Zadak Spark RGB DDR4 4133 MHz 4x 8 GB review
Addlink S70 1TB NVMe M.2 SSD review
G.Skill KM360 Keyboard Review
Promo: VIP-SCDKey Games and Windows 10 / Office
Alphacool EISBAER Ex BLACK LCS review
Netgear Nighthawk AX12 Wi-Fi 6 router review
Corsair HS60 PRO Surround Headset Review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 Gaming X review
Team Group Cardea II NVMe 1 TB SSD Review
ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming ITX/TB3 review
3DMark Time Spy Raytracing Benchmark Update To Arrive Next Month
Raytracing, or for us in specific, DirectX Raytracing is going to be a popular topic for the times to come. NVIDIA just announced their GeForce 2070, 2080 and 2080 Ti with Raytracing cores. Meanwhile, some time ago Futuremark announced a Raytracing version of Time Spy. As it now looks, it'll be released next month.
Back then at GDC Microsoft's announcement of DirectX Raytracing coincided with the UL announcement. DirectX Raytracing (DXR) is a new feature in DirectX 12 that opens the door to a new class of real-time graphics techniques for games.
UL (Not Futuremark anymore) now spreads word that the raytracing enabled benchmark will be released with the launch of Redstone 5. Redstone 5 is the Microsoft Fall 2018 OS update, which is expected to arrive late September and will include the DirectX Raytracing libraries.
Practical real-time raytracing for games
Raytracing is not a new technique, but until recently it has been too computationally demanding to use in real-time games. With modern GPUs, it's now possible to use rasterization for most of the rendering and a smaller amount of raytracing to enhance shadows, reflections, and other effects that are difficult to achieve with traditional techniques. The DXR tech demo runs in real-time on current GPU hardware and, because it builds on existing methods, it was relatively easy to implement into the DirectX 12 game engine.
Professional overclocker finds a way to cheat benchmarks like 3DMark TimeSpy - 01/25/2018 09:03 PM
Pro overclocker Ronaldo Buassali, working together with GALAX has published a video in which he shows a way to hide driver settings modifications. This results in false higher end scores. The issue i...
3DMark Time Spy Extreme to be released - updated towards 4K DirectX 12 - 10/02/2017 05:16 PM
Futuremark just provided a new build of 3DMark Time Spy Extreme to media. The download binaries cannot be released just yet but they will update the benchmark with an ultra HD test of Time Spy....
Possible Radeon RX Vega 3DMark Time Spy Benchmark Result - 04/30/2017 04:51 PM
In our forums there have been posted some links towards a 3DMark TimeSpy results, that actually might be Radeon RX Vega. The result shows the card that is running Time Spy with with a score of 5950 po...
Quick Test: 3DMark TimeSpy DirectX 12 Benchmarks - 07/15/2016 11:29 AM
For those that missed the news. it seems that Time Spy, the new DirectX 12 benchmark test from Futuremark is available as DLC right now on Steam, coming soon to all Windows editions of 3DMark. With i...
3DMark Time Spy - DirectX 12 trailer and screenshots - 06/24/2016 07:58 AM
Since 1998 gamers have turned to 3DMark benchmarks to see the latest advances in real-time graphics made possible with each new version of DirectX. That's why today Futuremark is excited to share the...
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5577606 Posted on: 08/24/2018 07:34 PM
Cool, I'm gonna run this at 320x240 on my GTX 1070, should run pretty darn good, don't worry I've done the math!
Cool, I'm gonna run this at 320x240 on my GTX 1070, should run pretty darn good, don't worry I've done the math!
Bojcha
Member
Posts: 75
Joined: 2008-09-23
Member
Posts: 75
Joined: 2008-09-23
#5577607 Posted on: 08/24/2018 07:35 PM
Isn't Direct XR ?
Isn't Direct XR ?
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9739
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 9739
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5577611 Posted on: 08/24/2018 07:37 PM
Don't go there, I was playing ES:Oblivion at 720x480 with all eye candy for a while on notebook just to see hat I am missing at 1280x800.
Cool, I'm gonna run this at 320x240 on my GTX 1070, should run pretty darn good, don't worry I've done the math!
Don't go there, I was playing ES:Oblivion at 720x480 with all eye candy for a while on notebook just to see hat I am missing at 1280x800.
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5577614 Posted on: 08/24/2018 07:43 PM
Ha, I did the same back in praps 2010 or 2011, with a notebook...M1530, overclocked 8600M GT, Crysis 2 at max setting, think it was something like ---x512 (some weird custom resolution I tried!). I soon realised it was too blurry!
Don't go there, I was playing ES:Oblivion at 720x480 with all eye candy for a while on notebook just to see hat I am missing at 1280x800.
Ha, I did the same back in praps 2010 or 2011, with a notebook...M1530, overclocked 8600M GT, Crysis 2 at max setting, think it was something like ---x512 (some weird custom resolution I tried!). I soon realised it was too blurry!
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1628
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 1628
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5577621 Posted on: 08/24/2018 07:54 PM
UL... When you run this benchmark, it will tell if your PC is properly grounded, otherwise up the electrical standards, and all in all safe to use. It might also tell something about the performance.
UL... When you run this benchmark, it will tell if your PC is properly grounded, otherwise up the electrical standards, and all in all safe to use. It might also tell something about the performance.
