AMD Ryzen 5 3600 review
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
Team Group T-Force 4133 MHz 16GB DDR4 review
ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII HERO (Wi-fi) review
MSI MEG X570 Godlike review
Corsair NightSword RGB gaming mouse review
Corsair MP600 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD review
Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER JetStream review
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Gaming X TRIO review
AMD Radeon HD 9000 series might arrive in October
More and rumors are circulating that AMD may introduce its Radeon HD 9000 as early as October. The company is anticipated to skip the 8000-series as it already sells Radeon HD 8000-branded parts to OEMs. The first Radeon HD 9000 family parts are anticipated to be Curacao and Hainan, two 28nm chips based on the GCN 2.0 architecture. The new architecture reportedly has an improved front-end with 4 asynchronous computing engines [ACEs] and 3 geometry engines, as well as a higher number of stream processors.
Since at present AMD sells re-badged Radeon HD 7000 products as Radeon HD 8000-series products to OEMs, it is logical for the company to utilize Radeon HD 9000 sequence for its new line of graphics cards. ATI Technologies’ original Radeon 9000-series products based on code-named R300-family graphics processing units revolutionized the market of graphics cards a decade ago and helped ATI (which now belongs to AMD) to become the producer of market leading graphics solutions.
The Curacao XT graphics processor is expected to feature 2304 stream processors (36 compute units), 144 texture units, 48 render back ends and 384-bit memory controller. The Hainan is projected to have 1792 stream processors (28 compute units), 112 texture units, 32 render back ends and 256-bit memory controller. Both chips will share the same front-end (just-like current-gen Radeon HD 7900 and 7800 do) with 4 asynchronous computing engines [ACEs], 3 geometry engines, command processor, global data share and so on.
AMD Radeon Graphics Presents The Fixer - 06/25/2013 08:41 AM
AMD just spread this video as a pun against NVIDIA, we take no credit here. Sometimes Graphics problems call for graphic solutions. You don't have to get your hands dirty. We know a guy. ...
Possible AMD Radeon 8970 XT Photo - 06/09/2013 09:00 AM
A possible photo and specifications of AMD’s upcoming flagship Radeon HD 8970 graphics card have been leaked one 4Chan. Not the best place for rumors it might be so do take this report with ...
AMD Radeon 8000 specs and GCN 2.0 release Q3 2013 (again) - 05/28/2013 08:03 AM
Apparantly Chiphell thinks they have stumbled into what they think are the specs of AMD's upcoming GCN 2.0 (Radeon 8000 series) GPUs. This is all translated poorly with an online translator but here ...
AMD Radeon HD 7730 Photo's and Benchmarks - 04/30/2013 08:24 AM
AMD is to launch a new entry level SKU based on the Radeon HD 7730, a product to fill the gap between the Radeon HD 7670 and the Radeon HD 7750. Based on the 28nm Cape Verde GPU, this chip reportedly ...
AMD Radeon HD 7990 gets tested - 04/24/2013 05:56 AM
The wait is over as we test and review the Radeon HD 7990, including FCAT frametime measurements. The dual GPU product that you guys learned to know under codename Malta finally is released. AMD it do...
BLEH!
Senior Member
Posts: 5860
Joined: 2010-10-17
Senior Member
Posts: 5860
Joined: 2010-10-17
#4628938 Posted on: 07/31/2013 11:41 AM
Does it seriously?
Will it throttle with boxed cooler like 4770K?
Does it seriously?
TheDeeGee
Senior Member
Posts: 5981
Joined: 2010-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 5981
Joined: 2010-08-28
#4628941 Posted on: 07/31/2013 11:47 AM
People use stock coolers still? Oh my :S
People use stock coolers still? Oh my :S
GanjaStar
Senior Member
Posts: 1150
Joined: 2008-08-20
Senior Member
Posts: 1150
Joined: 2008-08-20
#4628952 Posted on: 07/31/2013 11:59 AM
Since when is 4770K clocked at 3.4?
It says in the article that the difference is that 4770K is clocked at 3.4 and 4771 at 3.5.
4770K is also 3.5, its the 4670K thats 3.4.
Since when is 4770K clocked at 3.4?
