Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Intel Core i5 11400F processor review
Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro SL 3600 MHz 32GB review
ASRock Z590 Extreme review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC review
Corsair K70 RGB TKL keyboard review
Corsair RM650x (2021) power supply review
be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280mm review
Corsair K55 RGB PRO XT keyboard review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - March 2021
Intel Core i9-11900K processor review

New Downloads
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9466
CPU-Z download v1.96
GeForce 466.11 WHQL driver download
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.2 Beta 2
MSI Afterburner 4.6.4 Beta 2 Download
HWiNFO Download v7.02
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.9.350
Quake II RTX Download 1.5.0
GeForce 465.89 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.33


New Forum Topics
Resident Evil Village: Mercenaries - Gameplay Trailer AMD Epyc 7763 CPUs break Cinebench world record, crushes Intel Xeon in performance Acer EI491CRG9 49-inch MiniLED curved display G-SYNC 240Hz true 1ms HDR2000 RTSS and NV V3 frame rate limiter = artifacts, flicker? Is it normal for Zen 2 all-core to max out at 4 GHz? My 3900X in games seems to top out there 4790K+960 SLI Windows XP Retrogaming build [Mod Driver] NimeZ Radeon Software 21.3.1 - Signature Edition HighPoint adds SSD 6204 RAID controller that can hold four NVMe M.2 SSDs Confirmed: GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12GB Gets Spotted in Transit Fine Utilise Power of RadeonPRO Software & SweetFX Part 2




Guru3D.com » News » Asus unveils ROG Chimera laptop with 144Hz Full HD screen

Asus unveils ROG Chimera laptop with 144Hz Full HD screen

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 08/30/2017 05:44 PM | source: | 5 comment(s)
Asus unveils ROG Chimera laptop with 144Hz Full HD screen

Asus just announced their ROG Chimera. A 17.3" gaming laptop with a 144Hz Full HD display and G-Sync. We're not sure yet, but we think this might be an IPS panel due a 7ms reponse time.

Asus -- Chimera is the world’s first gaming laptop with an ultra-responsive 144Hz wide-view display and a 7ms gray-to-gray response time, delivering smooth and seamless visuals never seen before on a laptop. 

Powered by the factory-overclocked Intel Core i7-7820HK processor that reaches speeds of up to 4.3GHz out of the box, it enables gamers to play AAA games at maxed-out settings. Together with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 graphics — that can reach a maximum boost clock of up to 1974MHz — and Windows 10, Chimera is a bit of a powerhouse. Chimera brings together the best of laptop and console gaming: with built-in Xbox Wireless, gamers can effortlessly connect their favorite Xboxaccessories to the PC without the need for multiple adapters, and without having to swap controllers when switching between console and PC.

“Gamers have different needs, and this is what Join the Republic is all about: offering the best solution to every gamer, regardless of their gaming preferences,” said Global Marketing Director of Republic of Gamers, Derek Yu. “We’re all very excited to bring this incredible lineup of ROG gaming gear to IFA this year.”

Price and release date for the ROG Chimera are still forthcoming, as well as some more photos (the one below is the only one released).



Asus unveils ROG Chimera laptop with 144Hz Full HD screen




« AMD to Release NVMe RAID Support for X399 September 25th · Asus unveils ROG Chimera laptop with 144Hz Full HD screen · Flashing Radeon Vega 64 BIOS into Vega 56 Does Increase performance »

Related Stories

ASUS Unveils Eight ROG products, Avalon prototype and Rampage V Edition 10 X99 - 05/30/2016 01:52 PM
ASUS Republic of Gamers (ROG) today hosted the Join the Republic press event at Computex 2016, marking its first full decade of premium gaming innovation and market leadership — and unveilin...

ASUS Unveils First TUF Series Motherboard, Sabertooth 55i - 10/02/2009 10:13 AM
ASUS, the leader in innovative motherboard solutions, today unveiled the first motherboard in its newly-developed "TUF" (The Ultimate Force) Series, the SABERTOOTH 55i. The TUF Series is spe...

Asus unveils dual HD3850 graphics card - 04/05/2008 02:46 PM
Catering to users who want to enjoy outstanding graphical performance, Asus today unveiled the world's first on-board dual HD3850 graphics card with the Asus EAH3850X2/HTDI/1G. Equipped with two HD385...


Robbo9999
Senior Member



Posts: 1528
Joined: 2012-10-07

#5467889 Posted on: 08/30/2017 06:14 PM
I don't get it, 144Hz combined with 7ms response time, I don't really see the point of that - it'll be blurry, and the whole point of 144Hz is that you see crisp & clear clarity in motion, makes no sense. I think they should have just stuck to a TN screen that has a 1ms response time for their 144Hz - much better!

MainFrame Alpha
Senior Member



Posts: 139
Joined: 2016-05-17

#5467901 Posted on: 08/30/2017 06:52 PM
I don't get it, 144Hz combined with 7ms response time, I don't really see the point of that - it'll be blurry, and the whole point of 144Hz is that you see crisp & clear clarity in motion, makes no sense. I think they should have just stuck to a TN screen that has a 1ms response time for their 144Hz - much better!

as Hilbert stated "we are not sure yet" about the 7ms response.. still it would be a disappointment if it's true.
by the way did anyone notice the GL503 on ASUS international page, it's there specs and support and all, but i do not recall an announcement about it, or maybe i missed that one.

FeDaYin
Member



Posts: 72
Joined: 2006-07-20

#5467954 Posted on: 08/30/2017 10:21 PM
I don't get it, 144Hz combined with 7ms response time, I don't really see the point of that - it'll be blurry, and the whole point of 144Hz is that you see crisp & clear clarity in motion, makes no sense. I think they should have just stuck to a TN screen that has a 1ms response time for their 144Hz - much better!
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/acer_xb270hu.htm#detailed_response
With high refresh rates it it important that the response times can keep up with the demands of the frame rate. At 60Hz a new frame is sent to the screen every 16.6ms, at 120Hz every 8.33ms, and at 144Hz every 6.94ms. The response times need to be at least as fast as this to keep up, and thankfully they are on this screen.
So 7ms is enough for 144hz, if it's lower/higher, you get ghosting and other artifacts.

RavenMaster
Senior Member



Posts: 1234
Joined: 2009-08-19

#5467971 Posted on: 08/30/2017 11:40 PM
Fat ugly laptop with 7ms response time that can't be upgraded. It will cost twice as much as a desktop with the same specs and be just as non-portable due to its hefty size and weight. It's like they just up and decided to make a laptop that is completely opposite to their max-q zephyrus. What a pointless escapade.

Robbo9999
Senior Member



Posts: 1528
Joined: 2012-10-07

#5468037 Posted on: 08/31/2017 07:14 AM
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/acer_xb270hu.htm#detailed_response
So 7ms is enough for 144hz, if it's lower/higher, you get ghosting and other artifacts.
Ah, that's better then. However, 7ms is just over the 6.94ms limit though for 144fps, so I think it would still probably benefit from having a faster response time than 7ms. Also, it means that there's not any room to further overclock the screen if you wanted to, because the screen's response time is already right at the limits for 144fps. Not that many people really want more than 144Hz, but there are benefits to be had above 144Hz if you're willing to go there - I've got a 144Hz monitor & it overclocks to 180Hz - I noticed a competetive difference in Titanfall 2 at 180fps vs 144fps - in fast panning close combat situations - difference can also been seen on the Blur Busters UFO Test website page. (Possible to 'hack' Titanfall 2 to display more than the 144fps limit the game normally imposes - apply V-sync in game menus of actual game, then disable V-sync in NVidia Control Panel)

Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021