ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
End-user manages to install FidelityFX Super Resolution in GTA V and shares it as mod
While the FidelityFX Super Resolution Open Source version still needs to be published, some games fans can already look at implementing it in their favorite titles to take advantage of it even without an official release. In this case, it was a GTA V fan that managed to install it in that game and made a mod available to everybody to try.
The mod replaces the original GTA V upscaler DLL with a FidelityFX Super Resolution DLL, allowing FSR profiles to be controlled through the upscaling options that were already present in the game menu. The equivalents are as follows:
- 0.5x - Performance Mode
- 0.667x - Balanced Mode
- 0.75x - Quality Mode
- 0.883x - Ultra Quality Mode
The user behind the mod posted a video where he compares the original upscaling vs. the upscaling with FSR, and although the FPS remains the same, the graphic quality when using FSR is much higher than when using the original upscaler of the game. Unfortunately, the video does not compare the performance in native resolution vs. performance with FSR, although users on reddit reported gains of around 25% in balanced mode.
The mod was posted on Github, where you will also find the instructions to install and test it for yourself. We are not responsible for possible damage or loss of data when downloading such files, you assume the risk in doing so.
First End-User SM226x base PCIe NVMe M2 SSD Spotted - 12/29/2017 07:47 PM
It has been a while since we heard from this Silicon Motion NVMe SSD controller series, but the first SM226x PCIe NVMe SSD have been spotted. A company called Taipower just announced the new Mirage ...
DirectX End-User Runtimes (June 2010) out for Grabs - 06/08/2010 01:20 PM
This download provides the very latest June 2010
DirectX End-User Runtimes (February 2010) - 02/06/2010 01:43 PM
Microsoft released DirectX End-User Runtimes release February 2010. This download provides the DirectX end-user multi-languaged redistributable that developers can include with their product. This dis...
DirectX End-User Runtimes with DX11 (August 2009) available - 09/10/2009 08:59 AM
This download provides the DirectX end-user multi-languaged redistributable that developers can include with their product. This distro doesn't just update DX9, but also updates DX10 and DX11. This p...
Download: DirectX End-User Runtimes March 2009 - 03/25/2009 06:13 AM
We have a new March update for DirectX 9 and 10 available for download today. This download provides the DirectX end-user multi-languaged redistributable that developers can include with their product...
ViperAnaf
Senior Member
Posts: 404
Joined: 2010-03-07
Senior Member
Posts: 404
Joined: 2010-03-07
#5926035 Posted on: 07/02/2021 09:05 AM
lol look at the video - it looks like a blurry mess.... The only way its going to "kill" DLSS is if more poor people will convince themselves its actually working...
fsr is gonna kill dlss by being effortlessly implemented into majority of games
lol look at the video - it looks like a blurry mess.... The only way its going to "kill" DLSS is if more poor people will convince themselves its actually working...
haste
Senior Member
Posts: 1666
Joined: 2006-09-30
Senior Member
Posts: 1666
Joined: 2006-09-30
#5926041 Posted on: 07/02/2021 09:18 AM
The biggest disadvantage of FSR is the lack of actually adding any information to the image. It simply "enhances" the information already there, including all possible artifacts, aliasing etc. From marketing point of view, DLSS and FSR may seem comparable, but in fact, they are not. Even UE's temporal reconstruction and most temporal injection techniques add more information to the image than FSR.
The biggest disadvantage of FSR is the lack of actually adding any information to the image. It simply "enhances" the information already there, including all possible artifacts, aliasing etc. From marketing point of view, DLSS and FSR may seem comparable, but in fact, they are not. Even UE's temporal reconstruction and most temporal injection techniques add more information to the image than FSR.
insp1re2600
Senior Member
Posts: 2185
Joined: 2018-01-03
Senior Member
Posts: 2185
Joined: 2018-01-03
#5926044 Posted on: 07/02/2021 09:27 AM
he is using directx11 mode too
lol look at the video - it looks like a blurry mess.... The only way its going to "kill" DLSS is if more poor people will convince themselves its actually working...
he is using directx11 mode too
IceVip
Senior Member
Posts: 846
Joined: 2013-04-08
Senior Member
Posts: 846
Joined: 2013-04-08
#5926055 Posted on: 07/02/2021 10:18 AM
Yeah from what am seeing, it uses some edge detection and applies blur to it, then sharpens the edges it blurs and adds
just a tad bit of contrast to make it look like its better than native. I know, bluring something just to make it sharp again sounds retarded but ey, people think fsr is new too so.
If someone did those three things sequentially in reshade or enb, there's your fsr. I don't really know why it took this much to come this far(which ain't far).
This technique is used when tryina' make a digital camera look like it was shot on film. Absolutely the same technique gives a
really unique character to the image. But it won't even come close to what nvidia did with their thing. I'm still stunned by what DLSS is capable of.
The biggest disadvantage of FSR is the lack of actually adding any information to the image. It simply "enhances" the information already there, including all possible artifacts, aliasing etc. From marketing point of view, DLSS and FSR may seem comparable, but in fact, they are not. Even UE's temporal reconstruction and most temporal injection techniques add more information to the image than FSR.
Yeah from what am seeing, it uses some edge detection and applies blur to it, then sharpens the edges it blurs and adds
just a tad bit of contrast to make it look like its better than native. I know, bluring something just to make it sharp again sounds retarded but ey, people think fsr is new too so.
If someone did those three things sequentially in reshade or enb, there's your fsr. I don't really know why it took this much to come this far(which ain't far).
This technique is used when tryina' make a digital camera look like it was shot on film. Absolutely the same technique gives a
really unique character to the image. But it won't even come close to what nvidia did with their thing. I'm still stunned by what DLSS is capable of.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 4608
Joined: 2020-08-03
fsr is gonna kill dlss by being effortlessly implemented into majority of games