Fractal Design ION+ Platinum 660 and 860W PSU review
Silverstone Permafrost PF240 liquid cooler review
Intel Core i9 9900KS processor review
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
ASUS PRIME X570 Pro review
ASUS ROG STRIX Scope keyboard review
GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 Super WTF review
ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
NZXT announces its first lineup of audio products for gamers
NZXT has announced its first lineup of audio products for gamers. The full suite includes the AER wired headset with Hi-Res certification, STND headset platform for sleek storage, and MXER audio control station.
All are designed with the clean aesthetic NZXT fans love and expect. AER is a comfortable, lightweight gaming headset available in open and closed-back designs which pairs with STND and MXER for automatic audio switching between the headset and external speakers — a simple solution that feels like magic.
AER SERIES – lightweight wired headsets
- At 291 grams, the lightweight design and Hi-Res Audio certified drivers allow users to play as long as they want with zero ear fatigue to maintain in-game spatial awareness
- Two headset designs available – AER provides enclosed audio and powerful bass, while AER OPEN boosts midrange audio and natural sound for environmental awareness
- Modular design enables left or right attachment of cable and condenser mic, to suit each user’s unique hardware set-up
- 1.8 meter cable may be plugged and unplugged easily for a seamless transition from PC to console play, and from gaming to on-the-go listening
- Nahimic 7.1 Surround – With USB connection, integrated software delivers an immersive, ultrawide soundstage through NZXT CAM
MXER – audio control station
- Precision voice/game mixing with smooth, studio-grade fader
- Nahimic 7.1 Surround – With USB connection, integrated software delivers an immersive, ultrawide soundstage through NZXT CAM
- Wolfson DAC – high-quality 24bit / 96kHz digital-to-analog conversion ensures sonic accuracy
- Automatic switching – Setting headset on the STND while MXER is connected automatically switches audio to your speakers. Removing it from the STND returns audio to the headset
STND – headset platform
- High-quality, powder-coated all-steel frame
- Automatic switching – Setting headset on the STND while MXER is connected automatically switches audio to your speakers. Removing it from the STND returns audio to the headset
Since 2004, NZXT has served as a leader in PC hardware components while expanding to offer additional products and services, including BLD, NZXT’s custom PC building service, and NZXT CAM, a free PC monitoring program. NZXT’s audio lineup is a natural next step in the company’s journey to meet the needs of gamers everywhere. Together, the audio suite makes it easy for gamers, creators and audiophiles to streamline their setup while enjoying lightweight construction, premium sound quality, and modular customization.
“At NZXT, our product development always starts by identifying a hassle gamers face that takes time away from gaming, and we saw an opportunity to bring powerful, elegant solutions to common audio issues,” said Patrick Butler, Product Manager at NZXT. “No one wants to have to follow tedious steps to switch their audio from headsets to their speakers – they want it to happen instantaneously, and our MXER and STND achieve this. Our AER headset in particular is like a Swiss Army knife — users can easily transition from gaming to listening to music in public, swap their mic and cable to be on the left or right side, and choose from open or closed-back designs.”
All NZXT audio products are backed by a two-year warranty. In addition, the lineup is compatible with any analog speaker or wired headset from brands designed for both PCs and consoles.
NZXT Announces N7 Z390 Motherboard: Feature-rich for Enthusiast Gamers - 10/09/2018 07:31 AM
The all-metal motherboard cover perfectly matches the color and finish of your case, creating a visually seamless backdrop for your components. You can’t build a quieter, better-looking syst...
NZXT Announces H700 Nuka-Cola Limited Edition Fallout themed chassis - 08/08/2018 11:26 AM
NZXT today announced a partnership with Bethesda Softworks, a ZeniMax Media company, to deliver the first officially licensed Fallout-themed computer case, the H700 Nuka-Cola. The H700 Nuka-Cola serve...
