6GHz Core i9-13900KS outperforms the Core i9-13900K by 10%.
Intel is developing the Core i9-13900KS to compete with the finest binned CPUs on the market. The special edition Raptor Lake processor will surge to a breathtaking 6 GHz; but, early benchmarks show that the Core i9-13900KS may not be substantially quicker than the present top Raptor Lake chip, the Core i9-13900K.
The Core i9-13900KS follows the same formula as the Core i9-13900K, with 24 cores and 32 threads. Furthermore, the configuration includes eight P-cores and sixteen E-cores. As a result, the performance boost from the Core i9-13900KS will be completely due to higher clock rates. Through Intel's Thermal Velocity Boost (TVB) technology, the normal Core i9-13900K achieves 5.8 GHz, while the Core i9-13900KS achieves 6 GHz. The additional 200 MHz will put the Core i9-13900KS somewhat ahead of the Core i9-13900K.
Benchleaks discovered three Geekbench 5 submissions for the Core i9-13900K, and we compared the highest result to obtain a notion of the best-case situation. The Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero and an ultra-fast 32GB DDR5-7200 memory kit were also included in the test setup. The Core i9-13900K surpassed the Core i9-13900K by 4.1% in single-core performance, and it outperformed the Core i9-12900KS and Core i9-12900K by 11.4% and 16.6%, respectively. The Core i9-13900KS also outperformed AMD's current Ryzen 7000 flagship, the Ryzen 9 7950X, by 5.8% in single-core performance.
In terms of multi-core performance, the Core i9-13900K outperformed the Core i9-13900K by up to 10.1%, and it outperformed the Core i9-12900KS and Core i9-12900K by 40.4% and 54.5%, respectively. The Ryzen 9 7950X, on the other hand, proved no match for the Core i9-13900KS, with the 6 GHz CPU achieving a 16.6% better multi-core score.
Intel intends to reclaim the crown with the Core i9-13900KS, but word on the street is that AMD is developing up to three Ryzen 7000 3D V-Cache chips for 2023, making it an ideal year for gamers with a plethora of powerful gaming options.
Cores | Caches | Clock Frequencies | GPU | Power usage | |||||||
Processor | p | E | L2 | L3 | Base P | Turbo P | Base E | Turbo E | Model | Base | Turbo |
Core i9-13900K | 8 | 16 | 32MB | 36MB | 3.0GHz | 5.8GHz | 2.2GHz | 4.3GHz | UHD 770 | 125W | 253W |
Core i7-13700K | 8 | 8 | 24MB | 30MB | 3.4GHz | 5.4GHz | 2.5GHz | 4.2GHz | UHD 770 | 125W | 253W |
Core i5-13600K | 6 | 8 | 20MB | 24MB | 3.5GHz | 5.1GHz | 2.6GHz | 3.9GHz | UHD 770 | 125W | 181W |
Senior Member
Posts: 10491
Joined: 2006-02-14
It will be a halo show off product to say "hey we are the first to maintain 6GHZ for couple of seconds...".
This little bugger, going to throttle his life out of him.
Well... you could always cool it using the vacuum of space then use custom BIOS settings to maintain 6GHz. If you're buying a cherry picked halo CPU, you might as well have it installed in space while you're at it. Anything that'll put any pressure on AMD and vice versa is good, even if it's a goofy showoff item like this.
Senior Member
Posts: 6588
Joined: 2004-09-30
Let's see AMD rolling their sleeves out and bring the X3D variants already...
Senior Member
Posts: 2576
Joined: 2011-01-05
Until 7950X3D comes out?!
Senior Member
Posts: 6588
Joined: 2004-09-30
I'll probably skip this gen all together, but yeah.
7950X3D could be the top of the hill easily, it's actually there now along with the 13900K.
Senior Member
Posts: 6588
Joined: 2004-09-30
It will be a halo show off product to say "hey we are the first to maintain 6GHZ for couple of seconds...".
This little bugger, going to throttle his life out of him.