EnGenius ECS2512FP. 8-port 2.5G Cloud Switch review
Deepcool CG560 chassis review
Fractal Design Torrent Black RGB TG review
Core i9 12900K DDR4 3600 vs DDR5 5200 performance review
Corsair H150i Elite LCD review
Seasonic Syncro Q704 chassis + Connect PSU review
Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 860W PSU Review
Crucial P5 Plus PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Fractal Design Lumen S28 RGB review (LCS)
WD Red SN700 NVMe SSD review
AMD might move to Samsung for 3nm fabrication due to TSMCs preference for Apple
AMD's current CPUs and GPUs are manufactured by the Taiwan-based semiconductor giant TSMC, however, the company might swing towards Samsung when it comes to producing 3nm chips.
TSMC is increasingly reserving more and more wafers for Apple who opened up a huge sack of cash to gain p[priority. And TSMC is doing exactly that, prioritizing reserving wafers created under future manufacturing methods such as 3nm, the amount of wafers left available for AMD seems to be insufficient in relation to demand. The corporation feels compelled to shift suppliers in order to meet their requirements.
This year TSMC reserved the majority of 5nm capacity to Apple as well
AMD is not the only business that is displeased with TSMC's resource allocation procedures. Qualcomm would be in a similar situation and would have participated in the discussions with Samsung to determine whether they could supply a number of chips greater than what TSMC could deliver, which, as in the case of AMD, was insufficient to meet the demand. of your clients. If Samsung Foundry, the division of the South Korean company in charge of semiconductor manufacturing, has sufficient capacity to meet the demands of AMD and Qualcomm, this transfer of two industry giants could result in a significant increase in the company's revenue as a result of the transfer of two giants. We do not know whether Samsung planned such a large amount of capacity for its 3nm chip factories as a result of not having a large number of clients, but we will undoubtedly learn more about this in the course of next year as more information becomes available. about these possible agreements, which is obviously a great mystery at least publicly.
For the time being, all of this information is based on hearsay though, so we recommend that you treat it with caution. According to official expectations, both AMD and Qualcomm will continue to collaborate with TSMC, however this report makes a lot of sense in light of recent actions by the Taiwanese foundry business to emphasize Apple, which is the company's most important customer.
AMD might detail new RDNA2 graphics card on March 5 - 01/30/2020 10:20 AM
On Financial Analysts Day AMD would share the first details about the new graphics cards that AMD has in the works. According to Mithun Chandrasekhar, the man behind Radeon product management, 'Big N...
AMD might have replaced 14nm Ryzen 5 1600 processors with 12nm 2600 ones - 12/27/2019 10:44 AM
Over the past few days some weird chatter has hit the web, AMD would be shipping 14nm Ryzen 1600 processors, however no based on the Zen+ architecture at 12nm. They have the same IPC as the 2600 but s...
AMD might launch its NAVI 10 next-gen GPU by June - 04/19/2019 08:40 AM
The year 2019 will be hugely important for AMD with ZEN2 and NAVI. A new rumor on the web indicates that AMD will launch its Navi 10 next-gen GPU in the Summer during E3. All eyes are on AMD, to take ...
Rumor: AMD Might Host Threadripper 2000 event in Scuderia Ferrari’s hometown Maranello - 06/30/2018 07:36 PM
A new rumor has surfaced on the web today, AMD would be celebrating it's one-year HEDT Threadripper release, with an event planned for Threadripper 2. This launch event would take place in Maranello,...
MSI and AMD Might Bring CPU + GPU + Mobo Bundle to market - 04/23/2018 02:48 PM
Interesting, MSI and AMD Might offer a Hardware Package slash bundle to the market. The bundle would include a motherboard, processor and graphics card. ...
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 2689
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2689
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5966353 Posted on: 11/19/2021 04:03 PM
Apple's slice of the pie is outrageous. No wonder Apple has had no chip troubles, unlike everybody else. From what I've heard, Apple didn't manage to reserve as much from the production of a microfiber cloth factory, though.
Apple's slice of the pie is outrageous. No wonder Apple has had no chip troubles, unlike everybody else. From what I've heard, Apple didn't manage to reserve as much from the production of a microfiber cloth factory, though.
Prince Valiant
Senior Member
Posts: 742
Joined: 2014-02-23
Senior Member
Posts: 742
Joined: 2014-02-23
#5966355 Posted on: 11/19/2021 04:12 PM
Very much so. The world could do with less Apple e-waste.
Apple's slice of the pie is outrageous. No wonder Apple has had no chip troubles, unlike everybody else. From what I've heard, Apple didn't manage to reserve as much from the production of a microfiber cloth factory, though.
Very much so. The world could do with less Apple e-waste.
tunejunky
Senior Member
Posts: 1758
Joined: 2017-08-18
Senior Member
Posts: 1758
Joined: 2017-08-18
#5966356 Posted on: 11/19/2021 04:15 PM
i seriously doubt this report which goes against the grain of contemporary trade publications.
there is no doubt that Apple is the primary customer. what is in doubt is the alleged wafer allocations.
just like Apple, AMD has paid (through the nose) for wafer allocation/fab time and so has Qualcomm.
the parties who would see their allocations reduced would be 1) Samsung, and 2) Mediatek as both have other options @ node and haven't paid for primacy. Nvidia should be unaffected as they paid for being "late to the gate".
the facts of the matter include that Apple, AMD, and Qualcomm paid to develop 7n, 5n, and 3n and they'll get their share of fab time before others.
if AMD gets additional fab time with Samsung, that's a good thing as it means sales are well beyond projections. but the premise in this article doesn't address this as it treats it as a zero sum game when it's not.
i seriously doubt this report which goes against the grain of contemporary trade publications.
there is no doubt that Apple is the primary customer. what is in doubt is the alleged wafer allocations.
just like Apple, AMD has paid (through the nose) for wafer allocation/fab time and so has Qualcomm.
the parties who would see their allocations reduced would be 1) Samsung, and 2) Mediatek as both have other options @ node and haven't paid for primacy. Nvidia should be unaffected as they paid for being "late to the gate".
the facts of the matter include that Apple, AMD, and Qualcomm paid to develop 7n, 5n, and 3n and they'll get their share of fab time before others.
if AMD gets additional fab time with Samsung, that's a good thing as it means sales are well beyond projections. but the premise in this article doesn't address this as it treats it as a zero sum game when it's not.
tommo1982
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Joined: 2019-07-24
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Joined: 2019-07-24
#5966377 Posted on: 11/19/2021 05:52 PM
It'd be a good opportunity for Intel to make money, if they sold cpacity of their plants.
It'd be a good opportunity for Intel to make money, if they sold cpacity of their plants.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6203
Joined: 2012-11-10
I find it kinda funny how Samsung uses TSMC's process more than Nvidia.