NZXT announces the acquisition of Forge - 07/31/2018 04:21 PM
NZXT announced the acquisition of San Francisco-based Forge, a pioneer in creating tools for capturing and sharing PC gameplay. Both companies were founded with the goal of developing the PC as the mo...
NZXT Announces Limited Edition PUBG Licensed Case - 05/01/2018 04:10 PM
You think you've seen it all right? NZXT today announced the Limited Edition H700 PUBG mid-tower case, in collaboration with PUBG Corporation and Gamers Outreach, creating the ultimate PlayerUnknown&...
NZXT announces CAM 2.0 PC Monitoring Software - 04/08/2015 07:31 AM
NZXT is proud to announce the launch of its advanced CAM version 2.0 PC monitoring software. Now equipped with double the data detection, a customizable interface and a highly functional FPS overlay, ...
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 3173
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 3173
Joined: 2008-09-07
#5728912 Posted on: 11/07/2019 12:03 PM
I'm too spoilt with my 32bit DAC, 24 is just not gonna cut it for me - nice as these products are.
When are 64bit DAC's going mainstream? I know they are out there in chip form already, but nothing for consumers?
I'm too spoilt with my 32bit DAC, 24 is just not gonna cut it for me - nice as these products are.
When are 64bit DAC's going mainstream? I know they are out there in chip form already, but nothing for consumers?
yasamoka
Senior Member
Posts: 4728
Joined: 2009-08-29
Senior Member
Posts: 4728
Joined: 2009-08-29
#5728950 Posted on: 11/07/2019 02:09 PM
I'm too spoilt with my 32bit DAC, 24 is just not gonna cut it for me - nice as these products are.
When are 64bit DAC's going mainstream? I know they are out there in chip form already, but nothing for consumers?
Forget 64-bit. I've heard that 128-bit is so good you don't even need headphones or speakers to hear the sound waves.
I'm too spoilt with my 32bit DAC, 24 is just not gonna cut it for me - nice as these products are.
When are 64bit DAC's going mainstream? I know they are out there in chip form already, but nothing for consumers?
Forget 64-bit. I've heard that 128-bit is so good you don't even need headphones or speakers to hear the sound waves.
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 3173
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 3173
Joined: 2008-09-07
#5729010 Posted on: 11/07/2019 03:36 PM
Where did you hear that from; I have not heard anything about 128 bit DAC chips?
Forget 64-bit. I've heard that 128-bit is so good you don't even need headphones or speakers to hear the sound waves.
Where did you hear that from; I have not heard anything about 128 bit DAC chips?
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4511
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4511
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5729113 Posted on: 11/07/2019 07:54 PM
I'm too spoilt with my 32bit DAC, 24 is just not gonna cut it for me - nice as these products are.
When are 64bit DAC's going mainstream? I know they are out there in chip form already, but nothing for consumers?
Are you sure you're not confusing bit depth with sample rate? A bit depth of 24 has more dynamic range than what almost any human could possibly notice. Given sufficient equipment and a track with a lot of dynamic range (such as an action movie, or an orchestra), I think the average person could notice the difference going from 16 to 24, but I'm very confident nobody (except maybe a handful of savants) could confidently tell the difference from 24 to 32 in a blind test.
That being said, I'm sure the sample rate is why you enjoy your DAC so much. That, and the overall signal quality it produces. Sample rate determines how much detail is captured in the recording. A sample rate going from 96KHz to 48KHz is very noticeably worse. Sometimes even going from 48KHz to 44.1KHz can be noticeable.
From what I've heard (pun intended), 196KHz adds far more depth than what humans can hear. Some audiophiles ostensibly can tell the difference from that between 96KHz. I think there are DACs that go higher, but that's obviously pointless.
Side note:
I think it makes perfect sense to record audio in uncompressed 32-bit, then step down to a 24-bit FLAC or whatever - much in the same way a professional photographer edits with raw photos but will distribute their content as JPEGs or TIFFs. Once you have the audio levels normalized properly, 32-bit is utterly useless for playback purposes. I can't imagine any situation where your dynamic range will be so wide-spread that having 32-bit would retain any practical (let alone desirable) use for playback.
