A Listing Indicates the Arrival of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
A file with South Korea's National Radio Research Agency (RRA), which certifies gear marketed globally, implies that AMD's Radeon RX 6750 XT may be on the way.
According to a well-known hardware investigator @harujaze6179, Tul Corp., the owner of the PowerColor brand, has put its Radeon RX 6750 XT to RRA's database. The card is officially identified as the PowerColor RX 6750 XT Devil D6 12GB, which confirms that the RX 6750 model does exist and that the aforementioned exists. Meanwhile, the Devil moniker denotes a custom graphics card with standard PowerColor features such as a complex printed circuit board (PCB) outfitted with an upgraded voltage regulating module (VRM) and a high-end cooling system.
The specifications of the graphics card are unknown, but previous leaks indicate that the primary difference between the Radeon RX 6750 XT and the standard RX 6700 XT is the use of GDDR6 memory with an 18 GT/s data transfer rate (vs. 16 GT/s), which provides the GPU with an additional 12.5 percent memory bandwidth. While we can only speculate, PowerColor's 'Devil' VRM architecture may provide the graphics processors with a higher-quality power supply, resulting in faster out-of-the-box clock speeds and greater overclocking potential. Is it going to be one of the best gaming graphics cards available? Only laboratory tests will reveal the truth.
AMD is also expected to release the Radeon RX 6950 XT and Radeon RX 6650 XT in late April, alongside the Radeon RX 6750 XT. The launch date should be taken with a grain of salt because the company has not confirmed such plans in writing.
Senior Member
Posts: 3292
Joined: 2013-03-10
During the Fury and Vega era AMD's extra strong marketing and hype building ended up backfiring. During the 5000 series the marketing was considerably more conservative, which was also understandable due to the lack of a real flagship product. Now they have one, in the 6000 series, but I personally think they still kept the marketing toned down and did what they could to avoid excessive hype. So, these kind of minor versions with marginal performance advantages going without extravagant marketing would be natural, if I'm indeed correct.
But then again, nobody actually needed to invest heavily in GPU marketing during the mining craze.
Senior Member
Posts: 5846
Joined: 2013-02-05
If the difference is just an increase in memory bandwidth of 2GT/s, then the performance increase will be minor. Maybe something around 5%, at best.
Not much to brag about in the GPU market.
Senior Member
Posts: 20752
Joined: 2008-08-28
If the difference is just an increase in memory bandwidth of 2GT/s, then the performance increase will be minor. Maybe something around 5%, at best.
Not much to brag about in the GPU market.
5% increase is fairly regular in this market. Just look at 3090ti.
Senior Member
Posts: 5846
Joined: 2013-02-05
Exactly. And nVidia didn't even bother to make a fuss about it's launch. They didn't even send cards to most reviewers.
Senior Member
Posts: 20752
Joined: 2008-08-28
Its strange amd didnt confirm anything so close to the release. I guess overclocking memory on a existing product and calling it new isnt so exciting.