Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
Corsair 2000D RGB Airflow Mini-ITX - PC chassis review
ASUS PG27AQDM Review - 240Hz 1440p OLED monitor
Review: ASUS GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II TOP
We'll test and review the GeForce GTX 660 Ti DCUII TOP from ASUS. The GeForce GTX 660 DirectCU II TOP edition is factory overclocked pretty high towards 1058 MHz on the core with a boost frequency of 1137'ish. The memory has been kept the same though at 6008 MHz (effective datarate). The card has been equipped with 2GB of graphics memory (on a 192-bit wise memory bus) and is pimped out and custom cooled.
Read the full Guru3D review right here.
« Sui Generis pre-alpha combat · Review: ASUS GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II TOP
· Steam for Linux Beta Launches with 26 Titles »
Review: MX-Technology MX-ES USB 3.0 SLC flash drive - 10/29/2012 02:02 PM
Something tiny and simple today. We review the MX-Technology MX-ES USB 3.0 SLC flash drive, a USB 3.0 stick equipped with SLC NAND Flash memory allowing it to boast speeds up-to 160MB/s for read and writes !
Review: AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 processor performance - 10/26/2012 07:13 AM
Earlier this week the AMD FX 8350 processor launched, in this review we'll look at all four processors, the AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 in a easy to read performance review. This article is nothing more then a performance overview of all four processors released earlier this week. So this article is basically functions as a performance chart overview.
Review: AMD FX 8350 processor - 10/23/2012 12:08 PM
In this article we test and review the new AMD FX 8350 processor. AMD unleashes PileDriver cores on the new Vishera a codenamed architecture.
Review: MSI GeForce GTX 660 HAWK Edition - 10/23/2012 12:07 PM
We review the MSI GeForce GTX 660 HAWK graphics card in this article. The all customiuzed MSI HAWK is released in the mid-range segment, yet received a high-end treatment from MSI.
Review: Gigabyte GA-F2A85X UP4 motherboard - 10/08/2012 06:36 AM
In this review slash article we test Gigabyte's GA-F2A85X UP4 motherboard. A motherboard that is intended for the Trinity APU architecture processors from AMD will offer tremendous value for money wh...
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 46366
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 46366
Joined: 2000-02-22
#4448892 Posted on: 11/07/2012 01:52 PM
This review was already written and done before the Beta driver came out. Once AMD updates to WHQL we will retest all Radeon 7000 cards and upgrade the charts.
But valid point, the R7000 cards with the new driver will be a hint faster.
Is there a reason why 12.11 beta drivers were not used in this test against 660 Ti? Kind of misleading information if you ask me?
This review was already written and done before the Beta driver came out. Once AMD updates to WHQL we will retest all Radeon 7000 cards and upgrade the charts.
But valid point, the R7000 cards with the new driver will be a hint faster.
Rillipiru
Senior Member
Posts: 315
Joined: 2007-06-29
Senior Member
Posts: 315
Joined: 2007-06-29
#4448893 Posted on: 11/07/2012 01:52 PM
All sprite, thank you
All sprite, thank you
kzinti1
Senior Member
Posts: 63
Joined: 2010-01-30
Senior Member
Posts: 63
Joined: 2010-01-30
#4449189 Posted on: 11/07/2012 08:38 PM
This review was already written and done before the Beta driver came out. Once AMD updates to WHQL we will retest all Radeon 7000 cards and upgrade the charts.
But valid point, the R7000 cards with the new driver will be a hint faster.
What do AMD drivers have to do with this Nvidia videocard? You've completely lost me.
"Honestly I'm not sure whether or not you should invest in the TOP model of this card. A 'regular' DirectCU II version is available as well, simply crank open the power limiter and both cards will perform roughly equal. This is the problem with NVIDIA's severe and strict limitations. Most cards from any brand will perform roughly the same with the difference being a couple of frames per second here and there."
This is exactly the same conclusion I reached when Nvidia started throttling the voltages of their, (actually OUR) cards.
It seems to me that they have set themselves up to lose quite a bit of money by doing this. After all, why buy a more expensive card when we can just take their el cheapo models and bring them up to almost exactly the same levels of their overpriced, yet still underperforming, voltage locked cards that have a minimal OC performed at the factory?
What little OCability that's left, can easily be done at home by anyone. Also, for practically the same price, we can buy 2 of their cheaper cards and get better performance by using SLi. Nvidia will still lose money and we can gain better performance from 2 cards than a single high-priced model card.
Nvidia's voltage lock is a lose-lose situation. For them. It's a winning situation for us!
Way to go, Nvidia! You screwed us over and now we've turned this into a winning solution for overclockers. Good job!
This review was already written and done before the Beta driver came out. Once AMD updates to WHQL we will retest all Radeon 7000 cards and upgrade the charts.
But valid point, the R7000 cards with the new driver will be a hint faster.
What do AMD drivers have to do with this Nvidia videocard? You've completely lost me.
"Honestly I'm not sure whether or not you should invest in the TOP model of this card. A 'regular' DirectCU II version is available as well, simply crank open the power limiter and both cards will perform roughly equal. This is the problem with NVIDIA's severe and strict limitations. Most cards from any brand will perform roughly the same with the difference being a couple of frames per second here and there."
This is exactly the same conclusion I reached when Nvidia started throttling the voltages of their, (actually OUR) cards.
It seems to me that they have set themselves up to lose quite a bit of money by doing this. After all, why buy a more expensive card when we can just take their el cheapo models and bring them up to almost exactly the same levels of their overpriced, yet still underperforming, voltage locked cards that have a minimal OC performed at the factory?
What little OCability that's left, can easily be done at home by anyone. Also, for practically the same price, we can buy 2 of their cheaper cards and get better performance by using SLi. Nvidia will still lose money and we can gain better performance from 2 cards than a single high-priced model card.
Nvidia's voltage lock is a lose-lose situation. For them. It's a winning situation for us!
Way to go, Nvidia! You screwed us over and now we've turned this into a winning solution for overclockers. Good job!
mohiuddin
Senior Member
Posts: 982
Joined: 2010-11-06
Senior Member
Posts: 982
Joined: 2010-11-06
#4449679 Posted on: 11/08/2012 02:16 PM
any review on how 7850HD do with a 12.11 ? or any owner here?
any review on how 7850HD do with a 12.11 ? or any owner here?
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 315
Joined: 2007-06-29
Is there a reason why 12.11 beta drivers were not used in this test against 660 Ti? Kind of misleading information if you ask me?
Asus 660 Ti review
660 Ti review with AMD 12.11 Never settle