be quiet! Dark Rock PRO TR4 review
MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Gaming Z review
Palit GeForce RTX 2060 GamingPro OC review
Promo: MS Office 2016 Pro Plus Key For $31.5
Corsair IronClaw RGB mouse review
Corsair Harpoon RGB Wireless mouse review
Corsair M65 RGB ELITE game mouse review
GeForce RTX 2060 review (founder)
WD Black NVME SSD (1TB) Review
Seasonic Focus SGX-650 Power Supply review
AMD Vega 20 Spotted in Final Fantasy XV benchmark?
A graphics card listed with hardware device ID 66AF:C1 was spotted in the Final Fantasy XV benchmark. That could very well be the long-discussed Vega 20, which is pending a release late this year.
We talked about Vega 20 many times, it would be the 7nm Vega iteration of the existing GPU. Videocardz spotted this one and thinks it could be a Radeon Instinct based card. They also note it could be fake as heck of course. One thing matches, 66AF:C1 belongs to the Vega 20 device ID of hardware identifiers.
AMD Vega 20 3DMark11 benchmark surfaces - 04/30/2018 08:09 AM
We've heard about the GPU called VEGA20 a number of times already. Vega 20 is to be a die shrunk version of Vega, with more memory. So it is expected to have the same 64CUs as in Vega 10 but would b...
AMD Vega 20 and Ryzen 5 Pro Mobile Say Hello - 09/26/2017 07:49 AM
On a newly leaked roadmap slash set of media slides some new info on AMD Vega 20 and Ryzen 5 Pro Mobile have exposed itself. Let's have a peek at them....
AMD Vega RX 56 With Triple-Fans Surfaces - 08/14/2017 07:35 AM
Interesting, if you have had a peek at some of the photos in our unboxing of Vega, you should have noticed that the last photo showed Vega 56. That product has a blower single fan style cooler. New ph...
AMD Vega Frontier Edition Unboxed and Benchmark (updated) - 06/28/2017 02:42 PM
With AMDs Vega Frontier Edition now available it was onlt a matter of time before a consumer would get his hands on it. User #define @ Disqus purchased one, took unboxing photos and ran a 3DMark Fir...
AMD VEGA Die-shot Photo - 06/06/2017 06:19 AM
Well, GPU shot reallt. Check it out, I checked with AMD if this is a real photo and not a fakes one. It is the real thing though. The VEGA shot shows a thing or two, you can count the 8 blocks that go...
DDRSAM
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: 2016-11-30
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: 2016-11-30
#5600084 Posted on: 10/25/2018 04:42 PM
$399 and we have a serious contender on our hands
$399 and we have a serious contender on our hands
icedman
Senior Member
Posts: 821
Joined: 2013-02-22
Senior Member
Posts: 821
Joined: 2013-02-22
#5600085 Posted on: 10/25/2018 04:42 PM
Any word on if AMD is going to continue pushing HBM with this card or will they be going the gddr6 route now, I'm all for the advancement of HBM but gddr6 seems much more viable in terms of cost.
Any word on if AMD is going to continue pushing HBM with this card or will they be going the gddr6 route now, I'm all for the advancement of HBM but gddr6 seems much more viable in terms of cost.
msotirov
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2017-08-28
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2017-08-28
#5600086 Posted on: 10/25/2018 04:48 PM
Vega 20 is a machine learning card. It doesn't aim gamers.
To your other point, Vega 64 is cheaper than RTX 2070 in Germany and Vega 56 is much cheaper.
If it is real it should be priced under or up to RTX 2070. I do not see any Vega 64 with that price tag. I hope 7nm make prices more realistic and viable for AMD fans. Also I am interested to see improved consumption and thermals.
Vega 20 is a machine learning card. It doesn't aim gamers.
To your other point, Vega 64 is cheaper than RTX 2070 in Germany and Vega 56 is much cheaper.
Fediuld
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: 2016-10-04
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: 2016-10-04
#5600087 Posted on: 10/25/2018 04:49 PM
LOL.
