Intel removes benchmarks conditions for Linux from Eula
Intel has removed the EULA restriction on the Linux microcode for CPUs. The new version no longer contains a ban on benchmarks and performance comparisons. Intel did not explain why that ban was in it.
Intel CEO Imad Sousou this in a tweet, Intel has simplified their conditions of the Linux microcode for distribution. The new conditions are much shorter than the version that Intel drew up earlier and the ban on making benchmarks and performance comparisons have disappeared and cannot be found anymore.
"We have simplified the Intel license to make it easier to distribute CPU microcode updates and posted the new version http://bit.ly/2w9RjtM. As an active member of the open source community, we continue to welcome all feedback and thank the community."
That results in this new excerpt:
Redistribution.
Redistribution and use in binary form, without modification, are permitted, provided that the following conditions are met:
- Redistributions must reproduce the above copyright notice and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
- Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its suppliers may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
- No reverse engineering, decompilation, or disassembly of this software is permitted.
“Binary form” includes any format that is commonly used for electronic conveyance that is a reversible, bit-exact translation of binary representation to ASCII or ISO text, for example “uuencode.”
DISCLAIMER.
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
Intel Releases Updated Graphics Drivers to Support World of Warcraft:Battle for Azeroth - 08/10/2018 08:36 AM
Intel has just released Driver Version 24.20.100.6226 to support the launch of Activision Blizzard’s World of Warcraft®: Battle for Azeroth launch....
Intel responds towards AMD viral exchanging 8086K for a Threadripper 1950X - 06/19/2018 05:43 PM
So that news item we wrote yesterday about AMD creating a bit of a pun by Exchanging your 8086K for a Threadripper 1950X? Well, Intel responded through the Intel gaming Twitter account (which 'were ...
Intel Releases Specs Core i3 i3-8121U and it is 10nm Cannon Lake - 05/16/2018 05:13 PM
It's a mobile CPU used in laptops but still, Intel has added the Core i3-8121U to its ARK website, and that is the first chip produced at 10nm. The Core i3-8121U is a dual-core processor with a 2.2 ...
Intel reportedly suspends H310 supply on tight 14nm capacity - 05/09/2018 07:49 AM
Intel's new-generation H310 desktop processors fabricated on 14nm process reportedly have run out of supply in less than one month after the chipset was launched in early April 2018, with sources fro...
Intel Retires Kaby Lake-X-processors After launching them just 10 months ago - 05/01/2018 02:32 PM
Intel will be retiring their Kaby Lake-X-processors, the i5-7640X and i7-7740X where the outsiders on the X299 platform. That means that ten months after introducing them, both quad-core processors...
Senior Member
Posts: 425
Joined: 2017-12-11
Thanks Lord for the power of the internet , sneaky Intel hahaha .
Senior Member
Posts: 2259
Joined: 2005-03-26
Yep, you cannot hide, someone will find you out

Senior Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: 2014-11-19
Are they seriously paying people to come up with these ideas, only to disregard them the next day??
Senior Member
Posts: 6680
Joined: 2012-11-10
I think the more concerning problem is they're so used to patting themselves on the back that they honestly had no idea such an EULA was going to piss people off. Someone must have reviewed and approved it before sending it out, and yet nobody at Intel questioned how stupid, antagonistic, or destructive this could've been.
Senior Member
Posts: 2512
Joined: 2016-08-01
Damage control was fast with this one...what i do not get is that in2018 you can not hide such changes people put em under the microscope...and everytime big companies end up with a big whoops ...am i the onlyone that think going forward and honest will be more beneficial ? I mean....if there is big perfomance hit there is no covering it even if you sell your soul to the devil....