Hyte Revolt 3 chassis review
ASUS Crosshair X670E HERO review
Patriot Viper Venom DDR5 6200 CL40 review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X processor review
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X processor review
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X review
DDR5 Ryzen 7 7700 DDR5 memory scaling review
Seasonic Arch Q503 chassis + Connect PSU review
GeForce RTX 4080/4090 announcements (preview)
Download: Cinebench R15 Extreme Edition - Unofficial MOD for HEDT platforms
CineBench15 has been around for years. However, Maxon never updated it to cope with many-core processors. The 16-core and even 32-core processors these days can finish up the benchmark in merely seconds. This modded version offers a fourfold increase in workload.
Download: 3DMark for Windows (v2.8.6427) now available - 02/04/2019 09:15 PM
UL released an update for 3DMark for Windows. This update adds the NVIDIA DLSS feature test for comparing DLSS performance and image quality. ...
Download: Radeon Software Adrenalin 2019 Edition 19.2.1 Drivers - 02/04/2019 08:44 PM
The Radeon Technologies Group has released Radeon Software Adrenalin 2019 Edition 19.2.1. This release supports the upcoming launches for Apex Legends and The Division 2 Private Beta. This release al...
Download: Nvidia GeForce 418.81 WHQL - 02/04/2019 04:20 PM
Nvidia just released GeForce 418.81 WHQL drivers for you to download. It supports all the latest RTX cards as well as being optimized for the latest 3DMark Port Royal benchmark, which has just add...
Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) v18.0.0.8 - 02/02/2019 10:56 AM
Download Display Driver Uninstaller DDU, which has been updated to revision v18.0.0.8. This application is a driver removal utility that can help you completely uninstall AMD/NVIDIA graphics card dri...
Download: AfterBurner 4.6.0 Beta 12 (Build 14315) - 01/28/2019 11:19 AM
We have updated to a new public beta of AfterBurner. The new beta fixes a V/F curve rendering issue with AMD GPUs and adds support for several Turing GPUs as well as a number of other changes. Down...
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 19881
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 19881
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5634682 Posted on: 02/02/2019 11:16 PM
Ok, one old interesting flaship cpu test, 980x/990x
Ok, one old interesting flaship cpu test, 980x/990x
fellix
Senior Member
Posts: 212
Joined: 2005-08-31
Senior Member
Posts: 212
Joined: 2005-08-31
#5634813 Posted on: 02/03/2019 01:08 PM
The result is exactly a quarter of the score I get from the official version of the benchmark. This mod is indeed more suitable for the top-end HEDT builds, as pointed by the author.
So I played with the files of the benchmark and I force it to render X4 Times the resolution!
The result is exactly a quarter of the score I get from the official version of the benchmark. This mod is indeed more suitable for the top-end HEDT builds, as pointed by the author.
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 8325
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 8325
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5634910 Posted on: 02/03/2019 08:09 PM
Question: If it's only exactly 4 times the resolution, and, if like the above suggests that they will be exactly 1/4th the score due to it (within margin), how does this help test HEDT programs? The issue stated is that with such high end CPUs, it's done too fast, but the score will reflect that, if it's only 1/4th the score that it'll show now and take 4 times longer due to the 4 times resolution, it won't change the fluctuation in score, simply the fluctuation in score will be 1/4th what it was, correct?
Example: If the 2990WX's score fluctuates between 5050 and 5150 (which is what i've seen, non-overclock), then this "extreme" will make the 2990WX fluctuate between 1262 and 1287, which is the same fluctuation, even if it simply is "smaller" number between the two.
So is that the purpose of this? to shorten the number difference between them but not the percentage difference?
Question: If it's only exactly 4 times the resolution, and, if like the above suggests that they will be exactly 1/4th the score due to it (within margin), how does this help test HEDT programs? The issue stated is that with such high end CPUs, it's done too fast, but the score will reflect that, if it's only 1/4th the score that it'll show now and take 4 times longer due to the 4 times resolution, it won't change the fluctuation in score, simply the fluctuation in score will be 1/4th what it was, correct?
Example: If the 2990WX's score fluctuates between 5050 and 5150 (which is what i've seen, non-overclock), then this "extreme" will make the 2990WX fluctuate between 1262 and 1287, which is the same fluctuation, even if it simply is "smaller" number between the two.
So is that the purpose of this? to shorten the number difference between them but not the percentage difference?
HWgeek
Senior Member
Posts: 441
Joined: 2005-04-04
Senior Member
Posts: 441
Joined: 2005-04-04
#5634928 Posted on: 02/03/2019 08:59 PM
Another reason: For 2990WX and similar CPU's it's very easy to run CB R15 while OCed hard since the stress is only for few Seconds, but now if the Render times is over 3 times then the max OC could be lower since the system will crush in the middle of the test, so obtaining same relative scores with the stock R15 will be harder.
Also soon we could get 48C~64C Threadripper, and for them CB R15 will be too easy, don't know why CINEBENCH not being updated to stress those high end CPU's.
For example: Quad Xeon Platinum 8180 :jumps around 9600~11500 points
Moreover, as I mentioned Mobile CPU's bench, new 4C/6C can finish the render withing the Turbo duration and without saturating the Cooling system, so for accurate score many Reviewers are doing multiple CB R15 runs to show the score fluctuation after the cooling is over saturated and the CPU start to thermal throttle, With this Extreme Mod you will get more real performance numbers since if the cooling is bad it will start to thermal throttle before finishing the render, For example I compared my Xiaomi Notebook Pro with i5 8250U (Max Turbo 3.4Ghz) vs Lenovo Yoga 730 with i5 8265U (Max Turbo 3.9Ghz) and with unlocked TDP I can get 182 points in CB Extreme while the Lenovo cannot get over 150 (cos Thermal throttle).
Another reason: For 2990WX and similar CPU's it's very easy to run CB R15 while OCed hard since the stress is only for few Seconds, but now if the Render times is over 3 times then the max OC could be lower since the system will crush in the middle of the test, so obtaining same relative scores with the stock R15 will be harder.
Also soon we could get 48C~64C Threadripper, and for them CB R15 will be too easy, don't know why CINEBENCH not being updated to stress those high end CPU's.
For example: Quad Xeon Platinum 8180 :jumps around 9600~11500 points
Moreover, as I mentioned Mobile CPU's bench, new 4C/6C can finish the render withing the Turbo duration and without saturating the Cooling system, so for accurate score many Reviewers are doing multiple CB R15 runs to show the score fluctuation after the cooling is over saturated and the CPU start to thermal throttle, With this Extreme Mod you will get more real performance numbers since if the cooling is bad it will start to thermal throttle before finishing the render, For example I compared my Xiaomi Notebook Pro with i5 8250U (Max Turbo 3.4Ghz) vs Lenovo Yoga 730 with i5 8265U (Max Turbo 3.9Ghz) and with unlocked TDP I can get 182 points in CB Extreme while the Lenovo cannot get over 150 (cos Thermal throttle).
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
2700X - 464 points while regular stuff runs in background (includes video playback, steam, Firefox, ...).