Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
Corsair 2000D RGB Airflow Mini-ITX - PC chassis review
ASUS PG27AQDM Review - 240Hz 1440p OLED monitor
MSI MAG X670E Tomahawk WiFi review
Mountain Makalu Max mouse review
AMD 7341:00 - Radeon RX 570 Successor spotted?
In CompuBench a new AMD Radeon Device ID has been spotted. The new entry could be Navi 14, a product that is set to replace products like the Radeon RX 570. The product is paired with 8 gigabytes of graphics memory and would be a good notch faster in OpenCL.
It has been rumored that Navi 14 is either a Polaris respin or NAVI based replacement. Little is known though. The CompuBench entry carries the device ID AMD 7341: 00 and shows 8 gigabytes of graphics memory and might be an AMD answer to the GTX 1650 and GTX 1660. The card should have 1,536 shader units and clock with up to 1,900 megahertz.
« Microsoft Surface devices clock back to 400 MHz after update · AMD 7341:00 - Radeon RX 570 Successor spotted?
· Updated: Geforce RTX 2080 Ti Super Rumors Surface again »
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 8408
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 8408
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5701712 Posted on: 08/20/2019 12:24 AM
From a price-point standpoint and overall performance standpoint compared to other released graphics cards, the RX 570 was never worthy of the 70 name, more like the 50 range.
Isn't the non-XT 5700 not the actual replacement for the RX570? Similar die size, similar shader unit count, same memory bandwith?
From a price-point standpoint and overall performance standpoint compared to other released graphics cards, the RX 570 was never worthy of the 70 name, more like the 50 range.
sykozis
Senior Member
Posts: 22469
Joined: 2008-07-14
Senior Member
Posts: 22469
Joined: 2008-07-14
#5701729 Posted on: 08/20/2019 02:19 AM
Be that as it may, the RX5700 series should still be replacing the RX570 in AMD's product stack.
From a price-point standpoint and overall performance standpoint compared to other released graphics cards, the RX 570 was never worthy of the 70 name, more like the 50 range.
Be that as it may, the RX5700 series should still be replacing the RX570 in AMD's product stack.
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 8408
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 8408
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5701747 Posted on: 08/20/2019 03:09 AM
You could say that i guess, but realistically it's filling the Vega 56 in AMD's product stack.
From my view point the RX 5000 series are hopefully taking the RX series out of the "designated cheap/low performance" zone and bringing it back to its former glory without the need of randomly named Fury's and Nanos and Vegas and etc. trying to separate themselves from the RX lineup.
The last time the numbered RX series had a $350 level graphics card was 2015
Be that as it may, the RX5700 series should still be replacing the RX570 in AMD's product stack.
You could say that i guess, but realistically it's filling the Vega 56 in AMD's product stack.
From my view point the RX 5000 series are hopefully taking the RX series out of the "designated cheap/low performance" zone and bringing it back to its former glory without the need of randomly named Fury's and Nanos and Vegas and etc. trying to separate themselves from the RX lineup.
The last time the numbered RX series had a $350 level graphics card was 2015
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 15700
Joined: 2018-03-21
Senior Member
Posts: 15700
Joined: 2018-03-21
#5701750 Posted on: 08/20/2019 03:17 AM
idk about that, i've seen some vega56 benches that smash the 5700XT
idk about that, i've seen some vega56 benches that smash the 5700XT
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2018-06-26
Isn't the non-XT 5700 not the actual replacement for the RX570? Similar die size, similar shader unit count, same memory bandwith?