Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra review
Corsair 5000D PC Chassis Review
NZXT Kraken X63 RGB Review
ASUS Radeon RX 6900 XT STRIX OC LC Review
TerraMaster F5-221 NAS Review
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 NITRO+ review
Corsair HS70 Bluetooth Headset Review
MSI MEG X570 Unify review
Scythe Ninja 5 air cooler review

New Downloads
3DMark Download v2.16.7117 + Time Spy
Prime95 download version 30.4 build 6
Crystal DiskMark 8.0.1 Download
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v3.37.140
ReShade download v4.9.1
GeForce 461.09 WHQL driver download
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9126
HWiNFO Download v6.41–4345 Beta
MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Beta 4 Download
BaseMark GPU Benchmark v1.2.3 download


New Forum Topics
Radeon GPUs and HDR capabilities Gods of Mars Movie Come Alive with NVIDIA RTX Real-Time Rendering NVIDIA and AMD Graphics card shortages to last thoughout H1 2021 Looking for a Guru to view BSOD Dump files. ASRock Announces the Radeon RX 6900 XT Phantom Gaming D 16G OC Graphics Card CD Projekt apologizes for the release of Cyberpunk 2077 and shows 2021 roadmap Failed/Bad Asrock Phantom Radeon 6800? RX Vega Owners Thread, Tests, Mods, BIOS & Tweaks ! (cont.) Windows power plan settings explorer utility The AMD Ryzen All In One Tread /Overclocking/Memory Speeds & Timings/Tweaking/Cooling Part 2




Guru3D.com » News » AMDs chiplet design allows them to reduce cost of the Ryzen 9 3950X by half

AMDs chiplet design allows them to reduce cost of the Ryzen 9 3950X by half

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 02/25/2020 08:45 AM | source: mydrivers.com | 17 comment(s)
AMDs chiplet design allows them to reduce cost of the Ryzen 9 3950X by half

Much is said and spoken about the Chiplet design from AMD. It works out well for them, really well. But the main reason of using chiplets was dropping expensive monolithic processor die designs, in favor of more economical cores to fabricate. But nobody really knew how much of a benefit that was in terms of money.

AMD revealed that if a monolithic design was used (as Intel uses), a 16-core processor would cost more than double what it currently costs. We mentioned this many times, but if you fabricate big huge die's then chances that on a wafer the yields are bad, is bigger. If you design lots of smaller processors dies on a wafer, the risk of a damaged die is far smaller, and thus far more economical to fabricate as you end up with more working CPU dies (better yields). Of course chipset design have challenges of their own, but AMD isn't rather bothered by it by designing an ultra fast IO chip.

So for a 16-core model you only have to add an additional core die and IO, which is much smaller, cheaper to achieve and this economic. As the new slides indicate, it turns out that it has reduced cost by half. Thanks to this new design, you have the possibility of only marking the price at US $750 to get the Ryzen 9 3950X with 16 cores and 32 threads, while it would surely have cost more somewhere north of USD 1250 perhaps USD 1500, if a monolithic design had been used.

 



AMDs chiplet design allows them to reduce cost of the Ryzen 9 3950X by half AMDs chiplet design allows them to reduce cost of the Ryzen 9 3950X by half




« SilentiumPC adds Signum SG1V Evo TG ARGB chassis · AMDs chiplet design allows them to reduce cost of the Ryzen 9 3950X by half · AMD Big Navi Spotted? - Updated, the twitter photo is a confirmed fake »

4 pages 1 2 3 4


Turanis
Senior Member



Posts: 1727
Joined: 2014-08-15

#5763242 Posted on: 02/25/2020 11:43 AM
Lets not forget what these ...noobs says:
At its Xeon CPU launch event (2017), Intel accused AMD’s Epyc chips as being an “inconsistent” and “repurposed desktop product” with “glued-together” dies.


And,AMD SVP Scott Aylor addressed the issue head on. He noted that while “there’s a theory out there that EPYC is just 4 desktop processors glued together“.
Once you look at the processor as a whole, it should become clear that “this is not a glued together desktop processor“.
Aylor also noted that the company could have built a monolithic part but it would involve “trade-offs that would performance down because it would too large and too difficult to manufacture“.


mbk1969
Senior Member



Posts: 10278
Joined: 2013-01-17

#5763244 Posted on: 02/25/2020 11:51 AM
Good for them (and for customers).

And now when the guy behind that design has moved to Intel (as I take it) we will look at Intel`s future designs...

H83
Senior Member



Posts: 3337
Joined: 2009-09-08

#5763256 Posted on: 02/25/2020 12:36 PM
For me the chiplet design is the real advantage Ryzen has over Intel parts right now. The ability to put more cores at a cheaper price gives them an unsurpassable advantage over the competition. The problem is that sooner or later Intel is going to do the same and then AMD will lose their lead...

theoneofgod
Senior Member



Posts: 4539
Joined: 2014-01-17

#5763280 Posted on: 02/25/2020 01:38 PM
For me the chiplet design is the real advantage Ryzen has over Intel parts right now. The ability to put more cores at a cheaper price gives them an unsurpassable advantage over the competition. The problem is that sooner or later Intel is going to do the same and then AMD will lose their lead...


And that my friend is called competition. That's what we've been asking for, for a long time.

EspHack
Senior Member



Posts: 2616
Joined: 2010-01-03

#5763348 Posted on: 02/25/2020 04:54 PM
well i hope intel takes at least 2 more years to catch up so AMD can at least have a third of the marketshare by then, if they come back today our long hoped competition is dead, back to business as usual

ryzen might be a no brainer upgrade for us, but big business would rather buy yet more intel servers to compensate instead of going amd, amd needs a lot more time to change that

4 pages 1 2 3 4


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021