Guru3D Thermal Paste Roundup 2019
Back-to-school Microsoft Office 2016 $18 Win 10 Pro $12
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan 1TB SSD Review
Corsair K57 RGB Wireless keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X review
PowerColor 5700 RED DEVIL review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke review
ASUS Radeon RX 5700 XT ROG STRIX review
ViewSonic Elite XG240R Monitor Review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
Dell Working on 21:9 Cinema Display with 3440x1440 Resolution
Dell will release a Cinema Display with 3440x1440 Resolution in a 21:9 ultra-wide aspect-ratio. The guys over at Expreview have uncovered Dell's plans for a 34-inch display. The new U3415W from Dell offers a native resolution of 3440 x 1440 it's still 40 percent lower pixel count than Ultra HD.
The U3415W reportedly features an IPS LCD panel made by LG. The display should offer a decent middle-ground between currently $400-ish 27-inch WQHD monitors, and four-figure >30-inch Ultra-HD ones taking shape. Via TPU and Expreview.
kanej2007
Senior Member
Posts: 8364
Joined: 2007-08-07
Senior Member
Posts: 8364
Joined: 2007-08-07
#4717512 Posted on: 12/05/2013 09:49 AM
Interesting. I hope it's an IPS panel. Wish there were more specifications with regards to brightness, panel type and response time...
Interesting. I hope it's an IPS panel. Wish there were more specifications with regards to brightness, panel type and response time...
WhiteLightning
Moderator
Posts: 27857
Joined: 2007-09-19
Moderator
Posts: 27857
Joined: 2007-09-19
#4717520 Posted on: 12/05/2013 10:09 AM
While the idea is nothing but awesomeness i doubt watching movies and playing games will be a problem due to the ratio not being supported.
While the idea is nothing but awesomeness i doubt watching movies and playing games will be a problem due to the ratio not being supported.
Devastater6194
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2013-08-17
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 2013-08-17
#4717568 Posted on: 12/05/2013 11:51 AM
So much want. Any news on a release date? Was just about to jump on a Asus PB298Q, now I think I'll wait.
So much want. Any news on a release date? Was just about to jump on a Asus PB298Q, now I think I'll wait.
muddymind
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 2008-04-14
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 2008-04-14
#4717574 Posted on: 12/05/2013 12:07 PM
I'll wait for the rest of the specs to decide if this is going to be my next monitor...
I'll wait for the rest of the specs to decide if this is going to be my next monitor...
kanej2007
Senior Member
Posts: 8364
Joined: 2007-08-07
Senior Member
Posts: 8364
Joined: 2007-08-07
#4717598 Posted on: 12/05/2013 01:04 PM
We can only pray titles we want most support custom resolution!
While the idea is nothing but awesomeness i doubt watching movies and playing games will be a problem due to the ratio not being supported.
We can only pray titles we want most support custom resolution!
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 3001
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 3001
Joined: 2008-09-07
#4717601 Posted on: 12/05/2013 01:07 PM
I'm officially moist.
I'm officially moist.
Xendance
Senior Member
Posts: 5548
Joined: 2005-07-19
Senior Member
Posts: 5548
Joined: 2005-07-19
#4717602 Posted on: 12/05/2013 01:13 PM
That's the problem with multi-display setups in general too. The advantage this has is that it doesn't have bezels
While the idea is nothing but awesomeness i doubt watching movies and playing games will be a problem due to the ratio not being supported.
That's the problem with multi-display setups in general too. The advantage this has is that it doesn't have bezels
huilun02
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2013-10-29
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2013-10-29
#4717611 Posted on: 12/05/2013 01:22 PM
Looks made for watching movies without letterboxing, and also work applications.
Assuming games are quick to support this resolution (which is not hard to code at all), it would be a nice alternative to multi-monitor gaming.
At 4,953,600 pixels, is a bit more than double 1080p (4,147,200 pixels), is less demanding than any triple monitor setup and no annoying bezels.
Looks made for watching movies without letterboxing, and also work applications.
Assuming games are quick to support this resolution (which is not hard to code at all), it would be a nice alternative to multi-monitor gaming.
At 4,953,600 pixels, is a bit more than double 1080p (4,147,200 pixels), is less demanding than any triple monitor setup and no annoying bezels.
Nuwidol
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2012-06-19
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: 2012-06-19
#4717629 Posted on: 12/05/2013 01:38 PM
This is excellent news. Almost exactly what I've been hoping for. I would actually rather a 3200x1800 panel in something like a 32" but this is still great news.
For those of you who are interested in this & coming from a 30" 16x10 panel (like me) here are the differences
This is excellent news. Almost exactly what I've been hoping for. I would actually rather a 3200x1800 panel in something like a 32" but this is still great news.
