Xbox Series S could have a portable form factor, SoC would be fabbed at 5nm
And that news is derived from Matt Hargett, who worked for several months as a lead engineer on the Playstation 5 team. he has made some bold statements about the Xbox Series S in response to a tweet from Tom Warren who tweeted about it's 20 CUs in that console.
According to Hargett's tweet, the console's SOC is likely fabbed at 5nm instead of 7nm. The console itself could get a portable form factor unlike the bigger size of the Playstation 5 and Xbox Series X. With the SoC fabbed at 5nm, it is likely to generate less heat gets smaller cooling or a need for it, and a smaller form factor. It is suggested that it might look similar to the Xbox One S Digital Edition, being small in size and making it easy to take to a friend's to play with, or something like that.
According to rumours, the Xbox Series S will be announced at the Xbox 20/20 event in August, so it still takes about a month and a half to see it. There we will know if all these rumours end up being true or not. Meanwhile, we recommend taking all the information with tweezers since they are rumours.
Xbox Series S Lockhart would have 7.5GB of usable ram and a 4 TFLOPs GPU - 06/27/2020 08:57 AM
the Xbox Series X development kit brings a mode that allows simulating the Xbox Series S "Lockhart", and that mode is sharing some specifications that the budget-friendly alternative of th...
Scorn "Xbox Series X" trailer actually ran on a Ryzen processor and GeForce RTX 2080 Ti - 06/01/2020 07:09 PM
Scorn, the horror FPS inspired by the works of artist and sculptor HR Giger (if you have seen any of the Aliens movies you know who he is), was airing a bit of a trailer during the latest episode of X...
Microsoft to Hold Xbox Series X Event on May 7th - 05/01/2020 09:34 AM
Microsoft is planning to show off some Xbox Series X gameplay next month. The company will hold an Inside Xbox stream on May 7th focused on games for the Xbox Series X....
Microsoft rumored to reelase an Xbox Series S In May as well - 04/23/2020 08:25 AM
You have to look back a couple of years, but in 2018 it was rumored that Microsoft was working on two next-generation consoles, a high-end one, the Xbox Series X and another cheaper version named Xb...
Crytek employee says Playstation 5 will win, Xbox Series X has bottlenecks - 04/07/2020 09:57 AM
In an interview with vigiato, Crytek rendering engineer Ali Salehi stated talked about the upcoming consoles and what it's like to develop for them, and he revealed quite some tasty remarks about the...
Senior Member
Posts: 2770
Joined: 2010-01-03
TVs have improved soo much this last few years, meanwhile on monitor land its all LCD with the usual mud coat, 1440p still expensive and 4k almost not a thing
a lot of TVs are even doing 120hz and adaptive sync for like no extra charge compared to models lacking that, its a matter of time pc users stop wasting money on second tier screens just because they are called "monitors"
the way things are going, wouldnt surprise me if at some point buying a monitor is as silly as buying "computer speakers"
Senior Member
Posts: 862
Joined: 2017-02-17
Sadly the jump to 4K was always going to be horrible for gaming, going from 1080p consoles to 4k is an insane jump in performance, considering previous generations were no where near that jump. Now 720p is kinda low, but a 1080p machine is perfectly fine for a lot of people, specially thoughs on a budget.
The bigger issue is yeah they are going to save on the console. But game prices are now going up so that will screw people over anyway. portable sounds somewhat interesting, though I have always preferred to game from home rather than outside.
Why would they buy a brand new TV just for their game console when nothing else they do is 4k.
.
hahahahahaha... not me

But in all seriousness people who are casual with tech will just get the best thing for the time that they can afford and then hold it for 5-10 years or till it breaks. Nothing wrong with this per say, and for many they don't know what they are missing becasue they haven't a clue.
My parents bought a new TV because it was bigger than the last one, but the colors were all faded and washed out. But they could not see it, just looked normal to them. If you have never seen a good high end 4k OLED then that 1080 plasma in the front room far as they are concerned is the best thing. Ignorance is bliss and good on the wallet

Senior Member
Posts: 862
Joined: 2017-02-17
TVs have improved soo much this last few years, meanwhile on monitor land its all LCD with the usual mud coat, 1440p still expensive and 4k almost not a thing
a lot of TVs are even doing 120hz and adaptive sync for like no extra charge compared to models lacking that, its a matter of time pc users stop wasting money on second tier screens just because they are called "monitors"
the way things are going, wouldnt surprise me if at some point buying a monitor is as silly as buying "computer speakers"
Yeah monitors haven't changed in a long long time, I bought my 1440p 144hz monitor a good 5/6 years ago, and they still refresh and bring it out year in year out with maybe a few software changes but often the same or similar panel. Isn't like the cost dropped either and there has been no great evolution with monitors like we used to see. TV's went and caught up and have flown by, OLED gives insane response times, can now get 120hz 4k with HDR. and sure we have a monitor by asus that does that, but you can't have all the features and if you do its like 98hz max i believe and used to cost a good 3-4k.
I'm hoping with DP 2.0 and HDMI 2.1 coming out, this might change and we get a good amount of evolution in that space. Monitors sadly have lost a lot of perks, and are often far to expensive for their price tag on what they offer in return
Senior Member
Posts: 5872
Joined: 2004-01-28
" being small in size and making it easy to take to a friend's to play with, or something like that."
The last I did that I took my SNES to my friends house who had a Genesis so we could compare which version of Mortal Kombat 2 was better. The SNES was the clear winner.
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: 2012-02-03
To be fair, 4K TVs are super cheap. Why there are even 1080p displays out there (above 32 inches anyways) as kinda crazy. And the idea that someone will spend $300 or more on a console, but not spend the same on a 4k tv (heck i see 43" 4k tvs for $170, not saying they are...good...but still) does seem a bit....odd.
People who can't afford to upgrade their older 1080p tv are likely not able to afford a new console of any kind, as well.
Realistically this S console will be for parents and grandparents who have no idea or care in the world for the differences, and will get the cheaper one and call it good for their kids.
Plenty of people will spend 1000-3000 bucks on a TV but they'll refuse to upgrade no matter what for the next 8 years. Because the TV is name brand and it still works. Why would they buy a brand new TV just for their game console when nothing else they do is 4k.
I wouldn't want a bargain bin 4k TV, most of what you're going to be viewing is going to be resized by that TV and look sub par.