This is not Vega 20. Hell is it not even Vega 64 as it is way faster than this.
Also there is no proof. Someone got the bar chart and added a value.
Damn fake clickbait articles.
LOL.
This is not Vega 20. Hell is it not even Vega 64 as it is way faster than this.
Also there is no proof. Someone got the bar chart and added a value.
Damn fake clickbait articles.
Fediuld
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: 2016-10-04
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: 2016-10-04
#5600089 Posted on: 10/25/2018 04:53 PM
Vega 64 (Nitro, Red Devil) is cheaper than 2070 in UK and is way faster. Even the reference if you buy used is faster assuming you can live with the blower cooler, and chop (reduce) 50mv-75mv from P7 & P6 states, raising the HBM to 1100.
With those settings it even beats watercooled GTX1080 @ 2190 burning even less power than it
If it is real it should be priced under or up to RTX 2070. I do not see any Vega 64 with that price tag. I hope 7nm make prices more realistic and viable for AMD fans. Also I am interested to see improved consumption and thermals.
Vega 64 (Nitro, Red Devil) is cheaper than 2070 in UK and is way faster. Even the reference if you buy used is faster assuming you can live with the blower cooler, and chop (reduce) 50mv-75mv from P7 & P6 states, raising the HBM to 1100.
With those settings it even beats watercooled GTX1080 @ 2190 burning even less power than it
Brisse
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2015-05-28
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2015-05-28
#5600092 Posted on: 10/25/2018 04:57 PM
Vega20 PCI ID's in the Linux kernel are 0x66A0, 0x66A1, 0x66A2, 0x66A3, 0x66A7, and 0x66AF so this does indeed match the actual hardware. That doesn't in any way mean the results are legit though.
Vega20 PCI ID's in the Linux kernel are 0x66A0, 0x66A1, 0x66A2, 0x66A3, 0x66A7, and 0x66AF so this does indeed match the actual hardware. That doesn't in any way mean the results are legit though.
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 15895
Joined: 2012-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 15895
Joined: 2012-05-18
#5600112 Posted on: 10/25/2018 05:50 PM
Or it is and it's a vega20 56model. That said full 64chip could have some room to spare
Or it is and it's a vega20 56model. That said full 64chip could have some room to spare
Brisse
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2015-05-28
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2015-05-28
#5600138 Posted on: 10/25/2018 06:58 PM
This, plus if it's a prototype then it's likely not running at the clock speeds of the final product. Could also be someone faked the PCI ID and uploaded results for something completely else. Either way we can't really draw any real conclusions because we don't know what is being tested and how.
Or it is and it's a vega20 56model. That said full 64chip could have some room to spare
This, plus if it's a prototype then it's likely not running at the clock speeds of the final product. Could also be someone faked the PCI ID and uploaded results for something completely else. Either way we can't really draw any real conclusions because we don't know what is being tested and how.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 3509
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 3509
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5600151 Posted on: 10/25/2018 07:30 PM
Assuming it isn't faked, that PCI ID is in fact from Vega 20:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news-item&px=Vega-20-RadeonSI-Gallium3D
AMD's actual developers have basically proved that the ID is
Also, nobody said this was the successor to specifically the Vega 64. There are several PCI IDs; this is just one of them. For all we know, this could be a mid-range chip or even a Firepro chip of the Vega 20 series.
This is not Vega 20. Hell is it not even Vega 64 as it is way faster than this.
Assuming it isn't faked, that PCI ID is in fact from Vega 20:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news-item&px=Vega-20-RadeonSI-Gallium3D
AMD's actual developers have basically proved that the ID is
Also, nobody said this was the successor to specifically the Vega 64. There are several PCI IDs; this is just one of them. For all we know, this could be a mid-range chip or even a Firepro chip of the Vega 20 series.
Fediuld
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: 2016-10-04
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: 2016-10-04
#5600161 Posted on: 10/25/2018 08:06 PM
Assuming it isn't faked, that PCI ID is in fact from Vega 20:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news-item&px=Vega-20-RadeonSI-Gallium3D
AMD's actual developers have basically proved that the ID is
Also, nobody said this was the successor to specifically the Vega 64. There are several PCI IDs; this is just one of them. For all we know, this could be a mid-range chip or even a Firepro chip of the Vega 20 series.
