Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming X TRIO review

New Downloads
AIDA64 Download Version 6.70
FurMark Download v1.30
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24
GeForce 512.77 WHQL driver download
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1960
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.1 WHQL driver download
3DMark Download v2.22.7359 + Time Spy


New Forum Topics
GeIL releases DDR5 memory with active cooling and two new RGB fans. Herman Miller and Logitech G Enhance the Embody Chair For Pro Gamers Fine Utilise Power of RadeonPRO Software & SweetFX Part 2 Rumor: AMD to announce X670 Extreme, X670 and B650 Chipsets AMD Patents Automatic Memory Overclocking Tool 5900x or 5800x3D? How to achieve smooth 30 FPS on PC ? Nvidia 516.01 DEV Driver / Cuda Toolkit 11.7 [3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Insight 22.5.1 WHQL Driver Pack (Released) NVidia Anti-Aliasing Guide (updated)




Guru3D.com » News » GrooveShark Shuts Down Services Completely (updated)

GrooveShark Shuts Down Services Completely (updated)

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 05/01/2015 11:37 AM | source: | 55 comment(s)
GrooveShark Shuts Down Services Completely (updated)

Updated content after the break - Big and bad news in streaming land, music streaming service GrooveShark possibly needs to pay 736 million UD dollars (680 million Euro) to the American music industry after a judge rules that the company has been sharing 5000 songs illegal, that would be $150,000 in damages per song with names like Eminem, Green Day and Madonna. 

Reuters reports on this story today that U.S. District Judge Thomas Griesa, who will preside over the trial in federal court in Manhattan, said in a court order on Thursday that because of Grooveshark's actions he will tell jurors they can choose to award the statutory maximum of $150,000 in damages per song. Jurors also could decide to award less. But if the jury awards that amount, Grooveshark's parent company, Escape Media Group Inc, could be forced to pay more than $736 million.

As Reuters reports:

Last September, Griesa ruled that Escape and its founders, Samuel Tarantino and Joshua Greenberg, were liable for the illegal uploads of thousands of recordings by artists such as Madonna, Eminem, Bob Marley and Jay-Z.

Griesa said the defendants had directed their employees to make the uploads in spite of the legal risk. The only question to be resolved at Monday's trial is how much Escape must pay as in penalties for the infringement.

Nine record companies including Arista Music, Sony Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, and Warner Bros Records, sued Escape for infringement in 2011.

Griesa found in September that Escape's business plan was to exploit the copyrighted content in order to grow Grooveshark and then "beg forgiveness" from the labels.

Escape hopes to limit its losses at trial by arguing there were mitigating circumstances to the infringement, according to court papers. In Thursday's order, Griesa said he will allow the company to present evidence of its attempts to secure licenses from the record labels.

Gainesville, Florida-based Grooveshark describes itself as "one of the largest on-demand music services on the Internet" with more than 30 million users sharing over 15 million files. The company says it has a policy to honor copyright holders' "takedown" requests that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

In court papers, the plaintiffs have called Grooveshark a "linear descendant" of Grokster, LimeWire and Napster, all of which had been shut down because of copyright infringement.

A spokesman for Grooveshark said the company had no comment. Representatives for the record labels could not immediately be reached.

--

Update: May 1st 2015

GrooveShark have now shut down their service. You can see their farewell message on the website http://grooveshark.com/



GrooveShark Shuts Down Services Completely (updated)




« Logitech exits OEM mouse production · GrooveShark Shuts Down Services Completely (updated) · Cryorig Releases the H5 Ultimate CPU cooler »

11 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


bemaniac
Senior Member



Posts: 308
Joined: 2009-03-17

#5058723 Posted on: 04/27/2015 09:48 AM
given that they allow you to upload anything which is then instantly seachable and listenable by anyone then of course it's illegal.

fantaskarsef
Senior Member



Posts: 12980
Joined: 2014-07-21

#5058733 Posted on: 04/27/2015 10:11 AM
Same old story. Supplier of infrastructure is responsible for content. Nothing new, I'm just curios when they will move onto the ISP / server suppliers, since they have money, and provide the most basic infrastructure.

Bleib
Senior Member



Posts: 374
Joined: 2013-08-19

#5058734 Posted on: 04/27/2015 10:11 AM
Utterly ridiculous, still for the 2008 economic disaster nobody has been punished.

Extraordinary
Senior Member



Posts: 19562
Joined: 2010-04-21

#5058736 Posted on: 04/27/2015 10:14 AM
$147,200 per song?

Neo Cyrus
Senior Member



Posts: 10061
Joined: 2006-02-14

#5058745 Posted on: 04/27/2015 10:33 AM
$147,200 per song?


In courts they even sue individual people for that amount per song. Let alone a streaming service.

Lawyer: "This song is popular therefore it's worth infinity billion dollars, the 10 seconds she pirated the song costs infinity dollars."

Judge: "Agreed."

11 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022