Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX White review
Cougar Terminator gaming chair review
G.Skill TridentZ5 RGB DDR5 7200 CL34 2x16 GB review
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review

New Downloads
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.4 build 27560
HWiNFO Download v7.42
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4257
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.0 Beta4 Download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.88
GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.2 WHQL download
GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver download
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download 2.10.2.2367
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.1 WHQL download


New Forum Topics
NVIDIA GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver Download & Discussion AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 23.3.2 WHQL - Driver Download and Discussion NVIDIA Profile Inspector 2.4.0.4 Is 7700 a big step down from 7700X ? Review: GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX White MSI AB / RTSS development news thread Download: Introducing RTSS 7.3.4: Comprehensive Performance Monitoring and Capture Solution for Gamers who knows how to fix this visual issue (i think it is motherboard) aging 6700k Mainstream GeForce RTX 4050 Graphics Card Launching in June 2023




Guru3D.com » News » AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 06/19/2015 09:18 AM | source: | 208 comment(s)
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks

Okay before we dive into this one, I have to state the following. The benchmarks that got posted yesterday, and are shown in the chart below, originate from the AMD reviewers guide. Someone posted them on-line, and he shouldn't have as benchmarks results are to be released next week.

Secondly, and I want to make a strong note about this, these benchmarks are made by AMD themselves, it's at 4K only and paints a very narrow picture. Please understand that when a company shows performance results in a guide or document, only the positive numbers are included. I mean its a marketing strategy to make 'the other guys' look bad. Yes, cherry picked results.

So I don't even know who leaked these (techreport I think) ? The embargo is a bit of a mess, any courtesy goes out to whoever that is.

 


So please do take these things with a grain of salt and just wait for the real-world numbers from media outlets like Guru3D.com before you draw any conclusions okay ? The Radeon R9 Fury X packs 4096 GCN cores and 8.9 billion transistors. 
 



AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks	AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks




« AMD Releases Radeon R9 Fury X details + exclusive photos · AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks · Intel Skylake to debut In August at Gamescom »

Related Stories

AMD Radeon Fury X doesn't have HDMI 2.0 support - 06/18/2015 07:49 AM
So if you had a peek about all everything presented in the past few days, one thing you will have noticed. The new architecture doesn't support HDMI 2.0, but instead uses HDMI 1.4a. This means with F...

AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL - 06/10/2015 05:47 PM
So the funny thing about people as that once they have hardware, they test stuff and sometimes forget that the results of a benchmark are inserted into a database, which is publicly available. AMD Rad...

AMD Radeon Graphics Channel Roadmap Surfaces - 06/10/2015 08:17 AM
Nothing is safe on the web it seems. A new roadmap leaked onto the web showing AMD's Radeon lineup for 2015. It is as discussed many times now, exactly what we told for a while now. Lots of respins a...

AMD Radeon R9 370 Reference Design Pictured - 06/09/2015 04:01 PM
Over at Alienware they are showing a photo of what seems to be the Radeon R9 370. The reference product has had a bit of a redesign alright. ...

AMD Radeon 300 Series Pricing Revealed - 06/09/2015 08:23 AM
The pricing for the AMD Radeon 300 Series pricing leaked onto the web, from Radeon R7 370 to R9 390 that is. ...


42 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Keesberenburg
Senior Member



Posts: 877
Joined: 2013-01-11

#5100629 Posted on: 06/19/2015 08:55 AM
With a 100mhz oc on the fury x.

thefather
Member



Posts: 23
Joined: 2005-03-17

#5100634 Posted on: 06/19/2015 09:04 AM
and so it begins....

Noisiv
Senior Member



Posts: 8201
Joined: 2010-11-16

#5100636 Posted on: 06/19/2015 09:08 AM
They chose settings anywhere between Medium and Ultra.
8 custom game settings used :)

AA going from 0 to 4xSSAA
And Anisotropic Filtering going from 0 to 16, but mostly ZERO.
In 2015. AF=0 !!



Keesberenburg
Senior Member



Posts: 877
Joined: 2013-01-11

#5100639 Posted on: 06/19/2015 09:13 AM
Pro AMD benchmark love it, Nvidia does the same thing somtime if it's not fast enough

Veteran
Senior Member



Posts: 12101
Joined: 2009-01-16

#5100643 Posted on: 06/19/2015 09:17 AM
If Hilbert is saying these are cherry picked and take witha grain of salt then I reckon the fury x is not as good as these benchies show. Its either equal to Ti in some games and below it in other games. That is my prediction. Titan will still beat it in all games.

42 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023