Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
Corsair 2000D RGB Airflow Mini-ITX - PC chassis review
ASUS PG27AQDM Review - 240Hz 1440p OLED monitor
MSI MAG X670E Tomahawk WiFi review
Ryzen 5000 - Zen 3 lineup Cinebench R20 scores pop up in database
Well, that was fast. Benchmark results of the complete announced Zen 3 lineup in Cinebench R20 have surfaced on the German website CPU-monkey.
The site also contains figures for many other processors, which makes comparison possible. Below is an overview of the ten best-scoring CPUs in R20 Single-Core, based on the data from CPU-monkey.
| CPU | Cores / threads | Base / boost (GHz) | R20 Single-Core | R20 Multi-Core |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | 16/32 | 3.40 / 4.90 | 641 | 10,360 |
| AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | 12/24 | 3.70 / 4.80 | 629 | 8,168 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | 8/16 | 3.80 / 4.70 | 618 | 5,724 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 6/12 | 3.70 / 4.60 | 604 | 4,312 |
| Intel Core i7-1185G7 | 4/8 | 3.00 / 4.80 | 598 | 2,477 |
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 | 4/8 | 2.80 / 4.70 | 561 | 2,234 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | 8/16 | 4.20 / 4.70 | 539 | 5,122 |
| AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | 12/24 | 4.10 / 4.70 | 539 | 7,244 |
| Intel Core i9-10900KF | 10/20 | 3.70 / 5.30 | 539 | 6,399 |
| Intel Core i9-10900K | 10/20 | 3.70 / 5.30 | 539 | 6,399 |
The results certainly are looking good, positioning Zen 3 at the top. A 5950X is about 7% higher than that of the Tiger Lake CPU, on a desktop level the 5950X scores about 19% better than the i9 10900K (F). AMD has shown some R20 benchmarks in its Zen 3 reveal, these scores seem to match closely to the website's results. It is not known what the source of this is or how these have been tested.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 22289
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 22289
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5841717 Posted on: 10/12/2020 12:11 PM
Said in a slide somewhere that "Prices are subject to change" meaning if Intel starts to threaten or if they feel there is too much negative opinions regarding the price, they could always do a a 50$ cut.
Which basically means its more expensive only becouse there is no competition.
Said in a slide somewhere that "Prices are subject to change" meaning if Intel starts to threaten or if they feel there is too much negative opinions regarding the price, they could always do a a 50$ cut.
Which basically means its more expensive only becouse there is no competition.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5841719 Posted on: 10/12/2020 12:13 PM
You can be confident that it's not gonna happen in many years.
Intel have the performance crown for many years without competition, I doubt that Intel it's gonna sink without doing anything, and they have the money and the resources.
My fear it's that this is a one day flower. I hope that AMD can fight the crown for many years.
Well, intel ended innovation with Sandy bridge. All they did since then was tiny base/boost clock each generation and IMC capable to have faster memories.
(And added AVX2 w/ Haswell.)
Would Sandy been equipped wit equal IMC and memories as current chips clocking around 4.5GHz, it would be about equal everywhere except AVX2.
Way intel got money came from clocking down environment. Want OC? Pay for OC CPU and OC chipset. Otherwise enjoy that 100~300MHz bump from next generation and 133~267MHz higher memory clock.
I doubt AMD is going that way. They may ask more for their chips each generation. But it will come with higher performance and power efficiency.
When AM5 comes, early adopters will be paying extra for DDR5, but will get benefits of 8C/16T CPUs capable to match current 12C/24T. (And run circles around them in games.)
You can be confident that it's not gonna happen in many years.
Intel have the performance crown for many years without competition, I doubt that Intel it's gonna sink without doing anything, and they have the money and the resources.
My fear it's that this is a one day flower. I hope that AMD can fight the crown for many years.
Well, intel ended innovation with Sandy bridge. All they did since then was tiny base/boost clock each generation and IMC capable to have faster memories.
(And added AVX2 w/ Haswell.)
