First GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Benchmarks Leak Online
Somewhere in the Asia region somebody has a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in his or her PC, and a working driver as well as it seems as some performance numbers have revealed itself on the web.
There has been quite a bit of speculation on the GeForce GTX 1050 and Ti. Apparently there will be two models released, the regular 1050 with 2GB graphics memory yet also a 1050 Ti with 4GB memory. According to to an earlier leak from benchlife they claimed the replacement series for the GeForce GTX 950 will be the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with 2GB, this one would be based on a 640 shader processor en-counting GP107-300 Pascal-GPU. The second SKU would be the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, based on a GP107-400 Pascal based GPU with 768 shader processors. The cards will be priced at 119 and 139 USD respectively.
The benchmarks however surfaced over at Chiphell and next towards 3DMark 11 results a GPU-Z screenshot was posted. The manufacturer ID is Colorful and the card indeed has 4 GB GDDR5 memory / 128-bit. It scores 10054 points in the P score and 3867 points in the X mode, again this is 3DMark 11. That would be above the GeForce GTX 960 (X3302).
Now if we add that number to our own charts, this would be the generic picture (mind you that the results could be fake, hence a grain of salt, common sense and healthy skepticism always is recommended):
| |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTX 1060 6 GB | GTX 1060 3 GB | GTX 1050 Ti | GTX 1050 | GTX 950 | |
GPU | GP106-400 | GP106-300 | GP107-400 | GP107-300 | GM206-250/251 |
Shader processors | 1280 | 1152 | 768 | 640 | 768 |
TMU's | 80 | 72 | 48 | 40 | 48 |
ROP's | 48 | 48 | 32 | TBA | 32 |
GPU freq | 1,506 MHz | 1,506 MHz | 1,290 MHz | 1,354 MHz | 1,024 MHz |
Boost freq | 1,709 MHz | 1,709 MHz | 1,382 MHz | 1,455 MHz | 1,188 MHz |
Mem freq | 2,002 MHz | 2,002 MHz | 1,752 MHz | TBA | 1,653 MHz |
Mem size | 6 GB GDDR5 | 3 GB GDDR5 | 4 GB GDDR5 | 2 GB GDDR5 | 2 GB GDDR5 |
mem bus | 192-bit | 192-bit | 128-bit | 128-bit | 128-bit |
TDP | 120W | 120W | 75W | 75W | 90W/75W |
The GeForce GTX 1050 would get you 1.9 TFlops of (single precision) performance with 2.2 TFlops for the GTX 1050 Ti model. Both cards would fit in a 75 Watt TDP and thus will not require an external power connector.
First GeForce GTX 980 Ti Pictures hit the web - 05/23/2015 10:09 AM
The first pictures of NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 980 Ti graphics card have been outed yesterday, the Ti model is the upcoming enthusiast class graphics card from Nvidia....
The First GeForce GTX 980 Benchmarks ? - 09/07/2014 08:52 PM
3DMark scores of a GeForce GTX 980 and 980M SLI have surfaced on the web today, the website Videocardz posted them. Before I continue I want to say that there is no validity of the screen-shots whatso...
Valve Launches First Generation Steam Machines - 01/07/2014 10:03 AM
Valve, creators of best-selling game franchises (such as Counter-Strike, Dota 2, Half-Life, Left 4 Dead, Portal, and Team Fortress) and leading technologies (such as Steam and Source), today announced...
NVIDIA quietly adds first GeForce 300 series chip - 11/27/2009 12:11 PM
In a low-key move during Thanksgiving, NVIDIA has added the first graphics chipset to its GeForce 300 series. The GeForce 310 is a direct replacement for the earlier 210 and (andf thus a rename), like...
Senior Member
Posts: 184
Joined: 2016-09-19
So how 1050 Ti was created? Everyone know, that to cut production cost of failures, they sell the same graphic core with locked block where is failure... You can just look for transistor count - 1070 is failed version of 1080, 1080 Ti is failed version of Titan, 1060 3GB is failed version of 1060 6GB, but 1050 Ti? It looks like unlocked version of 1050.... or 1050 if failed version of 1060? Then 1050 Ti is less failure of failure?
Senior Member
Posts: 7440
Joined: 2012-11-10
Seems Nvidia is overshooting their target here... When it was new, the 750 Ti was one of the best GPUs ever made in terms of performance-per-watt. The way I see it, the 1050 Ti should be attempting to replace it as an energy efficient yet capable GPU, but it consumes an extra 15W of power. Sure, it's pretty efficient compared to the 1060, but Pascal isn't some minor bump up from Maxwell. They could have kept most of the specs exactly the same as the 750 Ti and it still would have been a much better GPU.
Member
Posts: 37
Joined: 2016-03-24
Yes, that is how CPU/GPU/Memory production has worked for the past decade or more... What is your point?
Senior Member
Posts: 184
Joined: 2016-09-19
Member
Posts: 37
Joined: 2016-03-24
That's pretty impressive.
It's almost as fast as a 290 which has an average power consumption of 250 Watt according to the Guru3D tests from a while ago.
It's basically delivering same performance with 3 times less power. Pretty neat.