Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
Corsair 2000D RGB Airflow Mini-ITX - PC chassis review
ASUS PG27AQDM Review - 240Hz 1440p OLED monitor
AMD Ryzen 5 5300G Engineering Sample Sold on Ebay and Benchmarked
There are still a few things pending in the ZEN3 line of products, APUs for example. Among the line, a Ryzen 5 5300G, and that one has been sighted as an engineering sample, and tested.
The proc has actually been listed on eBay and carries hardware ID 100-000000262-30_Y, the proc was already sold, however, benchmarks have been posted. To prove that this engineering sample is indeed a Cezanne line APU, seller Hugohk posted a series of snapshots and even a video showing the processor in operation. The seller also provided some details on the performance of the Ryzen 3 5300G, compared to other processors on the market. The Ryzen 3 5300G reportedly performs well in Cinebench R15 and R20, scoring higher than other processors such as the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. In order to test the games, Hugohk had to use unofficial drivers in order to use the processor's integrated GPU. As a result, in the two titles tested, the APU performed satisfactorily, hitting 95 FPS with "low" graphics in Battlefield 4 at 1080p resolution. With the low availability of graphics cards in the market, and the problem of price premiums, the Ryzen 3 5300G could hit the market as a cheap alternative for those looking to play on PC.
The 5300G would get four cores and eight threads with a dormant 3.5 GHz base clock, boost/turbo frequencies however are unknown, Check it out:
AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (non-X) Spotted - 02/22/2021 08:33 AM
Dell is listing an unannounced processor from AMD. For the ZEN3 AMD only has launched the X model, however, system builder Dell is now listing a Ryzen 7 5800....
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G desktop apu doing rounds - 02/15/2021 09:11 AM
An AMD Ryzen 7 5000G APU has surfaced on the web, with CPU-Z screenshots and everything. This ZEN3 desktop APU has eight Zen 3 cores with sixteen threads and an integrated Vega GPU. A product that AMD...
Intel DG1 GPU incompatible with the AMD Ryzen platform and high-end Intel mobos - 01/27/2021 10:19 PM
Yesterday we posted a news item in which Intel announced the Iris Xe, 10nm DG1 GPU with 80 Execution Units (640 Shader Units). The cards will not be available to the public; instead, they are OEM-base...
ROG Strix SCAR 17 with the latest AMD Ryzen processors and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30 graphics - 01/27/2021 11:48 AM
The ROG Strix SCAR 17 gaming notebook is now available. The latest model is available with the latest AMD Ryzen 9 processor as well as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 laptop GPU . It offers mobile gaming ...
AMD Ryzen 5000U and Ryzen 5000HX Mobile processors announced - 01/12/2021 08:12 PM
AMD today announced their ZEN3 architecture based processors for ultra-thin notebooks beginning with the Ryzen 7 5800U. New mobile 8-core 5800 and 5900HX series for gaming are announced as well. ...
anticupidon
Senior Member
Posts: 7261
Joined: 2008-03-06
Senior Member
Posts: 7261
Joined: 2008-03-06
#5895652 Posted on: 03/15/2021 09:36 AM
Still has Vega GPU or Navi?
Still has Vega GPU or Navi?
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 3655
Joined: 2007-05-31
Senior Member
Posts: 3655
Joined: 2007-05-31
#5895659 Posted on: 03/15/2021 09:46 AM
Vega 8 on this one, on other hand Navi would bring no advantage on this APU, we will see the final product.
If it follow the 4000 line, it will have 8 CPU core for the "big" one, so the GPU part should be really small, as AMD have chunk a lot the cache to put it on chip.
Also oponent GPU are GT 710, 730, and Intel 630... it is already above.
Still has Vega GPU or Navi?
Vega 8 on this one, on other hand Navi would bring no advantage on this APU, we will see the final product.
If it follow the 4000 line, it will have 8 CPU core for the "big" one, so the GPU part should be really small, as AMD have chunk a lot the cache to put it on chip.
Also oponent GPU are GT 710, 730, and Intel 630... it is already above.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5895671 Posted on: 03/15/2021 10:59 AM
Vega 8 on this one, on other hand Navi would bring no advantage on this APU, we will see the final product.
If it follow the 4000 line, it will have 8 CPU core for the "big" one, so the GPU part should be really small, as AMD have chunk a lot the cache to put it on chip.
Also oponent GPU are GT 710, 730, and Intel 630... it is already above.
Could be interesting to see effect of IC shared between GPU and CPU (instead of L3).
And as of no effect. All APUs have severely limited iGPUs by memory bandwidth. Even 2400G with 11CUs was just tiny bit faster than 2200G with 8CUs at lower frequency.
IC has bigger performance improving potential for APUs than it has for desktop GPUs.
AMD could maybe go even for 16CUs with RDNA2 without choking them badly.
Vega 8 on this one, on other hand Navi would bring no advantage on this APU, we will see the final product.
If it follow the 4000 line, it will have 8 CPU core for the "big" one, so the GPU part should be really small, as AMD have chunk a lot the cache to put it on chip.
Also oponent GPU are GT 710, 730, and Intel 630... it is already above.
Could be interesting to see effect of IC shared between GPU and CPU (instead of L3).
And as of no effect. All APUs have severely limited iGPUs by memory bandwidth. Even 2400G with 11CUs was just tiny bit faster than 2200G with 8CUs at lower frequency.
IC has bigger performance improving potential for APUs than it has for desktop GPUs.
AMD could maybe go even for 16CUs with RDNA2 without choking them badly.
kapu
Senior Member
Posts: 5377
Joined: 2006-12-22
Senior Member
Posts: 5377
Joined: 2006-12-22
#5895681 Posted on: 03/15/2021 11:19 AM
Could be interesting to see effect of IC shared between GPU and CPU (instead of L3).
And as of no effect. All APUs have severely limited iGPUs by memory bandwidth. Even 2400G with 11CUs was just tiny bit faster than 2200G with 8CUs at lower frequency.
IC has bigger performance improving potential for APUs than it has for desktop GPUs.
AMD could maybe go even for 16CUs with RDNA2 without choking them badly.
Any word when we can see RDNA2 APUs ? It could be game breking for " low end gaming PC"
Could be interesting to see effect of IC shared between GPU and CPU (instead of L3).
And as of no effect. All APUs have severely limited iGPUs by memory bandwidth. Even 2400G with 11CUs was just tiny bit faster than 2200G with 8CUs at lower frequency.
IC has bigger performance improving potential for APUs than it has for desktop GPUs.
AMD could maybe go even for 16CUs with RDNA2 without choking them badly.
Any word when we can see RDNA2 APUs ? It could be game breking for " low end gaming PC"
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3655
Joined: 2007-05-31
Not bad for the "small" APU, better than the 4000 version wich is good.
We will see what the commercial version bring in G3D to have a final idea of it.