Would Sandy been equipped wit equal IMC and memories as current chips clocking around 4.5GHz, it would be about equal everywhere except AVX2.
Way intel got money came from clocking down environment. Want OC? Pay for OC CPU and OC chipset. Otherwise enjoy that 100~300MHz bump from next generation and 133~267MHz higher memory clock.
I doubt AMD is going that way. They may ask more for their chips each generation. But it will come with higher performance and power efficiency.
When AM5 comes, early adopters will be paying extra for DDR5, but will get benefits of 8C/16T CPUs capable to match current 12C/24T. (And run circles around them in games.)
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 14604
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 14604
Joined: 2014-07-21
#5841730 Posted on: 10/12/2020 12:31 PM
Said in a slide somewhere that "Prices are subject to change" meaning if Intel starts to threaten or if they feel there is too much negative opinions regarding the price, they could always do a a 50$ cut.
Which basically means its more expensive only becouse there is no competition.
... which sounds like something that Intel would have done just a few years ago
Still, they have ways, and CPU + mainboard combo deals are not unknown etc.
Said in a slide somewhere that "Prices are subject to change" meaning if Intel starts to threaten or if they feel there is too much negative opinions regarding the price, they could always do a a 50$ cut.
Which basically means its more expensive only becouse there is no competition.
... which sounds like something that Intel would have done just a few years ago
Still, they have ways, and CPU + mainboard combo deals are not unknown etc.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 22289
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 22289
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5841732 Posted on: 10/12/2020 12:36 PM
Well, intel ended innovation with Sandy bridge. All they did since then was tiny base/boost clock each generation and IMC capable to have faster memories.
(And added AVX2 w/ Haswell.)
Would Sandy been equipped wit equal IMC and memories as current chips clocking around 4.5GHz, it would be about equal everywhere except AVX2.
Way intel got money came from clocking down environment. Want OC? Pay for OC CPU and OC chipset. Otherwise enjoy that 100~300MHz bump from next generation and 133~267MHz higher memory clock.
I doubt AMD is going that way. They may ask more for their chips each generation. But it will come with higher performance and power efficiency.
When AM5 comes, early adopters will be paying extra for DDR5, but will get benefits of 8C/16T CPUs capable to match current 12C/24T. (And run circles around them in games.)
If you are right and performance would be that much better maybe it would be smart waiting for ddr5 and zen4 if its rumored 2021 release than spending so much for zen3.
Well, intel ended innovation with Sandy bridge. All they did since then was tiny base/boost clock each generation and IMC capable to have faster memories.
(And added AVX2 w/ Haswell.)
Would Sandy been equipped wit equal IMC and memories as current chips clocking around 4.5GHz, it would be about equal everywhere except AVX2.
Way intel got money came from clocking down environment. Want OC? Pay for OC CPU and OC chipset. Otherwise enjoy that 100~300MHz bump from next generation and 133~267MHz higher memory clock.
I doubt AMD is going that way. They may ask more for their chips each generation. But it will come with higher performance and power efficiency.
When AM5 comes, early adopters will be paying extra for DDR5, but will get benefits of 8C/16T CPUs capable to match current 12C/24T. (And run circles around them in games.)
If you are right and performance would be that much better maybe it would be smart waiting for ddr5 and zen4 if its rumored 2021 release than spending so much for zen3.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 8524
Joined: 2009-11-13
Those single thread scores make me want to have one of those for my next build.
But honestly, there's not much "cheap" about that anymore... not that I would complain about the price itself (I used to buy Intel's "enthusiast" platforms for my last two rigs anyway), but a 500€ CPU paired with a ~200€ mainboard isn't exactly what gives AMD an advantage over Intel.
But definitely, great CPUs, curiously awaiting comprehensive (gaming) benchmarks, but yeah... going for red next build.
Said in a slide somewhere that "Prices are subject to change" meaning if Intel starts to threaten or if they feel there is too much negative opinions regarding the price, they could always do a a 50$ cut.