Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4255
GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.2 WHQL download
GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver download
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.0 Beta3 Download
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download 2.10.2.2367
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.1 WHQL download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.1
CPU-Z download v2.05
AMD Chipset Drivers Download 5.02.19.2221


New Forum Topics
FSR Thread Diablo IV Beta Reportedly Causing Issues with GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Potentially Leading to Card Failure NVIDIA GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver Download & Discussion Afterburner - OSD "skin" NVIDIA GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver Download & Discussion RDNA3 RX7000 Seriess! Owners Thread, Tests, Benchmarks, Screenshots, Overclocks, & Tweaks! Review: ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 Windows power plan settings explorer utility 531.41 - Clean Version Need Help with my 3070 Gamerock RGB




Guru3D.com » News » Average Annual Rate of Hard Drive Failure Stats for 2022 are out

Average Annual Rate of Hard Drive Failure Stats for 2022 are out

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 02/01/2023 09:56 AM | source: | 6 comment(s)
Average Annual Rate of Hard Drive Failure Stats for 2022 are out

Backblaze, a cloud storage and data backup company, has published its annual report on hard drive failures for 2022. The report provides information on the reliability of hard drives, which are still relevant for secondary storage despite the popularity of SSDs. 

The company analyzed 230,921 hard drives and found that Seagate's Exos 8TB (ST8000NM000A) had no failures in 2022. However, it's important to note that Backblaze only had 79 of these drives in use. The annualized failure rate for hard drives has increased in recent years, with the rate for 2022 reaching 1.37%. This is due to the aging of the drives, which become more prone to failure over time. The HGST Ultrastar He8 8TB and Seagate Exos X14 14TB had the highest failure rates at 5.27% and 5.70%, respectively, but it's important to consider the smaller sample size for these models.

Seagate's 8TB hard drive, the Exos ST8000NM000A, was the standout performer in the report. It had no failures recorded in 2022, but it's important to note that there were only 79 of these drives in use. Additionally, these drives had only been in use for a little over 22,000 days and were mainly used as backup drives to replace failed drives. The yearly failure rate for hard drives has risen in the past three years, reaching 1.37% in 2022. This increase is due to the age of the drives, as all hardware becomes more likely to fail over time. In 2020, the failure rate was 0.93% and in 2021 it was 1.10%.




Average Annual Rate of Hard Drive Failure Stats for 2022 are out Average Annual Rate of Hard Drive Failure Stats for 2022 are out Average Annual Rate of Hard Drive Failure Stats for 2022 are out Average Annual Rate of Hard Drive Failure Stats for 2022 are out




« ASUS ROG launch Aim Lab Editions of the Harpe Ace Gaming Mouse and Hone Ace Mouse Pad · Average Annual Rate of Hard Drive Failure Stats for 2022 are out · Samsung Issues new Firmware to prevent Dying 980 Pro SSDs »

Related Stories

Review average of 17 websites shows 6800 XT to be 7.4% Slower than GeForce RTX 3080 - 11/20/2020 06:11 PM
It is always an interesting observation to make when our german colleagues of 3Dcenter take the results of seventeen websites and then average the benchmarks. This round, they've been comparing the R...

Average Selling Prices of Hard Disk Drives after Floods - 01/25/2013 02:15 PM
Over at Xbitlabs they compiled this great little charts showing how incredibly slow average selling prices of HDDS are dropping back to the “pre-flood” levels, but today&rsquo...

Average Gamer is 37 Years Old - 06/09/2011 09:52 AM
The Entertainment Software Association states that the average gamer is 37yrs old. The group also says that gamers play games with their kids and make sure that they are being kept away from violent o...


2 pages 1 2


Kaarme
Senior Member



Posts: 3363
Joined: 2013-03-10

#6098655 Posted on: 02/01/2023 10:06 AM
The Seagate 1500 drives is a pretty decent sample size already. The HGST one looks bad because all the drives were only put in use last year, yet already over 5% failed. It was a small sample size, so it certainly suggests it's either a bad batch or there's a design error.

jose2016
Senior Member



Posts: 150
Joined: 2016-12-31

#6098656 Posted on: 02/01/2023 10:11 AM
Seagate a bit disappointing

rl66
Senior Member



Posts: 3604
Joined: 2007-05-31

#6098720 Posted on: 02/01/2023 01:31 PM
Seagate a bit disappointing

The worse seagate are ultra low price, when you buy a HDD that cost near 50% of the regular one from seagate, you know that there is more risk...
I am more happy for them with the main line and pro line result compared to other brand.

SHS
Senior Member



Posts: 501
Joined: 2001-05-02

#6098796 Posted on: 02/01/2023 04:55 PM
Seagate a bit disappointing

how do you figure when they deploy three to four times more hard drive than anybody else so if you were to average out the same amount of drive from each other manufacturer it would be about close to the same.

geogan
Senior Member



Posts: 1170
Joined: 2010-01-04

#6098876 Posted on: 02/01/2023 07:22 PM
These stats are skewed by those drives reported as failed but which actually did not actually fail at all, but were replaced in data-center for a new drive anyway, because those working there for minimum wages take the drives out, report them as failed, and sell the drives themselves on second-hand market... its an easy scam and very profitable one ;)

2 pages 1 2


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023