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16392
Joined: 2012-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 16392
Joined: 2012-05-18
#5577627 Posted on: 08/24/2018 08:00 PM
Someone called it here as a joke.. and Lookilooki xD
Someone called it here as a joke.. and Lookilooki xD
HardwareCaps
Senior Member
Posts: 452
Joined: 2018-05-03
Senior Member
Posts: 452
Joined: 2018-05-03
#5577629 Posted on: 08/24/2018 08:07 PM
Man AMD is not gonna look great in these benchmarks.... I'm starting to think that maybe AMD gave up on consumer graphics
they are doing great in consoles, Ryzen is a strong product and Datacenter/AI is far more profitable.
Man AMD is not gonna look great in these benchmarks.... I'm starting to think that maybe AMD gave up on consumer graphics
they are doing great in consoles, Ryzen is a strong product and Datacenter/AI is far more profitable.
Paulo Narciso
Senior Member
Posts: 1215
Joined: 2007-02-21
Senior Member
Posts: 1215
Joined: 2007-02-21
#5577636 Posted on: 08/24/2018 08:20 PM
AMD sooner or later will release something. Also, there's no game that current cards can't run at decent resolution and framerates. Infact, this year was a really bad year for PC gaming, I don't remember anything special that was released.
AMD sooner or later will release something. Also, there's no game that current cards can't run at decent resolution and framerates. Infact, this year was a really bad year for PC gaming, I don't remember anything special that was released.
vbetts
Moderator
Posts: 14687
Joined: 2006-07-04
Moderator
Posts: 14687
Joined: 2006-07-04
#5577638 Posted on: 08/24/2018 08:23 PM
Just to note, this is running on DXRT not RTX. RTX is the library Nvidia uses for Turing RTX cores to communicate with DXRT, without support it won't use them. The only requirement for DXRT is DX12 level hardware.
Just to note, this is running on DXRT not RTX. RTX is the library Nvidia uses for Turing RTX cores to communicate with DXRT, without support it won't use them. The only requirement for DXRT is DX12 level hardware.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9739
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 9739
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5577707 Posted on: 08/24/2018 11:31 PM
Man AMD is not gonna look great in these benchmarks.... I'm starting to think that maybe AMD gave up on consumer graphics
they are doing great in consoles, Ryzen is a strong product and Datacenter/AI is far more profitable.
Guess what is AMD making for next PS console?
Man AMD is not gonna look great in these benchmarks.... I'm starting to think that maybe AMD gave up on consumer graphics
they are doing great in consoles, Ryzen is a strong product and Datacenter/AI is far more profitable.
Guess what is AMD making for next PS console?
kevnb
Senior Member
Posts: 355
Joined: 2011-06-05
Senior Member
Posts: 355
Joined: 2011-06-05
#5577732 Posted on: 08/25/2018 12:52 AM
Man AMD is not gonna look great in these benchmarks.... I'm starting to think that maybe AMD gave up on consumer graphics
they are doing great in consoles, Ryzen is a strong product and Datacenter/AI is far more profitable.
I dont think they have, they are just having a hard time. They have the traditional console market, but with razor thin margins. Nvidia and Intel both laughed at how little they are making, but maybe amd just wants sony and Microsofts help?
Man AMD is not gonna look great in these benchmarks.... I'm starting to think that maybe AMD gave up on consumer graphics
they are doing great in consoles, Ryzen is a strong product and Datacenter/AI is far more profitable.
I dont think they have, they are just having a hard time. They have the traditional console market, but with razor thin margins. Nvidia and Intel both laughed at how little they are making, but maybe amd just wants sony and Microsofts help?
Unreal--
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2018-04-12
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2018-04-12
#5577742 Posted on: 08/25/2018 01:42 AM
just make everything reflect !
i wana see reflecting mute surface in games.
just make everything reflect !
i wana see reflecting mute surface in games.
ozesniper
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2013-01-07
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2013-01-07
#5577766 Posted on: 08/25/2018 05:29 AM
So I will go from "Your pc is better than 99% of all results" to "You are a console peasant"!
So I will go from "Your pc is better than 99% of all results" to "You are a console peasant"!
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: 2012-10-07
Senior Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: 2012-10-07
#5577768 Posted on: 08/25/2018 05:58 AM
Ah right, does that mean that Turing won't be able to use it's RT cores in this benchmark then? i.e. That means that Turing will not get a massive performance bump (e.g. x10) over Pascal in this benchmark?
EDIT: Sorry, didn't read your post carefully enough - you said that without RTX then the RT cores won't be able to be used - well that sucks. So Turing will not get a massive bump over Pascal beyond the 40-60% supposed basic increase in general rendering power of Turing over Pascal.
Just to note, this is running on DXRT not RTX. RTX is the library Nvidia uses for Turing RTX cores to communicate with DXRT, without support it won't use them. The only requirement for DXRT is DX12 level hardware.
Ah right, does that mean that Turing won't be able to use it's RT cores in this benchmark then? i.e. That means that Turing will not get a massive performance bump (e.g. x10) over Pascal in this benchmark?
EDIT: Sorry, didn't read your post carefully enough - you said that without RTX then the RT cores won't be able to be used - well that sucks. So Turing will not get a massive bump over Pascal beyond the 40-60% supposed basic increase in general rendering power of Turing over Pascal.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3122
Joined: 2008-09-07
ooo