Intel: 10nm slowly coming in 2019, 7nm with EUV is on track

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Intel: 10nm slowly coming in 2019, 7nm with EUV is on track on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/254/254338.jpg
Intel need to get their manufacturing back on track soon because it looks like TSMC are delivering. 7nm is already in production and it looks like they've just announced 5nm will start sampling next year, with full production in 2020. https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20181207PD208.html
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
XenthorX:

Can't solve 10nm and yet 7nm is on track?! Am i Santa or something? 😱
They did solve 10nm now (or claim to), it just takes time to roll out mass production, which is scheduled for end of 2019 now. They did admit that they reached too high with the 10nm process which resulted in the problems. Innovation is always a risk. You may run into something you can't solve quickly, as Intel has learned. Could've been more conservative, but they wanted all the things with their 10nm - and it came back at them.
data/avatar/default/avatar13.webp
They can not even produce in 14 nm and now they will get in 7nm ???? Already put chips to be made in 22nm that were in 14nm. Propaganda for the FANBOYS
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
MK80:

They can not even produce in 14 nm and now they will get in 7nm ???? Already put chips to be made in 22nm that were in 14nm. Propaganda for the FANBOYS
They can produce 14nm they're just struggling to keep up since it's handling all the workload that should've been on 10nm.
data/avatar/default/avatar08.webp
MK80:

They can not even produce in 14 nm and now they will get in 7nm ???? Already put chips to be made in 22nm that were in 14nm. Propaganda for the FANBOYS
They can sell more chips then they can make, not because they suck at making them, but because they are selling way too many of them. One reason of that is that 14nm is sticking around this long, and 10nm was supposed to take over a bunch of the load already, but thats still a year out. There are absolutely no production problems with 14nm, other then capacity.
data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp
nevcairiel:

They can sell more chips then they can make, not because they suck at making them, but because they are selling way too many of them. One reason of that is that 14nm is sticking around this long, and 10nm was supposed to take over a bunch of the load already, but thats still a year out. There are absolutely no production problems with 14nm, other then capacity.
No problem? I've always used intel my whole life and I say I'm tired of being eaten by a fool. I bought the 5.1Ghz 8700K for 350 euros a year I was lucky. Now cost 430 euros and to tell you the truth the 7700K costs 375€ .
data/avatar/default/avatar22.webp
Kaarme:

They still have like 95% of server market. I don't have any numbers for the laptop market, but I'd be extremely surprised if it's not like 80+%. Laptops sell more than desktops these days. Even in the desktop market they still sell more worldwide, I believe, even if at some specific stores AMD might have beaten them occasionally, recently. It will still take a lot more to shake the goliath called Intel.
Laptops yea but server market is going to see changes just at a slower rate than desktops. Security and overall price to performance ratios are much better on EPYC. The server market is just taking a bit longer to shake as many companies have already invested in the Intel product and won't be updating for some time to come. Rest assured the take rate on EPYC is increasing and Intel is aware.
data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp
MK80:

No problem? I've always used intel my whole life and I say I'm tired of being eaten by a fool. I bought the 5.1Ghz 8700K for 350 euros a year I was lucky. Now cost 430 euros and to tell you the truth the 7700K costs 375€ .
That is only a function of capacity and sales. They are selling more then they can make, so the price rises. If you have a factory that can make 1000 a day (arbitrary number!), thats it, no matter how perfect you are. Thats not a sign of any problems with that factory. Building new factories takes a long time as well, so you can't react to these things very quickly, and the long-term plan was to spin up 10nm sooner then it happened. 10nm is the problem, not 14nm. The lack of 10nm causes 14nm to increase in price, thats all there is to it. The delay of 10nm has a ripple effect throughout all of their products.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/261/261894.jpg
Intel... what is this??? Sorry I dont have interesting... I give value to my money...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
Marketing BS to keep the investors quiet.
data/avatar/default/avatar11.webp
this nm race is inverstor talk for consumer all they want simply more-performance, cool, low-power, reliable chips... dont care much about the nm now if u picking a cpu, 10nm cpu but with overheat issue OR 14nm cpu with abit higher power-usage but no overheat issue, which u gonna pick ? what people want with smaller node is more-performance/watt.... but no one gonna pick the one with overheat issue anyway
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/271/271700.jpg
Craigpd:

This is the first mention I've seen of Intel moving to 7nm. And please do correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't even recall any mention of a 7nm move in any of their previous Investor calls, yet alone a move to 7nm EUV. So if this is their way of announcing that they're planning on moving to 7nm, just how long have they been developing this node behind closed doors? All products on the latest roadmaps are expected to be 10nm for their "prosumer" line or 14nm++++++++++ for the things that actually sell. Did we get any indication of when we may expect a 7nm product from Intel? Or are they too cautious to announce a product that early after the 10nm flop?
They were just talking about it at the local bar over a few drinks. They had some good ideas tho.