So, I predict 64-bit audio chipsets will never exist for commercial use. They'll probably exist for scientific and industrial purposes, though. Should a commercial one ever exist, it'll be a placebo marketing scam, like speakers that cost more specifically because they can play sounds at 50KHz.
I'm too spoilt with my 32bit DAC, 24 is just not gonna cut it for me - nice as these products are.
When are 64bit DAC's going mainstream? I know they are out there in chip form already, but nothing for consumers?
Are you sure you're not confusing bit depth with sample rate? A bit depth of 24 has more dynamic range than what almost any human could possibly notice. Given sufficient equipment and a track with a lot of dynamic range (such as an action movie, or an orchestra), I think the average person could notice the difference going from 16 to 24, but I'm very confident nobody (except maybe a handful of savants) could confidently tell the difference from 24 to 32 in a blind test.
That being said, I'm sure the sample rate is why you enjoy your DAC so much. That, and the overall signal quality it produces. Sample rate determines how much detail is captured in the recording. A sample rate going from 96KHz to 48KHz is very noticeably worse. Sometimes even going from 48KHz to 44.1KHz can be noticeable.
From what I've heard (pun intended), 196KHz adds far more depth than what humans can hear. Some audiophiles ostensibly can tell the difference from that between 96KHz. I think there are DACs that go higher, but that's obviously pointless.
Side note:
I think it makes perfect sense to record audio in uncompressed 32-bit, then step down to a 24-bit FLAC or whatever - much in the same way a professional photographer edits with raw photos but will distribute their content as JPEGs or TIFFs. Once you have the audio levels normalized properly, 32-bit is utterly useless for playback purposes. I can't imagine any situation where your dynamic range will be so wide-spread that having 32-bit would retain any practical (let alone desirable) use for playback.
So, I predict 64-bit audio chipsets will never exist for commercial use. They'll probably exist for scientific and industrial purposes, though. Should a commercial one ever exist, it'll be a placebo marketing scam, like speakers that cost more specifically because they can play sounds at 50KHz.
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 3173
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 3173
Joined: 2008-09-07
#5729208 Posted on: 11/08/2019 12:56 AM
So, what you are saying is, 32-bit is better than 24-bit.
So, what you are saying is, 32-bit is better than 24-bit.
yasamoka
Senior Member
Posts: 4728
Joined: 2009-08-29
Senior Member
Posts: 4728
Joined: 2009-08-29
#5729222 Posted on: 11/08/2019 01:52 AM
What 32-bit audio content do you play over your DAC?
So, what you are saying is, 32-bit is better than 24-bit.
What 32-bit audio content do you play over your DAC?
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 3173
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 3173
Joined: 2008-09-07
#5729318 Posted on: 11/08/2019 09:17 AM
I have no idea, but the audio content that is being analysed, is being analysed at greater depth wouldn't you say? Is that not why we have DAC's ? To convert digital into analogue?
What 32-bit audio content do you play over your DAC?
I have no idea, but the audio content that is being analysed, is being analysed at greater depth wouldn't you say? Is that not why we have DAC's ? To convert digital into analogue?
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 5379
Joined: 2011-01-02
Senior Member
Posts: 5379
Joined: 2011-01-02
#5729334 Posted on: 11/08/2019 09:56 AM
More numbers the better, you are right.
Personally I find 16bit/44100hz more than enough with my audio gear, I am human being for god sake. But if you manage to placebo yourself by number, please enjoy it.
I have no idea, but the audio content that is being analysed, is being analysed at greater depth wouldn't you say? Is that not why we have DAC's ? To convert digital into analogue?
More numbers the better, you are right.
Personally I find 16bit/44100hz more than enough with my audio gear, I am human being for god sake. But if you manage to placebo yourself by number, please enjoy it.
kado
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2006-02-03
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2006-02-03
#5729347 Posted on: 11/08/2019 10:56 AM
The DAC is the final stage in audio output, all processing is done before that.
