Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
ASUS ROG Thor 1000W Platinum II (1000W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WIFI6E router review
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
AMD Radeon R9 280 in the works ?
AMD seems to be planning another mainstream graphics card. This time it'll be the non X mode R9-280. The R9 series is based upon the 28 nm "Tahiti" GPU (Radeon HD 7950). The chip would feature 1,792 stream processors, 112 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and a 384-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 3 GB of memory. AMD is looking to release this card in a competitive sub-300 USD price segment.
Other then that there are no real specs but you can assume clock frequencies above 850 MHz on the core with roughly 5.00 GHz (GDDR5-effective) on the memory.
« GeForce GTX TITAN Black Pictured (again) · AMD Radeon R9 280 in the works ?
· ASUS launches M70AD Desktop PC »
AMD silently injects AMD Radeon R7 250X - 02/10/2014 10:00 AM
The R7 Series has garnereed significant attention in the market with a wide number of board designs available from our AIB partners, providing more choice for consumers. There continues to be a strong...
Guru3D Christmas Contest 2013 - Win an AMD Radeon R9 290X - 12/27/2013 09:08 AM
It's Christmas week 2013 and that traditionally means we start-up contests here at Guru3D.com This year we have three competititions and in this specific one you will be on a queste to win an AMD Rad...
AMD Radeon R9 260 and R9 255 for OEMs - 12/27/2013 09:03 AM
Correct... R9. AMD is spinning around with GPUs and will introduce two sub-$180 graphics cards specifically for OEMs. It is the the "Cape Verde" based Radeon R9 255 and the "Bonaire...
AMD Radeon R7-260 tested and reviewed - 12/17/2013 04:38 PM
For this review we'll look at the AMD Radeon R7-260, a budget Curacao Pro core based graphics card which has a total of 768 Stream processors, a compute performance of 1.54 TFlops, 1 GB of GDDR5 memo...
AMD Radeon R7 260 GPU - 12/17/2013 10:04 AM
AMD today released an entry-level GPU. It's the little borther of the 260X, the 260. The Radeon R7 260 is fitted with a Curacao Pro core which has cut down specifications with a total of 768 Stream...
huilun02
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2013-10-29
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2013-10-29
#4764348 Posted on: 02/12/2014 02:37 PM
They should've just kept the 7950 in production and rake in the cash from the sub $300 market. Better late than never I guess. 3gb of vram with just the basic card is a nice bonus, and hopefully it will have the 7950's overclocking potential as well.
They should've just kept the 7950 in production and rake in the cash from the sub $300 market. Better late than never I guess. 3gb of vram with just the basic card is a nice bonus, and hopefully it will have the 7950's overclocking potential as well.
WolfPT
Senior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: 2013-02-23
Senior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: 2013-02-23
#4764349 Posted on: 02/12/2014 02:38 PM
Keep milking it AMD...
Keep milking it AMD...
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 6561
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 6561
Joined: 2012-11-10
#4764398 Posted on: 02/12/2014 04:27 PM
If they tweak something like fabrication size or find a way to make it slightly more power efficient then I'm fine with a re-brand here and there. But if its 100% identical but with a different name, that's pretty dumb.
What I don't get is the idiotic naming scheme. Ditch X in 290X and 280X and give them different product numbers. If they've only got 4 GPUs for the entire R9 series, why are they just using the last couple digits? If the argument is "so you don't think the product is worse than the GPUs from the R7 seies" then why did they even bother creating an R7 and R9?
I hate marketing.
If they tweak something like fabrication size or find a way to make it slightly more power efficient then I'm fine with a re-brand here and there. But if its 100% identical but with a different name, that's pretty dumb.
What I don't get is the idiotic naming scheme. Ditch X in 290X and 280X and give them different product numbers. If they've only got 4 GPUs for the entire R9 series, why are they just using the last couple digits? If the argument is "so you don't think the product is worse than the GPUs from the R7 seies" then why did they even bother creating an R7 and R9?
I hate marketing.
Pill Monster
Senior Member
Posts: 25214
Joined: 2007-08-23
Senior Member
Posts: 25214
Joined: 2007-08-23
#4764404 Posted on: 02/12/2014 04:36 PM
Seems relevant
...
Seems relevant

Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 12783
Joined: 2003-05-11
Need to change that Nvidia milking pic to AMD.