Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 OLED monitor review
ASUS Radeon RX 7600 STRIX OC review
Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
Intel Arc A380 is plagued with software flaws, poor framerates and often unplayable
The first media evaluations of Intel's Arc A380 reveal that it is a trainwreck. Intel never seeded any sample, but just made the product available in China, some websites have gotten their hands on a product. And they're not happy.
We'll go by the way of Germany based ComputerBase, The GPU is clashing with AMD's RX 6400 and NVIDIA's GTX 1650. The driver is also a "construction site," the critic notes. The graphical difficulties necessitate several restarts.
Gaming with Intel’s Arc A380, even with the latest driver, is like living in the middle of a minefield – mind you, playing while drunk. There is no other way to describe the past working days with the Arc A380. You don’t even know where to start. In its current state, it is completely incomprehensible how a large and reputable company like Intel can sell such a product to even a single customer.
In addition, the Arc A380 likes to struggle with stuttering in games that, for example, make Fortnite unplayable despite sufficient FPS. There are a few other titles that suffer from the problem, The Witcher 3, for example, does not run smoothly either. However, frame pacing is generally still a decent job in everyday life with the Intel Arc A380, many games show minor to major problems.
— Wolfgang Andermahr, ComputerBase
As it seems the product is a mess ... is rBAR dependent; on top of that, Arc 380 drivers do not support ReBar on AMD's Ryzen CPUs; the functionality only works with this technology on Intel's own processors. Then it offers bad frametime stutters combined with low-performance and high energy consumption. Outside of China, Intel Arc A380 graphics cards are not currently available for purchase. Arc Alchemist architecture will not be accessible for DIY clients in other locations, according to the business. Below are a couple of screenshots with results courtesy of computer base, as well as a frame time plot from Golem where you can read up on the content.
| Geforce GTX 1650 | Arc A380 | RX 6400 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| chip | TU117 (partially activated) | ACM-G11 (full expansion) | Navi 24 (partially activated) |
| production | TSMC 12FF (DUV) | TSMC N6 (EUV) | TSMC N6 (EUV) |
| transistors/area | 4.7 billion @ 200 mm² | 7.2 billion @ 157 mm² | 5.4 billion @ 107 mm² |
| shaders | 896 (14 SMS) | 1,024 (8 XeCs) | 768 (12 CUs) |
| TMU's | 56 | 64 | 48 |
| Ray Units | no | 8th | 12 |
| GPU clock | 1485/1665MHz | 2,000MHz | 2039/2321MHz |
| video memory | 4 GB GDDR5 | 6 GB GDDR6 | 4 GB GDDR6 |
| interface | 128 bits @ 8 Gbps | 96 bits @ 15.5 Gbps | 64 bits @ 16 Gbps |
| bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 186 GB/s | 128 GB/s + 0.46 TB/s |
| ROPs | 32 | 16 | 32 |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| board power | 75 watts | 75-87 watts | 53 watts |
| PCIe | Gen3 x16 | Gen4 x8 | Gen4 x4 |
Intel Arc A750 graphics card captured Up Close - 07/15/2022 09:16 AM
The A750 shown was found to be the same card that was shown at IEM 2022 in June. This suggests that the card shown was not equipped with the complete ACM-G10 GPU, as was rumored....
Intel Arc A550M and A770M 3DMark Scores Spotted - 07/12/2022 09:01 AM
The to-be-released Intel Arc A550M and A770M mobile graphics cards have recently been seen in Time Spy and Fire Strike Extreme on 3DMark. The Intel Arc Alchemist A550M has an ACM-G10 GPU with 16 Xe co...
Intel Arc Alchemist A770M/A730M benchmarks vs RTX 3060 and 3050 Ti are available - 06/24/2022 09:33 AM
Both are based on the bigger Alchemist ACM-G10 GPU. No sign of RTX 3070 in this comparison, not to mention RTX 3080 or 3080 Ti. And the numbers have been released by Intel themselves....
Intel Arc A380 Performs Pretty Bad with AMD CPUs - 06/24/2022 09:02 AM
A recent set of benchmarks found on bilibili, Intel's Arc A380 cards perform more rancid with an AMD CPU than with an Intel CPU. The card was tested on an ASUS TUF B550M motherboard with 16 GB of DDR...
The Intel Arc A380 desktop GPU seems not as good at gaming as it is in benchmarks - 06/22/2022 08:36 AM
The Intel Arc A380 graphics card for desktops is widely available in China. The RX 6500 XT from AMD and the GTX 1650 from NVIDIA are both better. In DirectX 11 tests, the A380 is 22 to 26 percent slow...
Horus-Anhur
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: 2013-02-05
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: 2013-02-05
#6035490 Posted on: 07/20/2022 06:30 PM
Raja Koduri delivers again
Raja Koduri delivers again
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 1443
Joined: 2014-07-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1443
Joined: 2014-07-22
#6035491 Posted on: 07/20/2022 06:32 PM
Not surprising. I owned no less than three (3) i7xx GPUs after Intel bought Real3D (IIRC) and marketed it for a while until it became evident that the i7xx was not competitive with GPUs by 3dfx and nVidia, even, at the time. I took them all back for refunds. They had an Achilles heel in that they all depended on AGP texturing, which was dog slow because it was limited to the system ram bus instead of having 16MB of onboard ram like Voodoo 3's were blessed with. One of the Intel GPUs had 4mbs onboard ram, then 6mb, then the last one had 8mbs, and because Intel limited the GPU to the system bus it was soundly thrashed by both 3dfx and nVidia GPUs of the day. It was horrible, in other words, and so few were surprised when Intel dropped out of the GPU business entirely. I certainly wasn't surprised at the time. Intel was far more interested in promoting AGP texturing than it was in the GPU markets at the time.
This doesn't bode well for Intel's latest foray, but at least it explains why they aren't yet shipping in the Western markets. Sounds like there's a long wait yet, if ever they do appear in our markets, that is.
Not surprising. I owned no less than three (3) i7xx GPUs after Intel bought Real3D (IIRC) and marketed it for a while until it became evident that the i7xx was not competitive with GPUs by 3dfx and nVidia, even, at the time. I took them all back for refunds. They had an Achilles heel in that they all depended on AGP texturing, which was dog slow because it was limited to the system ram bus instead of having 16MB of onboard ram like Voodoo 3's were blessed with. One of the Intel GPUs had 4mbs onboard ram, then 6mb, then the last one had 8mbs, and because Intel limited the GPU to the system bus it was soundly thrashed by both 3dfx and nVidia GPUs of the day. It was horrible, in other words, and so few were surprised when Intel dropped out of the GPU business entirely. I certainly wasn't surprised at the time. Intel was far more interested in promoting AGP texturing than it was in the GPU markets at the time.
This doesn't bode well for Intel's latest foray, but at least it explains why they aren't yet shipping in the Western markets. Sounds like there's a long wait yet, if ever they do appear in our markets, that is.
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 1443
Joined: 2014-07-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1443
Joined: 2014-07-22
#6035492 Posted on: 07/20/2022 06:33 PM
No, it sounds like an AMD review written by a nVidia shill...
Sounds like an AMD review
No, it sounds like an AMD review written by a nVidia shill...
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 22349
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 22349
Joined: 2008-08-28
#6035496 Posted on: 07/20/2022 06:55 PM
Intel drivers are in an early stage alot of work to be done. For amd it took 10years fixing the drivers to be on nvidia level.
Intel drivers are in an early stage alot of work to be done. For amd it took 10years fixing the drivers to be on nvidia level.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 13042
Joined: 2003-05-11
Sounds like an AMD review