Corona CPU Benchmark Download v1.3

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/09/2016 07:37 PM [ 41 comment(s) ]

Advertisement

Download the Corona CPU Benchmark. It’s easy to use: save, extract, and run the file. Benchmark starts to render the testing scene automatically and shows the result at the end, with an option to submit the result.

The tool itself is very easy to use, simply save, extract, and run the downloadable file from their site and you can get started.The benchmark itself starts automatically once you run it and it will render it's standard testing scene automatically give us results at the end that we can then use to compare performance between CPUs.

Looking at the user submitted scores on the Corona Renderer website the benchmark has been used in workstation grade systems with up to 72 CPU threads, meaning that this benchmark is made with heavy hyper threading in mind, making it suitable for testing CPUs with both small and large CPU core counts.

We have a forum thread open on this benchmark right here where you can share your results.

Download Locations

Download Corona Benchmark (Author) [ 10137 downloads | Report broken link ]

Download Corona Benchmark (Guru3D EU mirror) [ 5303 downloads | Report broken link ]

2 pages 1 2

cudarenderer
Posts: 46
Joined: 2016-01-23

#5242417 Posted on: 03/09/2016 05:01 PM

i7 4790K @ 4.7GHz and RAM G.Skill @ 2400MHz with default timings but it´s for my brother.

Result: time 3m32s; ray/sec 2,284,740

zoomer-fodder
Member
Posts: 82
Joined: 2014-06-01

#5242521 Posted on: 03/09/2016 08:48 PM

Stealth83
Member
Posts: 82
Joined: 2004-02-03

#5242567 Posted on: 03/09/2016 09:56 PM

Lane
Senior Member
Posts: 6359
Joined: 2005-02-25

#5242644 Posted on: 03/10/2016 12:49 AM

perche24
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: 2005-09-18

#5242645 Posted on: 03/10/2016 12:53 AM

could not run corona 1.3. Your processor doesnt support required features (SSE 4.1)

in a phenom x6 1090 t

-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 15182
Joined: 2012-05-18

#5242691 Posted on: 03/10/2016 01:48 AM

2. a whooping 1sec faster at 4300MHZ cache lol :grin:

primetime^
Senior Member
Posts: 883
Joined: 2013-10-24

#5242726 Posted on: 03/10/2016 03:04 AM

Take that, you guys with newer cpus!
My rank world wide
195 00:03:26 primetime Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5670 @ 2.93GHz 4.2 6 12 12 2016-03-10

mooney4321
Junior Member
Posts: 18
Joined: 2013-03-24

#5242832 Posted on: 03/10/2016 09:13 AM

Corona 1.3 Benchmark

Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished
BTR Scene 16 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4930K CPU @ 3.40GHz
Real CPU Frequency : 4.5
Render Time: 0:02:49, Rays/sec: 2 859 090

ultraex2003
Member
Posts: 96
Joined: 2012-07-26

#5242853 Posted on: 03/10/2016 10:02 AM

5820k @4.0
mem 2400
win 10 pro

ToyTen
Senior Member
Posts: 1218
Joined: 2007-11-01

#5243082 Posted on: 03/10/2016 05:47 PM

sTOrM41
Senior Member
Posts: 500
Joined: 2007-11-14

#5243582 Posted on: 03/11/2016 03:45 PM

Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 9664
Joined: 2008-08-28

#5243747 Posted on: 03/11/2016 08:30 PM

Agonist
Senior Member
Posts: 2659
Joined: 2008-10-13

#5243751 Posted on: 03/11/2016 08:35 PM

Stock I7 - 4930K (3.9ghz) 16GB DDR3@2400mhz

Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished
BTR Scene 16 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4930K CPU @ 3.40GHz
Real CPU Frequency : 3.9

Render Time: 0:03:08, Rays/sec: 2 579 900

You beat me by 9 seconds.
I got 0:03:17 with my 3930k @ 4.1.
With my other X79 I could 4.8, but this Asus is a b*tch to get over 4.1 doing a 126 base clock. It literally will not post if I just do a voltage bump, 100 base, and X46 or X48 multi like my MSI X79.
I really wanna see how I do @ 4.6.

I need to test my i7 3820 @ 4 ghz with this.

Extraordinary
Senior Member
Posts: 18649
Joined: 2010-04-21

#5243769 Posted on: 03/11/2016 09:14 PM

Top FX-8350

lol

Arctucas
Senior Member
Posts: 2039
Joined: 2008-04-08

#5243887 Posted on: 03/12/2016 12:45 AM

OK...