I can use Paint.net to generate the same images showing the same ID card beating the RTX2080Ti by X%.
Is fake. Because they used the ID doesn't mean they bench the card.
Assuming it isn't faked, that PCI ID is in fact from Vega 20:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news-item&px=Vega-20-RadeonSI-Gallium3D
AMD's actual developers have basically proved that the ID is
Also, nobody said this was the successor to specifically the Vega 64. There are several PCI IDs; this is just one of them. For all we know, this could be a mid-range chip or even a Firepro chip of the Vega 20 series.
I can use Paint.net to generate the same images showing the same ID card beating the RTX2080Ti by X%.
Is fake. Because they used the ID doesn't mean they bench the card.
Hapatingjaky
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: 2010-09-14
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: 2010-09-14
#5600184 Posted on: 10/25/2018 09:15 PM
You all realize that Vega20/NAVI is more then likely what Polaris was too Fury. Wasn't a performance improvement but a low power indentical or slightly faster then its predecessor.
Performance Per Watt card, instead of 300w they can do it at 150w.
Seems completely plausible that this is what we'd be looking at if indeed the card was benchmarked and this isn't fake.
You all realize that Vega20/NAVI is more then likely what Polaris was too Fury. Wasn't a performance improvement but a low power indentical or slightly faster then its predecessor.
Performance Per Watt card, instead of 300w they can do it at 150w.
Seems completely plausible that this is what we'd be looking at if indeed the card was benchmarked and this isn't fake.
EL1TE
Senior Member
Posts: 392
Joined: 2007-11-18
Senior Member
Posts: 392
Joined: 2007-11-18
#5600209 Posted on: 10/25/2018 10:44 PM
I can use Paint.net to generate the same images showing the same ID card beating the RTX2080Ti by X%.
Is fake. Because they used the ID doesn't mean they bench the card.
Yeah i bet the official site was also hacked where the results can be seen by anyone: http://benchmark.finalfantasyxv.com/result/
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I can use Paint.net to generate the same images showing the same ID card beating the RTX2080Ti by X%.
Is fake. Because they used the ID doesn't mean they bench the card.
Yeah i bet the official site was also hacked where the results can be seen by anyone: http://benchmark.finalfantasyxv.com/result/
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
386SX
Senior Member
Posts: 308
Joined: 2017-06-26
Senior Member
Posts: 308
Joined: 2017-06-26
#5600216 Posted on: 10/25/2018 11:20 PM
Hmmm, and if the "benchmarked" ID is the same 1GHz core sample from here:
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/amd-vega-20-3dmark11-benchmark-surfaces.html
... and they turn it up to 1,6 to 2,0GHz at launch ...
... and this sample only was the 56 ...
Hmmm, and if the "benchmarked" ID is the same 1GHz core sample from here:
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/amd-vega-20-3dmark11-benchmark-surfaces.html
... and they turn it up to 1,6 to 2,0GHz at launch ...
... and this sample only was the 56 ...
Killian38
Senior Member
Posts: 283
Joined: 2017-09-02
Senior Member
Posts: 283
Joined: 2017-09-02
#5600233 Posted on: 10/26/2018 12:51 AM
If it preforms on par with the 2070 it will be a failure. The vega 56 modded matches a stock 2070. But, it doesn't really matter how good it is. They can ask 800-1000 buck for it easy. Why? Because.
If it preforms on par with the 2070 it will be a failure. The vega 56 modded matches a stock 2070. But, it doesn't really matter how good it is. They can ask 800-1000 buck for it easy. Why? Because.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1764
Joined: 2012-10-22
If it is real it should be priced under or up to RTX 2070. I do not see any Vega 64 with that price tag. I hope 7nm make prices more realistic and viable for AMD fans. Also I am interested to see improved consumption and thermals.