MSI MEG X299 Creation motherboard review
Deepcool Gammaxx L240 AIO review
Guru3D Winter 2018-2019 PC Buyers Guide
URCDkey Spring Sale(up to 86% off) Windows 10 Pro $11
Far Cry New Dawn PC graphics performance benchmark review
WD Black SN750 NVME SSD (1TB) Review
Battlefield V: DLSS PC Performance Update
Metro Exodus: PC graphics performance benchmarks
Team Group Delta S TUF RGB SSD Review
T-Force Delta TUF Gaming RGB Memory Review
AMD Launches GodAvari FreeSync compatible A10-7870K APU
AMD announces its FreeSync compatible A10-7870K APU, also known under project codename Godavari. The A10-7870K APU, a quad-core CPUs with eight activated Radeon cores totaling towards 512 shader processors. The APU memory controller these days supports up to DDR3-2133 and 2400 MHz with selected memory MHz memory speeds.
So with Godavari people had silent hopes that this would be a new APU architecture, nope. It was merely a project name that got blown our of proportions on the web, by the usual websites. The AMD A10-7870K Black Edition (Godavari) Flagship APU now is released. Retailers are listing this APU which will cost around a 140 USD and 129 USD for OEMs. You will have noticed that this SKU is using the 7800 series naming, not 8000 as earlier expected and rumored.
Godvari architecture is in fact an update to what you guys have known and learned as the Kaveri / Excavator architecture CPU cores combined with Graphics CoreNext 1.2 based stream processors seated into the integrated GPU inside the APU.It will support higher speed DDR3 controllers allowing 2133 MHz as default using up-to 2400 MHz with AMD affiliated memory. There will be up to four x86 cores to be more specific, along with up to 512 stream processors per integrated graphics processing unit. The sheer difference for the 7870K will be that is is tweaked to be faster, the APU with a newer stepping will have a 3.9 GHz baseclock and can turbo on its dynamic boost clock frequency towards 4.1 GHz. The integrated graphics is a notch faster as well, coming from 720 MHz it is now clocked at 866 MHz.
The latest iteration will be compatible with FreeSync monitors.
AMD Launches New LiquidVR Technology - 03/04/2015 03:03 PM
AMD announced an initiative to deliver the best possible VR experience for developers and users through new AMD technologies and partnerships....
AMD launches $999 Radeon R9 295X2 promo - 09/03/2014 07:39 AM
It's a pretty good price of you ask me. AMD offers a Radeon R9 295X2 promotion and is selling this dual-gpu card for $999,. That saves 33.3% off the card from its original 1,499 launch price....
AMD Launches FirePro W8100 Professional Graphics Card - 06/23/2014 02:33 PM
AMD today launched the AMD FirePro W8100 professional graphics card, enabling new levels of workstation performance delivered by the company's second generation, industry-leading AMD Graphics Core Ne...
AMD Launches 2nd Generation Embedded R-Series APUs and CPUs - 05/20/2014 07:22 AM
AMD today announced the 2nd generation AMD Embedded R-series accelerated processing unit (APU) and CPU family (previously codenamed "Bald Eagle") for embedded applications. The new solutio...
Will AMD Launch a new Single-GPU Card This Summer against GTX 780 Ti ? - 05/12/2014 08:09 AM
Over the weekend a lot of chatter started on the web and in our forums as at several sources report a new AMD SKU being in development. Basically AMD would be set to release a new graphics card that i...
vbetts
Moderator
Posts: 14126
Joined: 2006-07-04
Moderator
Posts: 14126
Joined: 2006-07-04
#5082885 Posted on: 05/28/2015 05:11 PM
Wonder how this new stepping will overclock. The 7850 overclocks pretty decently.
Wonder how this new stepping will overclock. The 7850 overclocks pretty decently.
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1370
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1370
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5083072 Posted on: 05/28/2015 09:15 PM
If even a thing like this gets GCN 1.2, there's no way the 300 series video cards wouldn't. I guess I can consider them after all. As old as they are, rebranded, they would still be newer than my current ancient card.
If even a thing like this gets GCN 1.2, there's no way the 300 series video cards wouldn't. I guess I can consider them after all. As old as they are, rebranded, they would still be newer than my current ancient card.
icedman
Senior Member
Posts: 838
Joined: 2013-02-22
Senior Member
Posts: 838
Joined: 2013-02-22
#5083135 Posted on: 05/28/2015 10:48 PM
Has overclocking on these apu's been fixed since Richland? I had some weird throttling issues on the 5800k. Very fun platform to mess with tho.
Has overclocking on these apu's been fixed since Richland? I had some weird throttling issues on the 5800k. Very fun platform to mess with tho.
CalculuS
Senior Member
Posts: 2982
Joined: 2014-07-28
Senior Member
Posts: 2982
Joined: 2014-07-28
#5083139 Posted on: 05/28/2015 10:51 PM
I would love to see benchmarks on this apu + difference in fps when RAM is overclocked or not.
Will you do a review on this one HH?
I would love to see benchmarks on this apu + difference in fps when RAM is overclocked or not.
Will you do a review on this one HH?
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 8393
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 8393
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5083406 Posted on: 05/29/2015 05:25 AM
Most of a10-7850k had trouble keeping CPU cores at full speed in case you used GPU, but considering all those efficiency things AMD is pulling and increased GPU clocks here, it may be more stable.
But I do not think it will keep OC if you put load on GPU as all their slides show quite a lot of TDP being shared between CPU and GPU part.
It will be same with mobile carrizo. 35W very good CPU performance at that, very good GPU performance too. But once both used one will not be fully fed (or both since they have that balanced TDP slide).
I would prefer to have special 45W turbo where both CPU and GPU would perform at peak performance. (No OC, just no degradation.)
Has overclocking on these apu's been fixed since Richland? I had some weird throttling issues on the 5800k. Very fun platform to mess with tho.
Most of a10-7850k had trouble keeping CPU cores at full speed in case you used GPU, but considering all those efficiency things AMD is pulling and increased GPU clocks here, it may be more stable.
But I do not think it will keep OC if you put load on GPU as all their slides show quite a lot of TDP being shared between CPU and GPU part.
It will be same with mobile carrizo. 35W very good CPU performance at that, very good GPU performance too. But once both used one will not be fully fed (or both since they have that balanced TDP slide).
I would prefer to have special 45W turbo where both CPU and GPU would perform at peak performance. (No OC, just no degradation.)
icedman
Senior Member
Posts: 838
Joined: 2013-02-22
Senior Member
Posts: 838
Joined: 2013-02-22
#5084244 Posted on: 05/29/2015 11:16 PM
That's too bad you would think they'd allow power limit adjustments on the k series desktop models just think 1 chip doing both cpu and graphics under water could be fun.
That's too bad you would think they'd allow power limit adjustments on the k series desktop models just think 1 chip doing both cpu and graphics under water could be fun.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 60
Joined: 2014-01-30
The CPU core frequency boost isn't much to get excited about however the 20% increase to the GPU core frequency sounds fairly significant especially when paired with the improved DDR3 bandwidth.
It will be interesting how this affects dual graphics benchmarks now that the frequency difference between the integrated and discreet graphics cores has been reduced.