Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review

New Downloads
FurMark Download v1.25
MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Final Stable Download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.7
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.0 Final
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download
GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5640 beta
CrystalDiskInfo 8.11.2 Download
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.3 driver download
GPU-Z Download v2.37.0


New Forum Topics
RTSS 6.7.0 beta 1 NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2021 GeForce 461.72 WHQL drivers: download & discussion AMD announces Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB at 479 USD, launches on March 18th MSI has released Motherboard BIOS's for AGESA 1.2.0.0 Intel Re-Confirms March 30 for Rocket Lake-S Launch AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 21.2.3 [Mod Driver] NimeZ Radeon Software - Signature Edition GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download Review: MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO




Guru3D.com » News » Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10

Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/26/2018 07:22 AM | source: | 22 comment(s)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10

Microsoft announced Windows 10 for ARM in December 2016, now a review of a Windows 2-in-1 unit armed with Snapdragon 835-soc reveals the Snapdragon 835 isn't performing well good with x86 programs, compared to even a Celeron N3450 (entry-level laptops and tablets). 

Tests conducted by TechSpot, who posted a review of the HP Envy x2 equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835-soc whos some results with Chrome, Photoshop, Excel, Word, Netflix, Plex, and Steam. A lot of software did not work either. 

Synthetic benchmarks that did work showed that PCMark 8, Cinebench R11.5, x264 HD Benchmark 5, Handbrake and Photoshop would not perform better than a laptop with a Celeron N3450. And since there's are always exceptions, WinRAR 5.0, 7-Zip, Excel and 3DMark did perform better. TechSpot does mention that the battery life of the HP Envy x2 is extremely long, however with a 1000 USD price tag, not relevant for the market.



Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10




« MSI (India) Pretty Much Just Called Radeon GPUs "Sub par" · Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Celeron N3450 Benchmarks With Windows 10 · TerraMaster D5 Thunderbolt 3 RAID Storage Device »

Related Stories

Trump halts Qualcomm takeover by Broadcom for national security - 03/13/2018 07:58 AM
In an unexpected turn of events, the American president Donald Trump blocks the takeover of chipmaker Qualcomm by Broadcom, for reasons of national security....

Qualcomm Introduces Atheros WCN3998 with 802.11ax, WPA3 and Bluetooth 5.1 - 02/22/2018 05:55 PM
While multiple routers are already available with 802.11ax, Qualcomm now announces an 802.11ax network chip that can be used for mobile devices, the successor towards 802.11ac could double or even qu...

Samsung and Qualcomm Working on 7nm EUV Process Technology - 02/22/2018 10:21 AM
Samsung announced the intention to expand their decade-long foundry relationship into EUV (extreme ultra violet) lithography process technology, including the manufacture of future Qualcomm Snapdrago...

Qualcomm rejects Broadcom bid of 121 billion dollars - 02/16/2018 04:45 PM
In what has to become one of the biggest ICT deals ever, American chip company Qualcomm has rejected the bid of no less than 121 billion dollars from its American counterpart Broadcom....

EU Antitrust: Commission fines Qualcomm €997 million - 01/24/2018 02:44 PM
The European Commission has fined Qualcomm €997m for abusing its market dominance in LTE baseband chipsets. Qualcomm prevented rivals from competing in the market by making significant payme...


5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Evildead666
Senior Member



Posts: 1302
Joined: 2003-09-14

#5531608 Posted on: 03/26/2018 09:06 AM
It looks a lot like MS has optimized heavily in Edge and their own software to get this off the ground.
Photoshop though, that is terrible.
Wasn't Adobe Creative Suite one of the Poster childs of this Windows on ARM project ?

Way too expensive for what it is.

rl66
Senior Member



Posts: 2741
Joined: 2007-05-31

#5531629 Posted on: 03/26/2018 11:26 AM
so/so

On other hand it is not where ARM architecture shine...
And where it shine there is already plenty of OSes that already can communicate with Windows if you need it.

mbk1969
Senior Member



Posts: 10450
Joined: 2013-01-17

#5531672 Posted on: 03/26/2018 01:13 PM
But to my understanding ARM processor can`t execute x86 code. So the phrase "Snapdragon 835 isn't performing well good with x86 programs" puzzles me.

Turanis
Senior Member



Posts: 1748
Joined: 2014-08-15

#5531673 Posted on: 03/26/2018 01:14 PM
Plus,Snapdragon is not made it for PC apps.On mobiles he's good SoC.

vbetts
Moderator



Posts: 15107
Joined: 2006-07-04

#5531682 Posted on: 03/26/2018 01:25 PM
Snapdragon is made to be low powered, which correct me if I'm wrong but it does great at that compared to the Celeron?

One thing that I find impressive, is whatever Microsoft has made to run x86 apps on ARM it shows pretty decent results, and apps are actually more than usable! I would love to see this done on say Tegra x1? Or heck, even the Snapdragon 945.

On another note, the Snapdragon 835 can play Rocket League! I mean, not the greatest settings but it can play it!

5 pages 1 2 3 4 5


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021