For those of you who are interested in this & coming from a 30" 16x10 panel (like me) here are the differences
vazup
Senior Member
Posts: 288
Joined: 2013-09-05
Senior Member
Posts: 288
Joined: 2013-09-05
#4717697 Posted on: 12/05/2013 03:12 PM
Looks made for watching movies without letterboxing, and also work applications.
Assuming games are quick to support this resolution (which is not hard to code at all), it would be a nice alternative to multi-monitor gaming.
At 4,953,600 pixels, is a bit more than double 1080p (4,147,200 pixels), is less demanding than any triple monitor setup and no annoying bezels.
Almost all games I play with my 21:9 is working correctly. Heck even old games like Half Life 2 and Doom 3 supports my 21:9 monitor.
Looks made for watching movies without letterboxing, and also work applications.
Assuming games are quick to support this resolution (which is not hard to code at all), it would be a nice alternative to multi-monitor gaming.
At 4,953,600 pixels, is a bit more than double 1080p (4,147,200 pixels), is less demanding than any triple monitor setup and no annoying bezels.
Almost all games I play with my 21:9 is working correctly. Heck even old games like Half Life 2 and Doom 3 supports my 21:9 monitor.
theimported1
Senior Member
Posts: 516
Joined: 2010-05-21
Senior Member
Posts: 516
Joined: 2010-05-21
#4717911 Posted on: 12/05/2013 07:08 PM
Any idea on expected release date and cost?
One thing about these higher res panels is lack of 120Hz.
I almost bought the dell 2560x1080 monitor on sale on newegg right now. The 1080p resolution was a making me question it.
This is perfect.
The only reason for me to possibly own a 1080p panel at this time is refresh rate.
I don't think I could go back to 1080p.
Any idea on expected release date and cost?
One thing about these higher res panels is lack of 120Hz.
I almost bought the dell 2560x1080 monitor on sale on newegg right now. The 1080p resolution was a making me question it.
This is perfect.
The only reason for me to possibly own a 1080p panel at this time is refresh rate.
I don't think I could go back to 1080p.
Taint3dBulge
Senior Member
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2008-10-31
Senior Member
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2008-10-31
#4718044 Posted on: 12/05/2013 09:12 PM
ARE YOU KIDDING ME.. Iv always wanted the ultra wide.. Now after I ordered my qnix 1440p, this comes to light.. bah.. I cant quite cancel my order on the monitor i ordered.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME.. Iv always wanted the ultra wide.. Now after I ordered my qnix 1440p, this comes to light.. bah.. I cant quite cancel my order on the monitor i ordered.
phill1978
Senior Member
Posts: 715
Joined: 2009-10-11
Senior Member
Posts: 715
Joined: 2009-10-11
#4718075 Posted on: 12/05/2013 09:48 PM
This is perfect.
34" should make it about the same height as a 26.5" right? the 29" was the same as a 23"
Also Quad HD for the sake of Quad HD isnt massivley appealing, it will require a crap ton of hardware at 4k to get a minimum 50fps to stop noticeble frame drops and it ultimatley means the overal graphical clarity is raised but the in game fidelity is going to be set back about 5 - 7 years .. consistently
This inbetween resolution gives you above 1440p crispness and a wider aspect to enjoy rather than a 40" 16:9 QHD TV plonked too close to your eyes
I hope the prices arent too insane i can see many people wanting this sweet spot and it even becoming the new standards for PC resolution.
This is perfect.
34" should make it about the same height as a 26.5" right? the 29" was the same as a 23"
Also Quad HD for the sake of Quad HD isnt massivley appealing, it will require a crap ton of hardware at 4k to get a minimum 50fps to stop noticeble frame drops and it ultimatley means the overal graphical clarity is raised but the in game fidelity is going to be set back about 5 - 7 years .. consistently
This inbetween resolution gives you above 1440p crispness and a wider aspect to enjoy rather than a 40" 16:9 QHD TV plonked too close to your eyes
I hope the prices arent too insane i can see many people wanting this sweet spot and it even becoming the new standards for PC resolution.
LesserHellspawn
Senior Member
Posts: 628
Joined: 2010-03-27
Senior Member
Posts: 628
Joined: 2010-03-27
#4718087 Posted on: 12/05/2013 10:14 PM
Heh, thank god my purchase would have been in january. Now I'll wait for this puppy for sure.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME.. Iv always wanted the ultra wide.. Now after I ordered my qnix 1440p, this comes to light.. bah.. I cant quite cancel my order on the monitor i ordered.
Heh, thank god my purchase would have been in january. Now I'll wait for this puppy for sure.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 628
Joined: 2010-03-27
Finally ! I want that.