It says in the article that the difference is that 4770K is clocked at 3.4 and 4771 at 3.5.
4770K is also 3.5, its the 4670K thats 3.4.
Pill Monster
Senior Member
Posts: 25216
Joined: 2007-08-23
Senior Member
Posts: 25216
Joined: 2007-08-23
#4628958 Posted on: 07/31/2013 12:11 PM
Since when is 4770K clocked at 3.4?
It says in the article that the difference is that 4770K is clocked at 3.4 and 4771 at 3.5.
4770K is also 3.5, its the 4670K thats 3.4.It says the 4770 is 3.4Ghz, not the 4770K. The thread title is wrong it should read 4770K.
Still 100mhz more with 4771 is hardly an upgrade...why didn't Intel at least improve the IGP?
Since when is 4770K clocked at 3.4?
It says in the article that the difference is that 4770K is clocked at 3.4 and 4771 at 3.5.
4770K is also 3.5, its the 4670K thats 3.4.It says the 4770 is 3.4Ghz, not the 4770K. The thread title is wrong it should read 4770K.
Still 100mhz more with 4771 is hardly an upgrade...why didn't Intel at least improve the IGP?
maikai
Senior Member
Posts: 1287
Joined: 2004-07-03
Senior Member
Posts: 1287
Joined: 2004-07-03
#4628977 Posted on: 07/31/2013 12:49 PM
Since when is 4770K clocked at 3.4?
It says in the article that the difference is that 4770K is clocked at 3.4 and 4771 at 3.5.
4770K is also 3.5, its the 4670K thats 3.4.
Core i7-4770K is currently an extra 100 MHz faster out of the box over the non-K version of the CPU. The idea is that the i7-4771 will have the same stock clock speeds as those of the i7-4770K -- 3.5 GHz.
Since when is 4770K clocked at 3.4?
It says in the article that the difference is that 4770K is clocked at 3.4 and 4771 at 3.5.
4770K is also 3.5, its the 4670K thats 3.4.
Core i7-4770K is currently an extra 100 MHz faster out of the box over the non-K version of the CPU. The idea is that the i7-4771 will have the same stock clock speeds as those of the i7-4770K -- 3.5 GHz.
BLEH!
Senior Member
Posts: 5860
Joined: 2010-10-17
Senior Member
Posts: 5860
Joined: 2010-10-17
#4629008 Posted on: 07/31/2013 01:47 PM
It still surprises me Intel can't get a quad core chip with 4 GHz stock speed.
It still surprises me Intel can't get a quad core chip with 4 GHz stock speed.
Solfaur
Senior Member
Posts: 7068
Joined: 2005-08-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7068
Joined: 2005-08-10
#4629048 Posted on: 07/31/2013 02:58 PM
It's not a matter of can, but want. And they don't want to because they don't need to.
It still surprises me Intel can't get a quad core chip with 4 GHz stock speed.
It's not a matter of can, but want. And they don't want to because they don't need to.
xIcarus
Senior Member
Posts: 935
Joined: 2010-08-24
Senior Member
Posts: 935
Joined: 2010-08-24
#4630168 Posted on: 08/01/2013 10:26 PM
I really doubt they can't do that. I pushed my 2600k to 4 ghz without modifying the voltage. sure, sandy bridge is great on overclocking but still.
clock speed is nothing more than a marketing strategy these days, the days that higher clock speed meant higher performance are long gone, and here I'm talking about comparing 2 different architectures. some people will wet themselves when they see that 5 ghz cpu from amd, but the power user will always raise questions like 'how does it actually perform?' 'what's the power consumption?' 'how much heat does it generate?'.
It still surprises me Intel can't get a quad core chip with 4 GHz stock speed.
I really doubt they can't do that. I pushed my 2600k to 4 ghz without modifying the voltage. sure, sandy bridge is great on overclocking but still.
clock speed is nothing more than a marketing strategy these days, the days that higher clock speed meant higher performance are long gone, and here I'm talking about comparing 2 different architectures. some people will wet themselves when they see that 5 ghz cpu from amd, but the power user will always raise questions like 'how does it actually perform?' 'what's the power consumption?' 'how much heat does it generate?'.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 2007-05-27
Will it throttle with boxed cooler like 4770K?