Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review

New Downloads
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.1a Download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.5.2 WHQL download
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4382
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v5.2
GeForce 535.98 WHQL driver download
CPU-Z download v2.06
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.5.1 WHQL download
GeForce 532.03 WHQL driver download
AMD Chipset Drivers Download 5.05.16.529
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.4


New Forum Topics
LG 32GR93U UltraGear Monitor: 4K UHD Gaming 144Hz IPS PSA: 535 system stability concerns. Extreme 4-Way Sli Tuning AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 23.5.2 - Driver Download and Discussion Info Zone - gEngines, Ray Tracing, DLSS, DLAA, TSR, FSR, XeSS, DLDSR etc. Review: Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W power supply Advantage of a commercial NAS vs homebuild one ? MSI AB / RTSS development news thread AMD Driver DLLs Repository and Performance Survey Are these temps safe for long gameplays?




Guru3D.com » News » AMD Radeon HD 9000 series might arrive in October

AMD Radeon HD 9000 series might arrive in October

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/02/2013 04:04 PM | source: | 9 comment(s)
AMD Radeon HD 9000 series might arrive in October

More and rumors are circulating that AMD may introduce its Radeon HD 9000 as early as October. The company is anticipated to skip the 8000-series as it already sells Radeon HD 8000-branded parts to OEMs. The first Radeon HD 9000 family parts are anticipated to be Curacao and Hainan, two 28nm chips based on the GCN 2.0 architecture. The new architecture reportedly has an improved front-end with 4 asynchronous computing engines [ACEs] and 3 geometry engines, as well as a higher number of stream processors.

Since at present AMD sells re-badged Radeon HD 7000 products as Radeon HD 8000-series products to OEMs, it is logical for the company to utilize Radeon HD 9000 sequence for its new line of graphics cards. ATI Technologies’ original Radeon 9000-series products based on code-named R300-family graphics processing units revolutionized the market of graphics cards a decade ago and helped ATI (which now belongs to AMD) to become the producer of market leading graphics solutions.

The Curacao XT graphics processor is expected to feature 2304 stream processors (36 compute units), 144 texture units, 48 render back ends and 384-bit memory controller. The Hainan is projected to have 1792 stream processors (28 compute units), 112 texture units, 32 render back ends and 256-bit memory controller. Both chips will share the same front-end (just-like current-gen Radeon HD 7900 and 7800 do) with 4 asynchronous computing engines [ACEs], 3 geometry engines, command processor, global data share and so on.







« Microsoft to End TechNet next month · AMD Radeon HD 9000 series might arrive in October · NETGEAR Announces R6100 802.11 ac Router »

Related Stories

AMD Radeon Graphics Presents The Fixer - 06/25/2013 08:41 AM
AMD just spread this video as a pun against NVIDIA, we take no credit here. Sometimes Graphics problems call for graphic solutions. You don't have to get your hands dirty. We know a guy.  ...

Possible AMD Radeon 8970 XT Photo - 06/09/2013 09:00 AM
A possible photo and specifications of AMD’s upcoming flagship Radeon HD 8970 graphics card have been leaked one 4Chan. Not the best place for rumors it might be so do take this report with ...

AMD Radeon 8000 specs and GCN 2.0 release Q3 2013 (again) - 05/28/2013 08:03 AM
Apparantly Chiphell thinks they have stumbled into what they think are the specs of AMD's upcoming GCN 2.0 (Radeon 8000 series) GPUs. This is all translated poorly with an online translator but here ...

AMD Radeon HD 7730 Photo's and Benchmarks - 04/30/2013 08:24 AM
AMD is to launch a new entry level SKU based on the Radeon HD 7730, a product to fill the gap between the Radeon HD 7670 and the Radeon HD 7750. Based on the 28nm Cape Verde GPU, this chip reportedly ...

AMD Radeon HD 7990 gets tested - 04/24/2013 05:56 AM
The wait is over as we test and review the Radeon HD 7990, including FCAT frametime measurements. The dual GPU product that you guys learned to know under codename Malta finally is released. AMD it do...


2 pages 1 2


LaDeX
Junior Member



Posts: 16
Joined: 2007-05-27

#4628910 Posted on: 07/31/2013 10:34 AM
Will it throttle with boxed cooler like 4770K?

BLEH!
Senior Member



Posts: 6365
Joined: 2010-10-17

#4628938 Posted on: 07/31/2013 11:41 AM
Will it throttle with boxed cooler like 4770K?


Does it seriously?

TheDeeGee
Senior Member



Posts: 8877
Joined: 2010-08-28

#4628941 Posted on: 07/31/2013 11:47 AM
People use stock coolers still? Oh my :S

GanjaStar
Senior Member



Posts: 1146
Joined: 2008-08-20

#4628952 Posted on: 07/31/2013 11:59 AM
Since when is 4770K clocked at 3.4?

It says in the article that the difference is that 4770K is clocked at 3.4 and 4771 at 3.5.

4770K is also 3.5, its the 4670K thats 3.4.

Pill Monster
Senior Member



Posts: 25214
Joined: 2007-08-23

#4628958 Posted on: 07/31/2013 12:11 PM
Since when is 4770K clocked at 3.4?

It says in the article that the difference is that 4770K is clocked at 3.4 and 4771 at 3.5.

4770K is also 3.5, its the 4670K thats 3.4.It says the 4770 is 3.4Ghz, not the 4770K. The thread title is wrong it should read 4770K.

Still 100mhz more with 4771 is hardly an upgrade...why didn't Intel at least improve the IGP?

2 pages 1 2


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023