 HDD Failure results - includes 12 TB Drives as well - 11/01/2017 09:36 AM
Online and cloud service provider Backblaze released a new listing of HDD failure rates for Q3 2017. At the end of this quarter, they had 86,529 spinning hard drives. Q3 statistics that include our fi...

Backblaze report: 8-terabyte HDDs lasting a long time - HGST Most Reliable - 02/01/2017 10:02 AM
Online and cloud service provider Backblaze released a new listing of HDD failure rates for Q4 2017. At the end of 2016 they had 73,653 spinning hard drives. Of that number, there were 1,553 boot d...


slyphnier
Senior Member



Posts: 813
Joined: 2009-11-30

#5543752 Posted on: 05/04/2018 08:14 AM
i think this worth to note

*based what i search, so feel free to cmiiw
those HGST drive HMS5C4040ALE630/ALE640/BLE640 is MEGASCALE / CoolSpin line up
basically enterprise / DC model hdd

consumer NAS model is HDN7240******** / HDN7260********
source: https://www.hgst.com/sites/default/files/resources/DS-NAS-ds.pdf

i know back google hdd reliability paper said enterprise and consumer hdd reliability is not much different, but the table and what backblaze saying can a bit missleading

as like in table :
toshiba MD04ABA***V is surveilance HDD

WD40(30)EFRX this is WD RED not even PRO version which model type should end with FFWX, not even gold (****FRYZ)

what i am trying to say, backblaze table didn't using same class/work-rate hdd
so i wonder if the table have really meaning / proving failure-rate
as if some model have higher failure rate, it can be because the hdd not designed as server workload

SHS
Senior Member



Posts: 474
Joined: 2001-05-02

#5544293 Posted on: 05/06/2018 02:42 AM
Yup that the whole problem with Backblaze the 4TB HGST is a Enterprise Hard Drive not Retail or OEM that why look they so good you pay out nose for them so I say over there nothing wrong with Seagate sure just any other drive that can go bad just like SSD
Seagate ST?000DM00? - Consumer OEM drive
Seagate ST?000AS00? - Consumer Retail
Seagate ST?000NM000? - Enterprise drive

Noisiv
Senior Member



Posts: 7698
Joined: 2010-11-16

#5544339 Posted on: 05/06/2018 01:00 PM
In Backblaze environment Seagate's Enterprise disks are not doing any better than consumer disk.
I suspect same might be true for WD/WD pro.

I am thinking Enteprise/consumer are physically the same.

Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021