Asrock B550 PG Riptide review
be quiet! Dark Rock TF2 review
Basemark GPU v1.2 benchmarks with 36 GPUs
Corsair MP600 Pro XT PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
10nm Ice Lake (38 Cores) and 14nm Cooper Lake (48 Cores) Xeon CPU Specs leak
10nm for desktop based chips are still on the roadmap, at least Intel debunked that somewhat, however newly leaked slide confirms a thing or two more in the server market as well, including 10nm server processors based on Ice Lake.
A slide originating from Asus lists a number of product characteristics and launch data for Xeons processors. As you can see Cascade Lake products will be succeeded by Cooper Lake in the second quarter of 2020, and here we see Ice Lake-Xeons will arrive in the third quarter. Cooper Lake will fit on the new Socket P + and get a TDP of up to 300 watts. It is striking that the number of cores per socket has doubled to 48 cores, while a maximum of two sockets can fit on one motherboard.
The number of pcie 3.0 lanes has been increased from 48 to 64 lanes (Gen4 for Ice Lake), and the number of interconnects per processor has also increased to 4. The ram now has eight memory channels via ddr4-3200 instead of six channels with a maximum of ddr4-2666. Ice Lake will get the same Socket P + platform, but the tdp has been lowered to 270 watts per processor. The number of calculation cores is also slightly lower with 38 cores and 72 threads, the number of sockets per motherboard is two equal to Cooper Lake. The number of memory channels is equal to Cooper Lake, but there is support for the second generation of Intel's 'persistent memory', or Optane.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 16464
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 16464
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5726108 Posted on: 10/31/2019 05:36 PM
Isnt the upcoming AMD TR 3990x 64/128 280w?
Also even skylake x had more cores than this.
Isnt the upcoming AMD TR 3990x 64/128 280w?
Also even skylake x had more cores than this.
Aekold
Member
Posts: 66
Joined: 2012-12-25
Member
Posts: 66
Joined: 2012-12-25
#5726114 Posted on: 10/31/2019 05:40 PM
Guessing they up the clocks significantly on those cores (especially compared 48-core Cooper Lake on the same chart). Given they're Xeons that will likely be used in VM hosts, I doubt the power draw will ever get to the 270W anyway.
Nice to have a faster option at least, so you can get the speed when you need it. You can always buy the low power, low speed, high core count Xeon if that works better for your application.
270W for 38 Cores!!!! Can someone help me understand how this might actually be good?
Guessing they up the clocks significantly on those cores (especially compared 48-core Cooper Lake on the same chart). Given they're Xeons that will likely be used in VM hosts, I doubt the power draw will ever get to the 270W anyway.
Nice to have a faster option at least, so you can get the speed when you need it. You can always buy the low power, low speed, high core count Xeon if that works better for your application.
Petr V
Senior Member
Posts: 353
Joined: 2018-08-04
Senior Member
Posts: 353
Joined: 2018-08-04
#5726123 Posted on: 10/31/2019 05:57 PM
Wonder if they release 10nm how much ++++ intel make before they skip to 5nm.
Wonder if they release 10nm how much ++++ intel make before they skip to 5nm.
moo100times
Senior Member
Posts: 333
Joined: 2012-06-24
Senior Member
Posts: 333
Joined: 2012-06-24
#5726172 Posted on: 10/31/2019 08:49 PM
Guessing they up the clocks significantly on those cores (especially compared 48-core Cooper Lake on the same chart). Given they're Xeons that will likely be used in VM hosts, I doubt the power draw will ever get to the 270W anyway.
Nice to have a faster option at least, so you can get the speed when you need it. You can always buy the low power, low speed, high core count Xeon if that works better for your application.
Or you can buy an Epyc chip.
Seriously though, I wonder what clock speeds they will obtain with those specs, as I heard rumours ice lake wasn't clocking as well as they hoped at 10nm. Also why 2 different types of server chips?
Guessing they up the clocks significantly on those cores (especially compared 48-core Cooper Lake on the same chart). Given they're Xeons that will likely be used in VM hosts, I doubt the power draw will ever get to the 270W anyway.
Nice to have a faster option at least, so you can get the speed when you need it. You can always buy the low power, low speed, high core count Xeon if that works better for your application.
Or you can buy an Epyc chip.
Seriously though, I wonder what clock speeds they will obtain with those specs, as I heard rumours ice lake wasn't clocking as well as they hoped at 10nm. Also why 2 different types of server chips?
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 168
Joined: 2015-12-18
270W for 38 Cores!!!! Can someone help me understand how this might actually be good?