MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
AMD Radeon R9 280 in the works ?
AMD seems to be planning another mainstream graphics card. This time it'll be the non X mode R9-280. The R9 series is based upon the 28 nm "Tahiti" GPU (Radeon HD 7950). The chip would feature 1,792 stream processors, 112 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and a 384-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 3 GB of memory. AMD is looking to release this card in a competitive sub-300 USD price segment.
Other then that there are no real specs but you can assume clock frequencies above 850 MHz on the core with roughly 5.00 GHz (GDDR5-effective) on the memory.
« GeForce GTX TITAN Black Pictured (again) · AMD Radeon R9 280 in the works ?
· ASUS launches M70AD Desktop PC »
AMD silently injects AMD Radeon R7 250X - 02/10/2014 09:00 AM
The R7 Series has garnereed significant attention in the market with a wide number of board designs available from our AIB partners, providing more choice for consumers. There continues to be a strong...
Guru3D Christmas Contest 2013 - Win an AMD Radeon R9 290X - 12/27/2013 08:08 AM
It's Christmas week 2013 and that traditionally means we start-up contests here at Guru3D.com This year we have three competititions and in this specific one you will be on a queste to win an AMD Rad...
AMD Radeon R9 260 and R9 255 for OEMs - 12/27/2013 08:03 AM
Correct... R9. AMD is spinning around with GPUs and will introduce two sub-$180 graphics cards specifically for OEMs. It is the the "Cape Verde" based Radeon R9 255 and the "Bonaire...
AMD Radeon R7-260 tested and reviewed - 12/17/2013 03:38 PM
For this review we'll look at the AMD Radeon R7-260, a budget Curacao Pro core based graphics card which has a total of 768 Stream processors, a compute performance of 1.54 TFlops, 1 GB of GDDR5 memo...
AMD Radeon R7 260 GPU - 12/17/2013 09:04 AM
AMD today released an entry-level GPU. It's the little borther of the 260X, the 260. The Radeon R7 260 is fitted with a Curacao Pro core which has cut down specifications with a total of 768 Stream...
huilun02
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2013-10-29
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2013-10-29
#4764348 Posted on: 02/12/2014 01:37 PM
They should've just kept the 7950 in production and rake in the cash from the sub $300 market. Better late than never I guess. 3gb of vram with just the basic card is a nice bonus, and hopefully it will have the 7950's overclocking potential as well.
They should've just kept the 7950 in production and rake in the cash from the sub $300 market. Better late than never I guess. 3gb of vram with just the basic card is a nice bonus, and hopefully it will have the 7950's overclocking potential as well.
WolfPT
Senior Member
Posts: 103
Joined: 2013-02-23
Senior Member
Posts: 103
Joined: 2013-02-23
#4764349 Posted on: 02/12/2014 01:38 PM
Keep milking it AMD...
Keep milking it AMD...
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 5646
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 5646
Joined: 2012-11-10
#4764398 Posted on: 02/12/2014 03:27 PM
If they tweak something like fabrication size or find a way to make it slightly more power efficient then I'm fine with a re-brand here and there. But if its 100% identical but with a different name, that's pretty dumb.
What I don't get is the idiotic naming scheme. Ditch X in 290X and 280X and give them different product numbers. If they've only got 4 GPUs for the entire R9 series, why are they just using the last couple digits? If the argument is "so you don't think the product is worse than the GPUs from the R7 seies" then why did they even bother creating an R7 and R9?
I hate marketing.
If they tweak something like fabrication size or find a way to make it slightly more power efficient then I'm fine with a re-brand here and there. But if its 100% identical but with a different name, that's pretty dumb.
What I don't get is the idiotic naming scheme. Ditch X in 290X and 280X and give them different product numbers. If they've only got 4 GPUs for the entire R9 series, why are they just using the last couple digits? If the argument is "so you don't think the product is worse than the GPUs from the R7 seies" then why did they even bother creating an R7 and R9?
I hate marketing.
Pill Monster
Senior Member
Posts: 25216
Joined: 2007-08-23
Senior Member
Posts: 25216
Joined: 2007-08-23
#4764404 Posted on: 02/12/2014 03:36 PM
Seems relevant
...
Seems relevant

Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 12622
Joined: 2003-05-11
Need to change that Nvidia milking pic to AMD.