From the site:

'Installation and Use

It’s easy to use: save, extract, and run the file. Benchmark starts to render the testing scene automatically and shows the result at the end, with an option to submit the result to this page. '

Umm... no, it does not.

Extraordinary
Senior Member
Posts: 18649
Joined: 2010-04-21

#5243891 Posted on: 03/12/2016 12:49 AM

OK...

From the site:

'Installation and Use

It’s easy to use: save, extract, and run the file. Benchmark starts to render the testing scene automatically and shows the result at the end, with an option to submit the result to this page. '

Umm... no, it does not.

Did you download the free version?
https://corona-renderer.com/stuff/Corona1.3.Benchmark.zip

Arctucas
Senior Member
Posts: 2039
Joined: 2008-04-08

#5243903 Posted on: 03/12/2016 01:12 AM

GREGIX
Senior Member
Posts: 400
Joined: 2004-09-20

#5243913 Posted on: 03/12/2016 01:53 AM

Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished
BTR Scene 16 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5775C CPU @ 3.30GHz
Real CPU Frequency : Undetected
Render Time: 0:03:55, Rays/sec: 2*062*850

TBH cpu is at @4ghz and ram 2133 cl 9

-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 15182
Joined: 2012-05-18

#5243916 Posted on: 03/12/2016 02:01 AM

How is it OC'ing, like by reviews ~4.2 - 4.3ghz or you haven't tested more then 4ghz?

Extraordinary
Senior Member
Posts: 18649
Joined: 2010-04-21

#5244025 Posted on: 03/12/2016 10:13 AM

I clicked the link in your OP.

EDIT:

I downloaded and ran the version from the link you provided above, same result.

I see the application makes (or attempts to make) an encrypted TCP connection to corona-renderer.com (31.31.73.99).

Maybe it needs said connection to register itself, disable whatever blocking software you're using and give it another shot?

Seems to work fine for everyone else, there is no install, just run the exe and it auto starts the benchmark

GREGIX
Senior Member
Posts: 400
Joined: 2004-09-20

#5244110 Posted on: 03/12/2016 04:09 PM

You're the first one I saw with that cpu. :nerd:

How is it OC'ing, like by reviews ~4.2 - 4.3ghz or you haven't tested more then 4ghz?

Tried 4.1, worked. But 4.0 is enough for my needs. Besides...I had problem to achieve that 4ghz anyway, or even all cores 3.7 because 1 option in uefi. I figured out it finally, but OC was pain in ass. Dumb throttling every try.
I got it delided BTW, and used coolabolatory ultra. But my cooler is rather crappy so I little affraid to OC more, as it require more V both on cores and on ring(cache).
Cache is another story, cannot set it up more than 3.4ghz, more results in freezes while gaming(mostly my son games in CS:GO), ofc pushing V should help, but then temps rises too much for me to feel comfortable with it.
One guy from my country(of origin) had problems too, he finnaly found stable 4.13Ghz at 1.3V core or 4.2Ghz with 1.4v, and ring 1.3 at 3,4ghz...witch is killing this cpu. He sold it anyway, and went to skylake.

I am using 1.234V atm and it is good, ring is on 3,4 as said and 1,2v. As looking on web games test this cpu on this speed is faster than HW 4.5ghz, so no need to push it more.

End of OT

primetime^
Senior Member
Posts: 883
Joined: 2013-10-24

#5244303 Posted on: 03/13/2016 12:02 AM

lol they guys in first place have dual XEON E5-2686 V3 (thats 36 cores for both)
Retail around $3,650.00 each or 950 each for Engineering sample's
Speedys cpus by themselves cost over 7k new....god only knows how much the hole pc cost to make? cpus alone cost more than my truck did. People like that have special insurance just for there pc?

Arctucas
Senior Member
Posts: 2039
Joined: 2008-04-08

#5244327 Posted on: 03/13/2016 01:35 AM

Maybe it needs said connection to register itself, disable whatever blocking software you're using and give it another shot?

Seems to work fine for everyone else, there is no install, just run the exe and it auto starts the benchmark

Third times the charm, I guess:

Ch0plol
Senior Member
Posts: 165
Joined: 2013-10-13

#5244476 Posted on: 03/13/2016 02:34 PM

i5 3570k @ 4.3
8GB 2400MHz RAM
Windows 10 x64 Pro

Extraordinary
Senior Member
Posts: 18649
Joined: 2010-04-21

#5244478 Posted on: 03/13/2016 02:51 PM

Third times the charm, I guess:

Nice one

2 pages 1 2

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.