Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 to get 768 shader cores and 128-bit memory bus
Within the line of expectation there is going to be a GeForce GTX 1050 released, it should be positioned against the RX 460 from AMD. New specifications have surfaced on the web.
The specs have been derived from a GPU-Z screenshot leaked through benchlife that shows pretty much all you need to know as on the rest we can do the math. The card will get 768 shader processors (similar to the GTX 950) and an expected 128bit-mem bus. Interesting though is that it has 4GB of memory, though I expect the normal models top get 2 GB of it.
The TMU count is a little off in the screen-shots. Typically you take the number of SMs and multiply them with 8 texture units, and that this would be 48 (over the 64 shown in the screenshot). The clock frequency is listed at 1316 MHz with a 1380 MHz boost.
GeForce | Titan X | GTX 1080 | GTX 1070 | GTX 1060 | GTX 1050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(2016 edition) | |||||
GPU | GP102-400-A1 | GP104-400-A1 | GP104-200-A1 | GP106-400-A1 | GP107-400-A1 |
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal | Pascal | Pascal | Pascal |
Transistor count | 12 Billion | 7.2 Billion | 7.2 Billion | 4.4 Billion | TBA |
Fabrication Node | TSMC 16 nm | TSMC 16 nm | TSMC 16 nm | TSMC 16 nm | TSMC 16 nm |
CUDA Cores | 3,584 | 2,560 | 1,920 | 1,280 | 768 |
SMMs / SMXs | 28 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 6 |
ROPs | 96 | 64 | 64 | 48 | 32 |
GPU Clock Core | 1,417 MHz | 1,607 MHz | 1,506 MHz | 1,506 MHz | 1,316 MHz |
GPU Boost clock | 1,531 MHz | 1,733 MHz | 1,683 MHz | 1,709 MHz | 1,380 MHz |
Memory Clock | 2500 MHz | 1,250 MHz | 2,000 MHz | 2,000 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
Memory Size | 12 GB | 8 GB | 8 GB | 6 GB | 2/4 GB |
Memory Bus | 384-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit | 192-bit | 128-bit |
Memory Bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 320 GB/s | 256 GB/s | 192 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
FP Performance | 11.0 TFLOPS | 9.0 TFLOPS | 6.45 TFLOPS | 4.61 TFLOPS | TBA |
GPU Thermal Threshold | 94 Degrees C | 94 Degrees C | 94 Degrees C | 94 Degrees C | 91 Degrees C |
TDP | 250 Watts | 180 Watts | 150 Watts | 120 Watts | 75 Watts |
Launch MSRP ref | $1200 | $599/$699 | $379/$449 | $249/$299 | $99 ~ $139 |
Download Nvidia GeForce 372.70 WHQL driver - 08/30/2016 06:07 PM
Download the Nvidia GeForce GameReady 372.70 WHQL driver as released by NVIDIA. This driver provides the optimal experience for World of Warcraft: Legion, Battlefield 1: Open Beta, Deus Ex: Mankind Di...
Download Nvidia GeForce 372.54 WHQL drivers - 08/16/2016 08:54 AM
Download the Nvidia GeForce GameReady 372.54 WHQL driver as released by NVIDIA. nVIDIA GeForce Game Ready WHQL display driver version 372.54. This driver provides optimal experience for No Man&r...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile Spotted - 08/15/2016 09:09 AM
Word for a while now already is that the 1070 and 1080 as a full chip will be used on the mobile segment. That just became a fact as new information regarding a GeForce GTX 1080 being used in a lapto...
Review: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 FCAT Frametime Analysis - 07/19/2016 04:31 PM
For this article we'll test both DirectX 11 and DirectX 12. Recent updates allow us to add the latest DX12 titles into this article as well. To check all this, we revert to our FCAT measuring setup. ...
Download Nvidia GeForce 368.69 WHQL driver - 07/06/2016 03:30 PM
You can now download the all new GeForce 368.69 WHQL driver with updated GeForce Experience. These Game Ready Drivers provide the best possible gaming experience for all major new releases, includin...
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2015-12-20
Should an equally clocked 950 perform similarly?
*that 4GB VRAM just an icing on the cake, imo
Does this based on a stripped down 1060 still?
How would 950 pricing would fit in all of this? Another price cut(yaayy)?
Would this ripple down further to 750Ti or even below? (double yaay)
I demand answers

Senior Member
Posts: 565
Joined: 2016-05-24
Give me passively cooled one and i will replace my 750TI.
Senior Member
Posts: 1121
Joined: 2010-01-04
Can anyone explain why there are two different shader count 1060s? One is 1280 cores, the other is 1152 cores.
This makes NO sense only marketing bull**** again to trick people:
1280 cores = GTX 1060
1152 cores = GTX 1060
768 cores = GTX 1050
This is the way it should have been:
1280 cores = GTX 1060
1152 cores = GTX 1050
768 cores = GTX 1040
Then again this comes from the geniuses who replaced the old TITAN with a new card called TITAN, so when you see machines advertised with a TITAN card you have NO IDEA which one they are including... more marketing trickery?
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: 2010-10-26
fabrication node needs correction. gp107 is at samsung 14nm lpp. That's why the lower clocks
Senior Member
Posts: 3557
Joined: 2007-05-31
more or less the same as gtx950, with more modern architecture and 4g for 75w...
it might be nice
(as gtx950 already beat rx460 in most case the below 150Euro battle is already win)