AMD Ryzen 7 3800X review
PowerColor 5700 RED DEVIL review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke review
ASUS Radeon RX 5700 XT ROG STRIX review
ViewSonic Elite XG240R Monitor Review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
X570 Aorus master review
Cooler Master Silencio S600 review
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G review
ASUS RoG Swift PG35VQ Monitor review
Another AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review/Benchmarks Leaks
A new set benchmarks have leaked onto the web, the Ryzen 5 3600 processor involves the cheapest 199 USD based Ryzen 5 3600. This is the slowest and most affordable SKU that AMD will release with six cores and twelve threads.
The Ryzen 5 3600 has a base clock of 3.6 GHz and can turbo to 4.2 GHz. From the looks of it, somebody has been able to grab a retail package as a photo of the box and proc has been included. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was tested on an X470 motherboard, G.Skill FlareX DDR4 @ 3200 MHz and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE. If true, for the money the Ryzen 5 3600 proves to be an interesting mainstream gaming desktop processor
Before we show you the stuff, we cannot vouch for its validity whatsoever okay? So take these results with a big grain of salt.
Update: they updated their review based on an unspecified X570 motherboard with close to NIL perf differences, we updated the benchmarks.
Global HDD sales drop another 12% to 77 million devices for Q1 2019 - 04/21/2019 12:36 PM
You probably have noticed that SSDs came, saw and conquered the storage markets the past few years. And that certainly has an effect on HDD sales. In the years to come I predict there will be a tippi...
NVIDIA to launch another Series 16 GPU: GeForce GTX 1650 next month - 02/21/2019 10:17 AM
While the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti still has to be released, there already is word out about another SKU that would be released, the GeForce GTX 1650....
Windows 10 version 1809 sees another data loss issue - 10/22/2018 04:47 PM
Though the impact this time is far less extensive, a new bug is plaguing users of the new the October Update of Windows 10, files again disappear. The updated OS seems to be making mistakes when ex...
Intel to release Cooper Lake - Another 14nm based processor - 08/09/2018 01:54 PM
We've mentioned a couple of times that Intel is fighting the 10nm fabrication node. Intel used to adopt the so-called "Tick-Tock" model, but currently are looking at a 4th tock. Intel o...
Another Core i7-8700K & Core i5 8600K Review Leaks - 09/29/2017 01:01 PM
Yet another core i7 8700K review leaks today, this time originating from Romania. As you guys know, most of the EU media isn't seeded processors for reviews anymore by Intel (it's like we do not exi...
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 2545
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 2545
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5684482 Posted on: 06/26/2019 08:19 AM
I think this is very impressive. Intel is in trouble.
I think this is very impressive. Intel is in trouble.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9504
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 9504
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5684493 Posted on: 06/26/2019 09:04 AM
I have to repeat myself
While we may fight over AMD's chips as production may not be sufficient to satisfy market, intel is one to laugh as AMD's production will make only small dent to their sales.
I think this is very impressive. Intel is in trouble.
I have to repeat myself
While we may fight over AMD's chips as production may not be sufficient to satisfy market, intel is one to laugh as AMD's production will make only small dent to their sales.
cryohellinc
Senior Member
Posts: 2545
Joined: 2014-10-20
Senior Member
Posts: 2545
Joined: 2014-10-20
#5684496 Posted on: 06/26/2019 09:23 AM
I have to repeat myself
While we may fight over AMD's chips as production may not be sufficient to satisfy market, intel is one to laugh as AMD's production will make only small dent to their sales.
Regardless of Intel's scale, this will hurt them. As far as I know, Intel's "answer" will come only around Q4 this year, resulting in several months of free reign for AMD.
From a consumer standpoint, I can only hope for sufficient supply.
I have to repeat myself
While we may fight over AMD's chips as production may not be sufficient to satisfy market, intel is one to laugh as AMD's production will make only small dent to their sales.
Regardless of Intel's scale, this will hurt them. As far as I know, Intel's "answer" will come only around Q4 this year, resulting in several months of free reign for AMD.
From a consumer standpoint, I can only hope for sufficient supply.
Glottiz
Senior Member
Posts: 457
Joined: 2006-11-18
Senior Member
Posts: 457
Joined: 2006-11-18
#5684500 Posted on: 06/26/2019 09:36 AM
How convenient that similarly priced 9600K is omitted from this "leak". I guess when they show that Ryzen 3600 is very close to 9900K makes them look good. But if they show that 3600 is trailing behind 9600K that wouldn't look so good. Just let me remind you that 9600K has almost identical gaming performance to 9900K.
How convenient that similarly priced 9600K is omitted from this "leak". I guess when they show that Ryzen 3600 is very close to 9900K makes them look good. But if they show that 3600 is trailing behind 9600K that wouldn't look so good. Just let me remind you that 9600K has almost identical gaming performance to 9900K.
Vananovion
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: 2017-08-31
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: 2017-08-31
#5684502 Posted on: 06/26/2019 09:45 AM
"This is the slowest and most affordable SKU that AMD will release with six cores and twelve threads."
What a time to be alive
.
"This is the slowest and most affordable SKU that AMD will release with six cores and twelve threads."
What a time to be alive
.
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1558
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1558
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5684513 Posted on: 06/26/2019 10:20 AM
Haha, placing demands on the leaker's (or faker's) presentation of hardware? You are quite a padawan.
How convenient that similarly priced 9600K is omitted from this "leak". I guess when they show that Ryzen 3600 is very close to 9900K makes them look good. But if they show that 3600 is trailing behind 9600K that wouldn't look so good. Just let me remind you that 9600K has almost identical gaming performance to 9900K.
Haha, placing demands on the leaker's (or faker's) presentation of hardware? You are quite a padawan.
