Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
Corsair 2000D RGB Airflow Mini-ITX - PC chassis review
ASUS PG27AQDM Review - 240Hz 1440p OLED monitor
MSI MAG X670E Tomahawk WiFi review
AMD Shows First Displays with FreeSync Support
AMD announced a competitive and affordable solution to tackle Nvidia's Gsync, it goes under the name FreeSync also known as Adaptive Sync. AMD right now is demonstrating desktop monitors and no longer laptops supporting the technology. Freesync will make the monitor dynamic as well. G-Sync and FreeSync will get rid of screen tearing and tiny sync stuttering/pulsing.
The protocol FreeSync / Adaptive Sync will be embedded into DisplayPort 1.2a and eDP (embedded Displayport), there is a catch though, manufacturers of monitors are free to decide wether or not to support the technology. At Computex there are supported monitors on display, AMD however will not reveal the manufacturers just yet. The Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) already announced the addition of 'Adaptive-Sync' to its popular DisplayPort 1.2a video interface standard. So you guys know, Nvidia does more or less the same thing, yet it requires a 200 USD module to be embedded into a compatible monitor.
AMD claims that as long as the manufacturer will stick to the Displayport 1.2a standard it will support FreeSYnc/ Adaptive Sync and as such that would be free. We do have some reservations about that statement as the monitor definitely needs to be compatible with the standard, and that requires R&D and the right hardware scaler to back that up. That or AMDs implementation could add additional CPU overhead to do a lot of stuff on the software side of things. We are not sure yet as to how that will pan out.
If you like to learn more about the 'overall' technology, have a peek at our G-Sync article. Both companies use different methodologies, but the outcome is nearly similar. FreeSync / Adaptice Sync monitors will be available in Q4 of this year. The photo is courtesy of Tweakers.net (see source link).
AMD Shows Seattle ARM-based server chip for first time - 05/07/2014 09:02 AM
AMD gave its first public demonstration of Seattle, the company's upcoming ARM-based server processor. The chip is based on the ARM Cortex-A57 core and AMD demonstrated it by giving a web hosting de...
AMD Shows Embedded Product Roadmap - 09/10/2013 09:08 AM
AMD disclosed its roadmap for the fast-growing embedded computing market, as it becomes the first company to offer both ARM and x86 processor solutions for low-power and high-performance embedded comp...
AMD Shows New A-Series Notebook APUs - 12/08/2011 01:42 PM
Yesterday AMD
AMD Showcases its First 28 nm GPU - 09/15/2011 10:15 AM
Mobile or not, AMD has working 28nm core logic at work. On display is AMD's upcoming 28nm next gen notebook discrete, GPU, driving Codemasters
AMD shows off 32-core Bulldozer server - 06/23/2011 10:35 AM
AMD demonstrated a 32-core Bulldozer server at the International Supercomputing Conference (ISC) as the Inq reports: At AMD's ISC stand one could find several 2U and 4U servers built with older Opter...
zzzaac
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: 2014-02-28
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: 2014-02-28
#4833442 Posted on: 06/05/2014 10:08 AM
If I'm not mistaken
Free Sync requires a displayport 1.2a, darn I guess even with free sync, I'll need to buy a new monitor
If I'm not mistaken
Free Sync requires a displayport 1.2a, darn I guess even with free sync, I'll need to buy a new monitor
TheDeeGee
Senior Member
Posts: 8859
Joined: 2010-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 8859
Joined: 2010-08-28
#4833443 Posted on: 06/05/2014 10:08 AM
The FreeSync Off monitor is completely different. They could have used a really crap monitor for that instead...
Bad comparison is bad!
Yep.
I personally wont be bothering with a new monitor untill 2020 or so, since i bought my current EIZO CX240 not long ago.
The FreeSync Off monitor is completely different. They could have used a really crap monitor for that instead...
Bad comparison is bad!
Free Sync requires a displayport 1.2a, darn I guess even with free sync, I'll need to buy a new monitor
Yep.
I personally wont be bothering with a new monitor untill 2020 or so, since i bought my current EIZO CX240 not long ago.
Smikis
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: 2009-02-18
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: 2009-02-18
#4833474 Posted on: 06/05/2014 11:38 AM
it isnt supposed to improve image quality, so it doesnt matter if its super ips or crappy tn monitor, it should do same thing and that is removing screen tearing
it isnt supposed to improve image quality, so it doesnt matter if its super ips or crappy tn monitor, it should do same thing and that is removing screen tearing
Extraordinary
Senior Member
Posts: 19558
Joined: 2010-04-21
Senior Member
Posts: 19558
Joined: 2010-04-21
#4833481 Posted on: 06/05/2014 11:47 AM
The FreeSync Off monitor is completely different. They could have used a really crap monitor for that instead...
Bad comparison is bad!
Should have used a CRT for FreeSync OFF
The FreeSync Off monitor is completely different. They could have used a really crap monitor for that instead...
Bad comparison is bad!
Should have used a CRT for FreeSync OFF
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1843
Joined: 2005-08-12
Now I'd like them to be available this year, supported by both NV and AMD. Also, before buying one or another, I'd rather see some reviews including frame jitter, overhead and end-to-end lag measurements.