A 24bit audio signal has 144dB of dynamic range, currently there's no circuitry that support such dynamic range. Your DAC even if is "supports" 32bit signals, will be limited by the output circuitry (like the DAC itself, opamps, etc). I think currently the max dynamic range is at 126dB.
Also you need speakers or headphones sensitive enough to to also output those dynamic ranges.
Also Human ears are not that sensitive that can discern audio with such a dynamic range.
I have no idea, but the audio content that is being analysed, is being analysed at greater depth wouldn't you say? Is that not why we have DAC's ? To convert digital into analogue?
The DAC is the final stage in audio output, all processing is done before that.
A 24bit audio signal has 144dB of dynamic range, currently there's no circuitry that support such dynamic range. Your DAC even if is "supports" 32bit signals, will be limited by the output circuitry (like the DAC itself, opamps, etc). I think currently the max dynamic range is at 126dB.
Also you need speakers or headphones sensitive enough to to also output those dynamic ranges.
Also Human ears are not that sensitive that can discern audio with such a dynamic range.
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 3173
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 3173
Joined: 2008-09-07
#5729418 Posted on: 11/08/2019 02:28 PM
The DAC is the final stage in audio output,
A 24bit audio signal has 144dB of dynamic range, currently there's no circuitry that support such dynamic range. Your DAC even if is "supports" 32bit signals, will be limited by the output circuitry (like the DAC itself, opamps, etc). I think currently the max dynamic range is at 126dB.
Also you need speakers or headphones sensitive enough to also output those dynamic ranges.
Also Human ears are not that sensitive that can discern audio with such a dynamic range.
Would you be able to branch that out, because I think it is this which I lack the knowledge on:
My understanding is a basic and simple as this:
Digital Audio Input (an audio, audio/visual file) containing digital audio binary information that needs to be analysedDAC Speakers.
So, where is your processing being done in the above, if in fact I have got this right?
I just do not know where the flaws are in truth, as my (limited) understanding is that: you have digital audio that is analysed by the DAC to convert the digital information in usage analogue information that the speakers understand so they can create vibrations.
The higher the number, the more analysis is done (by the chip) to send to the speakers.
The DAC is the final stage in audio output,
all processing is done before that.
A 24bit audio signal has 144dB of dynamic range, currently there's no circuitry that support such dynamic range. Your DAC even if is "supports" 32bit signals, will be limited by the output circuitry (like the DAC itself, opamps, etc). I think currently the max dynamic range is at 126dB.
Also you need speakers or headphones sensitive enough to also output those dynamic ranges.
Also Human ears are not that sensitive that can discern audio with such a dynamic range.
Would you be able to branch that out, because I think it is this which I lack the knowledge on:
My understanding is a basic and simple as this:
Digital Audio Input (an audio, audio/visual file) containing digital audio binary information that needs to be analysed
=>
=>
So, where is your processing being done in the above, if in fact I have got this right?
I just do not know where the flaws are in truth, as my (limited) understanding is that: you have digital audio that is analysed by the DAC to convert the digital information in usage analogue information that the speakers understand so they can create vibrations.
The higher the number, the more analysis is done (by the chip) to send to the speakers.
Crazy Serb
Senior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: 2015-06-17
Senior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: 2015-06-17
#5730293 Posted on: 11/11/2019 08:36 PM
Can I get 4k resolution and 240fps out of these headphones?
Do they support raytracing?
Etc, etc.
240 fps with CAM installed?! Keep dreaming.
Can I get 4k resolution and 240fps out of these headphones?
Do they support raytracing?
Etc, etc.
240 fps with CAM installed?! Keep dreaming.