Glottiz
Senior Member
Posts: 457
Joined: 2006-11-18
Senior Member
Posts: 457
Joined: 2006-11-18
#5684518 Posted on: 06/26/2019 10:34 AM
Demands? I'm just pointing out a big flaw in this "leak". But I guess you have no counter argument as you resorted to calling me silly names.
Haha, placing demands on the leaker's (or faker's) presentation of hardware? You are quite a padawan.
Demands? I'm just pointing out a big flaw in this "leak". But I guess you have no counter argument as you resorted to calling me silly names.
oxidized
Senior Member
Posts: 197
Joined: 2017-08-22
Senior Member
Posts: 197
Joined: 2017-08-22
#5684531 Posted on: 06/26/2019 11:46 AM
Update already Hilbert, theres a post from the same site with x570 results.
looks like the benches have been done with the ram at 2667, going by the memory latency.
Are you talking about x470 or x570 tests? Because x470 was tested with a 3200MHz G.Skill FlareX kit.
Update already Hilbert, theres a post from the same site with x570 results.
looks like the benches have been done with the ram at 2667, going by the memory latency.
Are you talking about x470 or x570 tests? Because x470 was tested with a 3200MHz G.Skill FlareX kit.
Exodite
Senior Member
Posts: 1863
Joined: 2006-09-28
Senior Member
Posts: 1863
Joined: 2006-09-28
#5684532 Posted on: 06/26/2019 11:54 AM
How convenient that similarly priced 9600K is omitted from this "leak".
...
Just let me remind you that 9600K has almost identical gaming performance to 9900K.
I'm sure that when we get actual reviews from all the reputable actors we'll get comparisons with the 9600K as well.
That said I'm not convinced it matters, as no one actually uses those. And by "no one" I mean that the i5 line haven't made much sense to buy into since AMD released first generation Ryzen, in addition to suffering from generally low availability.
The 9900K makes sense the same way the 2080 Ti does, it's the fastest you can get for gaming - money being no object. But once you're constrained on something, be it money, refresh rates, doing productivity work as well as gaming or whatever else, I wouldn't recommend an i5.
I'm by no means trying to defend some leaked review from a site I never read here, just not sure how the lack of a 9600K comparison in particular matters much. Not that I'd mind seeing one. *shrug*
As for gaming performance I can't agree with that. Sure you'll get close to a 9900K depending on the game and settings but that could be said of most modern 6+ thread processors. The 9900K is definitely a tier above the 9600K though, all the reviews I've looked at show as much.
How convenient that similarly priced 9600K is omitted from this "leak".
...
Just let me remind you that 9600K has almost identical gaming performance to 9900K.
I'm sure that when we get actual reviews from all the reputable actors we'll get comparisons with the 9600K as well.
That said I'm not convinced it matters, as no one actually uses those. And by "no one" I mean that the i5 line haven't made much sense to buy into since AMD released first generation Ryzen, in addition to suffering from generally low availability.
The 9900K makes sense the same way the 2080 Ti does, it's the fastest you can get for gaming - money being no object. But once you're constrained on something, be it money, refresh rates, doing productivity work as well as gaming or whatever else, I wouldn't recommend an i5.
I'm by no means trying to defend some leaked review from a site I never read here, just not sure how the lack of a 9600K comparison in particular matters much. Not that I'd mind seeing one. *shrug*
As for gaming performance I can't agree with that. Sure you'll get close to a 9900K depending on the game and settings but that could be said of most modern 6+ thread processors. The 9900K is definitely a tier above the 9600K though, all the reviews I've looked at show as much.
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1558
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1558
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5684533 Posted on: 06/26/2019 11:55 AM
What counter argument? There's none needed. There have been leaks (or fake leaks) like this for great many years, and they typically have a totally random selection of hardware for comparison, if indeed they have anything at all. I only called you inexperienced because you said a certain model you deemed as the most relevant for comparison had been left out supposedly on purpose.
Demands? I'm just pointing out a big flaw in this "leak". But I guess you have no counter argument as you resorted to calling me silly names.
What counter argument? There's none needed. There have been leaks (or fake leaks) like this for great many years, and they typically have a totally random selection of hardware for comparison, if indeed they have anything at all. I only called you inexperienced because you said a certain model you deemed as the most relevant for comparison had been left out supposedly on purpose.
d2v
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2019-06-18
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2019-06-18
#5684535 Posted on: 06/26/2019 11:57 AM
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 2564
Joined: 2018-03-21
Senior Member
Posts: 2564
Joined: 2018-03-21
#5684543 Posted on: 06/26/2019 12:28 PM
neither have been tested with the ram running at 3200mh.
Are you talking about x470 or x570 tests? Because x470 was tested with a 3200MHz G.Skill FlareX kit.
neither have been tested with the ram running at 3200mh.
oxidized
Senior Member
Posts: 197
Joined: 2017-08-22
Senior Member
Posts: 197
Joined: 2017-08-22
#5684544 Posted on: 06/26/2019 12:35 PM
They state that at the beginning of the review.
Also, glad to see it performs a little bit better on almost everything with x570
neither have been tested with the ram running at 3200mh.
They state that at the beginning of the review.
Also, glad to see it performs a little bit better on almost everything with x570
Alessio1989
Senior Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: 2015-06-11
Senior Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: 2015-06-11
#5684548 Posted on: 06/26/2019 12:46 PM
who carse about the south bridge? It has nothing to do with the CPU or the MC... Those differences just OS and PCB noise.
who carse about the south bridge? It has nothing to do with the CPU or the MC... Those differences just OS and PCB noise.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2564
Joined: 2018-03-21
Update already Hilbert, theres a post from the same site with x570 results.
looks like the benches have been done with the ram at 2667, going by the memory latency.