Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1743
GeForce 516.94 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.4
FurMark Download v1.31
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.3222
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.7.1 driver download
GeForce 516.93 WHQL Studio driver download
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.26.110
ReShade download v5.3.0
AIDA64 Download Version 6.75


New Forum Topics
GeForce RTX 4080 and RTX 4070 same consumption as RTX 3080 and RTX 3070 but more performance JPR estimates Intel GPU unit losses at $3.5 billion, suggests selling it Intel has released performance figures for the Arc A750 Vulkan and DirectX 12 APIs DDR5-6000 Memory is the Sweet Spot For AMD Ryzen 7000 Zen 4 CPUs RTX 3000 Series artifacts, black squares that flicker in desktop and 2D mode [3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Release Nemesis 22.6.1 WHQL DriverPack (22.7.1 pending ...) AMD video cards paired with AMD vs Intel? NVIDIA GeForce 516.94 WHQL driver download & Discussion Nvidia reduces revenue prediction due to video card demand. 516.94 - Clean Version




Guru3D.com » News » 28nm the end of Moore's Law?

28nm the end of Moore's Law?

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/25/2014 08:55 AM | source: | 15 comment(s)
28nm the end of Moore's Law?

The 28nm process is actually the last node of Moore's Law according to EE Times. The site argues that we can continue to make smaller transistors and pack more of them into the same size die, but can't continue to reduce the cost with current technology. Therefore, EE Times claims 28nm will be the most cost-efficient process node for many years to come.

Beyond this point, we can continue to make smaller transistors and pack more of them into the same size die, but we cannot continue to reduce the cost. In most cases, in fact, the same SoC will actually have a higher cost!

The famous Moore's Law was presented as an observation by Moore in his 1965 Electronics paper "The future of integrated electronics," in which he said:

The complexity for minimum component costs has increased at a rate of roughly a factor of two per year. Certainly over the short term this rate can be expected to continue, if not to increase. Over the longer term, the rate of increase is a bit more uncertain, although there is no reason to believe it will not remain nearly constant for at least 10 years.

Clearly, Moore's Law is about "The complexity for minimum component costs," and the minimum component cost will be at the 28nm node for many years, as we will detail in the remainder of this blog.

More here



28nm the end of Moore's Law?




« SSD pricing to drop 20-30 percent this year says Transcend · 28nm the end of Moore's Law? · Silicon Power Releases Slim Series SSDs »

3 pages 1 2 3


southamptonfc
Senior Member



Posts: 2248
Joined: 2006-04-10

#4788452 Posted on: 03/25/2014 09:54 AM
Interesting stuff!

I'm used to stories like this followed by a technology breakthrough allowing Moores Law to continue for a few more years but perhaps we reall are approaching a significant point in chip production.

It sounds like one of the main problems is the transistor leakage in current designs preventing mass production of smaller than 28nm wafers, hopefully they can solve these production issues.

BLEH!
Senior Member



Posts: 6284
Joined: 2010-10-17

#4788554 Posted on: 03/25/2014 03:06 PM
We really need to be looking at other materials. They do exist.

schmidtbag
Senior Member



Posts: 6664
Joined: 2012-11-10

#4788608 Posted on: 03/25/2014 05:09 PM
We really need to be looking at other materials. They do exist.


True, but in the meantime, companies like AMD/TSMC can finally catch up.

On the other hand, intel obviously has the money to make a factory to go the next size smaller, the problem is will they make a product that makes such a die shrink worth doing? If you already own an i7 or an overclocked i5, it's getting increasingly harder to justify an upgrade.

nicugoalkeper
Senior Member



Posts: 907
Joined: 2006-04-13

#4788646 Posted on: 03/25/2014 06:20 PM
True, but in the meantime, companies like AMD/TSMC can finally catch up.
...

Only if Intel stops. :banana:

FerCamâ„¢
Senior Member



Posts: 241
Joined: 2005-10-08

#4788652 Posted on: 03/25/2014 06:28 PM
This is really interesting, it's when things like this happen that revolutionary technologies appear. In worst case scenario we will start to see true process optimisation.

3 pages 1 2 3


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022