Mufflore
Senior Member
Posts: 11370
Joined: 2010-05-22
Senior Member
Posts: 11370
Joined: 2010-05-22
#5730360 Posted on: 11/12/2019 02:49 AM
Would you be able to branch that out, because I think it is this which I lack the knowledge on:
My understanding is a basic and simple as this:
Digital Audio Input (an audio, audio/visual file) containing digital audio binary information that needs to be analysedDAC Speakers.
So, where is your processing being done in the above, if in fact I have got this right?
I just do not know where the flaws are in truth, as my (limited) understanding is that: you have digital audio that is analysed by the DAC to convert the digital information in usage analogue information that the speakers understand so they can create vibrations.
The higher the number, the more analysis is done (by the chip) to send to the speakers.
Processing is performed before it is fed to the DAC.
DAC chips and supporting circuitry have enough noise to prevent needing more than 21bit output.
Any more bits on the DAC chips output serve little other purpose than to give headroom on the volume control before quality is reduced.
Processing can already be done at 64bit or higher independently of the DAC chip, either in a PC or a processor on a DAC.
Dont expect any higher than 32bit DAC chips other than for marketing.
Would you be able to branch that out, because I think it is this which I lack the knowledge on:
My understanding is a basic and simple as this:
Digital Audio Input (an audio, audio/visual file) containing digital audio binary information that needs to be analysed
=>
=>
So, where is your processing being done in the above, if in fact I have got this right?
I just do not know where the flaws are in truth, as my (limited) understanding is that: you have digital audio that is analysed by the DAC to convert the digital information in usage analogue information that the speakers understand so they can create vibrations.
The higher the number, the more analysis is done (by the chip) to send to the speakers.
Processing is performed before it is fed to the DAC.
DAC chips and supporting circuitry have enough noise to prevent needing more than 21bit output.
Any more bits on the DAC chips output serve little other purpose than to give headroom on the volume control before quality is reduced.
Processing can already be done at 64bit or higher independently of the DAC chip, either in a PC or a processor on a DAC.
Dont expect any higher than 32bit DAC chips other than for marketing.
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 3173
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 3173
Joined: 2008-09-07
#5730410 Posted on: 11/12/2019 09:50 AM
Processing is performed before it is fed to the DAC.
DAC chips and supporting circuitry have enough noise to prevent needing more than 21bit output.
Any more bits on the DAC chips output serve little other purpose than to give headroom on the volume control before quality is reduced.
Processing can already be done at 64bit or higher independently of the DAC chip, either in a PC or a processor on a DAC.
Dont expect any higher than 32bit DAC chips other than for marketing.
Wait...the DAC does NOT do any analysis of the file whatsoever?
Processing is performed before it is fed to the DAC.
DAC chips and supporting circuitry have enough noise to prevent needing more than 21bit output.
Any more bits on the DAC chips output serve little other purpose than to give headroom on the volume control before quality is reduced.
Processing can already be done at 64bit or higher independently of the DAC chip, either in a PC or a processor on a DAC.
Dont expect any higher than 32bit DAC chips other than for marketing.
Wait...the DAC does NOT do any analysis of the file whatsoever?
Mufflore
Senior Member
Posts: 11370
Joined: 2010-05-22
Senior Member
Posts: 11370
Joined: 2010-05-22
#5730487 Posted on: 11/12/2019 02:31 PM
A DAC chip converts the signal from Digital to Analogue.
The acronym stands for Digital to Analogue Converter.
It has a set process for doing this which could vary on the bitrate and if it is DSD.
Some can change the volume and some have filters you can change that modify the sound in small ways.
What analysis are you expecting?
Wait...the DAC does NOT do any analysis of the file whatsoever?
A DAC chip converts the signal from Digital to Analogue.
The acronym stands for Digital to Analogue Converter.
It has a set process for doing this which could vary on the bitrate and if it is DSD.
Some can change the volume and some have filters you can change that modify the sound in small ways.
What analysis are you expecting?
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 582
Joined: 2002-12-05
Can I get 4k resolution and 240fps out of these headphones?
Do they support raytracing?
Etc, etc.