Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
ASUS ROG Thor 1000W Platinum II (1000W PSU) review
Nvidia looking into problem high IDLE power usage vs high refreshrate
The IDLE power consumption of Nvidia graphics cards in combination with a GSYNC monitor with a high refresh-rate is much higher compared to regular monitors. Nvidia confirmed the problem and is working on a solution.
During testing of a Asus PG279Q Ryan Shrout from PC Perspective discovered this abnormal behaviour. The 27"-in GSYNC monitor at 165 Hz made his test system use much more power in Idle opposed to your regular PC at a 60Hz refresh-rate.
The power consumption differences in IDLE are massive, at 60 Hz the PC utilizes 74 Watts, yet at 165Hz his PC started using 201 Watts in IDLE, yes that's just displaying your idle Windows desktop.Once you look at the graphics card (in this case a GeForce GTX 980 Ti) the problem becomes abundantly clear, ay 60 Hz the card will have a baseclock of 135 MHz and with 120Hz or higher, the cards kicks in and remains at 885 MHz. The problem only seems to be focusing at GSYNC monitors. Disabling GSYNC does not change the power consumption at 144 Hz.
NVIDIA is looking into this and has found the problem. They will issue a fix with a driver future update.
NVIDIA launches new Bullets or Blade bundle - 10/06/2015 07:24 PM
Gamers that purchase a GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 980 or 970 GPU , or 970M or above notebook will be able to pick up a from copy of either Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege or Assassin's Creed Syndicate for f...
Nvidia launches Quadro M6000 and Quadro VCA 2015 renderserver - 03/20/2015 01:57 PM
Shortly after the GTX Titan X launch Nvidia now releases the Quadro M600 based on the same GM200 GPU, also with 12 GB of vram. Nvidia also is launching a Quadro VCA 2015 renderserver....
JPR AMD Climbs 11% in GPU Shipments in Q2, Intel up 4% NVIDIA Lower - 08/19/2014 09:03 AM
Jon Peddie Research (JPR) announced estimated graphics chip shipments and suppliers' market share for 2014 2Q. Graphics chips are without doubt one of the most powerful, exciting, and essential compo...
NVIDIA Launches K5200, K4200, K2200, K620 and K420 Professional GPU Lineup - 08/12/2014 09:46 PM
NVIDIA today unveiled its next generation of NVIDIA Quadro GPUs -- providing new tools and technologies to meet the visual computing needs of the world's leading designers, artists and scientists. Th...
NVIDIA Launches NVLINK - High-Speed GPU Interconnect - 03/25/2014 07:33 PM
NVIDIA announced that it plans to integrate a high-speed interconnect, called NVIDIA NVLink, into its future GPUs, enabling GPUs and CPUs to share data five to 12 times faster than they can today. Thi...
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5185787 Posted on: 11/09/2015 01:02 PM
Considering average PC user/gamer has it running quite a lot on idle (browsing, watching movie, listening music, ...), I would say this is not nice.
But I am not one to bash it since I am running CPU at permanent 4.5GHz, no power states, nothing to conserve energy. But it eats only 15W more on idle than having speedstep and down-clocking to 1.6GHz.
Considering average PC user/gamer has it running quite a lot on idle (browsing, watching movie, listening music, ...), I would say this is not nice.
But I am not one to bash it since I am running CPU at permanent 4.5GHz, no power states, nothing to conserve energy. But it eats only 15W more on idle than having speedstep and down-clocking to 1.6GHz.
HonoredShadow
Senior Member
Posts: 4290
Joined: 2007-05-27
Senior Member
Posts: 4290
Joined: 2007-05-27
#5185789 Posted on: 11/09/2015 01:03 PM
Is that even worth doing Fox?
Is that even worth doing Fox?
SetsunaFZero
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: 2010-04-10
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: 2010-04-10
#5185792 Posted on: 11/09/2015 01:12 PM
same here every refreshrate over 100Hz clocks my 980ti to 912Mhz. Monitor Benq XL2411Z
I reported this issue more then 3 months ago to nvidia but nobody gave a ****.
With or without G-Sync. If I switch to 2560x1440x144 my GTX 980Ti goes to 963 MHz idle clock. If I stay at 120 Hz it idles at 135 Mhz. Acer XB270HU monitor.
same here every refreshrate over 100Hz clocks my 980ti to 912Mhz. Monitor Benq XL2411Z
I reported this issue more then 3 months ago to nvidia but nobody gave a ****.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5185795 Posted on: 11/09/2015 01:14 PM
When I had 1st i7 with base clock 1.83GHz and turbo 3.2GHz, it did stutter badly based on load as it clocked down and up very often.
With i5 and speedstep I had basically 3 frequencies. Base 1.6GHz (idle), 3.3GHz (standard) and 4.5GHz (turbo). Very aggressive turbo was causing minor stutter, noticeable even on 120Hz.
But locking all 4 cores to 4.5GHz removed it.
So, 15W is small price to pay for removal of CPU clock variation.
Is that even worth doing Fox?
When I had 1st i7 with base clock 1.83GHz and turbo 3.2GHz, it did stutter badly based on load as it clocked down and up very often.
With i5 and speedstep I had basically 3 frequencies. Base 1.6GHz (idle), 3.3GHz (standard) and 4.5GHz (turbo). Very aggressive turbo was causing minor stutter, noticeable even on 120Hz.
But locking all 4 cores to 4.5GHz removed it.
So, 15W is small price to pay for removal of CPU clock variation.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 741
Joined: 2011-03-23
With or without G-Sync. If I switch to 2560x1440x144 my GTX 980Ti goes to 963 MHz idle clock. If I stay at 120 Hz it idles at 135 Mhz. Acer XB270HU monitor.