Kioxia Talks 7-bit per cell NAND
Yeah, TLC 3-bits per cell, PLC at 4-bits, but Kioxia is thinking ahead, at7-bits per cell, to really boost volume sotage for NAND SSDS.
Kioxia, a prominent vendor, demonstrated how multi-value storage technology improved the number of bits that can be held in one memory cell . Kioxia has created an ultra-multi-valued storage technique capable of storing up to 7 bits of data in a single 3D NAND flash cell. During last year's International Memory Workshop, the business presented a multi-valued storage solution that can store up to 6 bits in a single 3D NAND flash cell (IMW 2021). The discoveries reported this time are the result of further advancements in this research.
Similar to the 6bit/cell technology revealed the previous year, the ambient temperature was not room temperature but 77K, which is an environment of exceptionally low temperature. This is done to decrease data read noise. In addition, the material of the channel was changed to epitaxially grown single-crystal silicon. The electrical resistance is lower than that of routinely utilized polycrystalline silicon. The cell transistor's subthreshold properties have been enhanced, and the leakage current has been diminished. In the prototype cell, it was confirmed that these techniques decreased the threshold voltage variance during the write and read operations, allowing the threshold voltage to be written and read in 128 steps equivalent to 7 bits.
While even bigger SSDs likely are be pricey, an overly sophisticated controller could render ultra-high-capacity drives prohibitively expensive and nullify their benefits. Western Digital predicts that even after 2025, PLC 3D NAND (5 bpc) will have little use. Kioxia now proves the physical possibility of storing seven bits per cell and even discusses the eventual storage of eight bits per cell.
Senior Member
Posts: 2979
Joined: 2013-03-10
This is madness! When will it stop? I thought 4-bits was enough already.
Senior Member
Posts: 1825
Joined: 2013-06-04
SSDs are trying to catch up with HDDs density wise. As the speed difference is massive and everyone is transitioning to SSDs, obviously manufacturers want to give reasons for you to upgrade again and again.
Personally I don't mind all the evolution as long as they clearly state on the package what are the full specs of the drive. As long as it lives at least 5 years of heavy usage, sounds good!
Senior Member
Posts: 6664
Joined: 2012-11-10
SSDs are trying to catch up with HDDs density wise. As the speed difference is massive and everyone is transitioning to SSDs, obviously manufacturers want to give reasons for you to upgrade again and again.
Personally I don't mind all the evolution as long as they clearly state on the package what are the full specs of the drive. As long as it lives at least 5 years of heavy usage, sounds good!
Agreed - so long as SLC, TLC, and QLC are still in production, I don't mind going up to 7 bits if it means mass storage for cheap. Not everyone needs a lot of performance, they just need a lot of cheap capacity with high reliability.
SLC will remain good for those who need top performance.
QLC is good for budget drives that suit most PCs.
TLC is a nice in-between.
7-bit will be ideal for archiving and NASes.
Senior Member
Posts: 132
Joined: 2018-04-02
That's impressive and all but what about:
- Speed penalty (write holes ahoy)
- Read/Write endurance.
- Price
I can see this tech making consumer high capacity 2230 M2s SSDs. 1TB exists for this but it's super expensive. This could make it super cheap. However, I hardly see the future of SSDs in high capacities. The prices are still prohibitive... 4TB is still 800$CAD and more. TLC or QLC... it doesn't matter.
Senior Member
Posts: 5519
Joined: 2020-08-03
first make 4tb qlc more affordable