ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
FSP Hydro G Pro 1000W (ATX 3.0, 1000W PSU) review
Addlink S90 Lite 2TB NVMe SSD review
YouTube LiveStream Shows Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 2700X to be 10% faster
On Youtube, a video was posted (Livestream) of a user showing AMD Ryzen 2700X and some results. This means that some people already have been seeded the new Zen+ processors, Pinnacle Ridge.
The video was however removed again but did seem to be the real deal. The results, however, have not been lost, as hey anything that gets out of the web, remains there. The Ryzen 7 2700X processor scored 1790 point in CineBench CB15, a Ryzen 7 1800X scores roughly 1620 points.
So that is give or take roughly a performance increase of 10%, not bad. That result was based on a default clock frequency, the guy also posted a tweaked result, showing 1891 points with all cores at 4.2 GHz.
Interesting to note is the memory latency seems to have dropped a bit, at 3200 MHz CL14 the processor's memory controllers showed a 66ns latency, that's again roughly 10%.
Check the thumbnail below.
Google to launch paid Spotify competitor Youtube Remix next year - 12/11/2017 09:57 AM
Word is out that Youtube will start to compete with Spotify and Apple Music next year with a paid music streaming service that might be called Remix. Google reportedly made a deal with Warner Mu...
Intel Releases latest HD Graphics Driver - Enables Netflix and YouTube HDR - 11/08/2017 10:58 AM
Intel today released its latest Graphics Driver for Windows v15.60 WHQL. It is compatible with most GPU embedded procs including 6th generation "Skylake," 7th generation "Kaby Lake,...
2016 model Samsung TVs to support Youtube HDR - 12/20/2016 09:50 AM
Samsung Electronics today announced that it will support YouTube’s global HDR playback on television for the first time, through an expanded version of the YouTube application. ...
Rumor: YouTube to Stream TV channels though paid subscription - 05/05/2016 03:52 AM
YouTube seems to be working hard on a paid subscription model called Unplugged that would offer customers a bundle of cable TV channels streamed over the Internet, people familiar with the plan said....
Youtube supporting 60fps uploads starting today - 10/30/2014 08:45 AM
Though Chrome only, YouTube announced that it's adding two new features that will especially benefit people who enjoy watching gameplays and those who stream games live. Most excitingly, the site ...
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5534477 Posted on: 04/03/2018 03:34 PM
Yes, that's exactly my point, and why I find it disappointing. I was hoping there'd be more of an IPC improvement. But like I said, there could be one in other benchmarks.
Doesn't it just match the bump in frequency? 1620 -> 1891 = ~15% increase, 3.6Ghz to 4.2 = ~15% increase
Yes, that's exactly my point, and why I find it disappointing. I was hoping there'd be more of an IPC improvement. But like I said, there could be one in other benchmarks.
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9797
Joined: 2011-09-21
Senior Member
Posts: 9797
Joined: 2011-09-21
#5534493 Posted on: 04/03/2018 04:41 PM
No expecting an IPC increase with this “revision” is a bit of a tall order no? I mean Ryzen is only a year old. The fact they got such a increase in frequency this soon is a great accomplishment.
Yes, that's exactly my point, and why I find it disappointing. I was hoping there'd be more of an IPC improvement. But like I said, there could be one in other benchmarks.
No expecting an IPC increase with this “revision” is a bit of a tall order no? I mean Ryzen is only a year old. The fact they got such a increase in frequency this soon is a great accomplishment.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5534501 Posted on: 04/03/2018 04:53 PM
No, it isn't a tall order. It's pretty standard, actually - just about every processor (including from ARM, PPC, MIPS, or GPUs) gets refined between each generation, especially after first generations. Skylake was pretty much the trend-breaker (where it wasn't really any different than Haswell/Broadwell other than the DDR4 support), but to be fair, it was also based on a very polished architecture. Ryzen is a great architecture but it's also the first of its generation, and it has weaknesses that could be addressed beyond its clock limitations. Even a 3% clock-per-clock improvement would be satisfactory.
I agree that this clock boost is a great accomplishment and a very welcome one, but I'm not convinced that they had nothing to tweak.
But like I said before, there's a good chance that they did actually make some small adjustments here and there that would impact other benchmarks. Ryzen is known to perform very well in Cinebench, so whatever those adjustments could be may be irrelevant to it.
No expecting an IPC increase with this “revision” is a bit of a tall order no? I mean Ryzen is only a year old. The fact they got such a increase in frequency this soon is a great accomplishment.
No, it isn't a tall order. It's pretty standard, actually - just about every processor (including from ARM, PPC, MIPS, or GPUs) gets refined between each generation, especially after first generations. Skylake was pretty much the trend-breaker (where it wasn't really any different than Haswell/Broadwell other than the DDR4 support), but to be fair, it was also based on a very polished architecture. Ryzen is a great architecture but it's also the first of its generation, and it has weaknesses that could be addressed beyond its clock limitations. Even a 3% clock-per-clock improvement would be satisfactory.
I agree that this clock boost is a great accomplishment and a very welcome one, but I'm not convinced that they had nothing to tweak.
But like I said before, there's a good chance that they did actually make some small adjustments here and there that would impact other benchmarks. Ryzen is known to perform very well in Cinebench, so whatever those adjustments could be may be irrelevant to it.
craycray
Senior Member
Posts: 168
Joined: 2015-12-18
Senior Member
Posts: 168
Joined: 2015-12-18
#5534517 Posted on: 04/03/2018 05:57 PM
1.296v for 4.2 Ghz on all 8 cores, now that is interesting to me.
1.296v for 4.2 Ghz on all 8 cores, now that is interesting to me.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 14034
Joined: 2004-05-16
Doesn't it just match the bump in frequency? 1620 -> 1891 = ~15% increase, 3.6Ghz to 4.2 = ~15% increase