Team Group MP34 NVME SSD (512GB) review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Gaming OC review
Anno 1800: PC graphics performance benchmark review
NZXT H500 Overwatch Special Edition review
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Twin Fan 6 GB Review
Corsair Carbide 275Q review
Cooler Master MK850 keyboard review
WD Blue SN500 NVME SSD (250GB) Review
ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme Alpha review
Windows 9 preview targeting a Q2 2015 release
Windows 9, codename Threshold, is rumored for an April 2015 release date. This information is known and comes from Paul Thurrott, a well-known Microsoft insider. Now, according to a new rumor, Microsoft will offer a preview version of the new operating system sometime around February of 2015. Similar to the Developer Preview or Consumer Preview of Windows 8, Microsoft is rumored to offer a public preview build of Windows 9 sometime between Q2 or Q3 of 2015 (around February or March of 2015.
This will gives consumers a chance to play with the new operating system before it's official release. This information comes from a leaker by the name of "Faikee," who was recently responsible for dropping the Windows 365 name, along with other tidbits.
The bigger question is what Windows 9 will bring to the table in terms of features. We would expect to see some integration of Cortana and naturally the Start menu will be present too. Expect the Modern UI to get updated as well but the degree of those changes are not clearly known at this time.
I think there is a possibility there will be no Windows 9, instead the next version of Windows could be Windows 8.2. I have a feeling Microsoft wants to follow Mac OSX scheme of updates. I would personally actually like if Microsoft came out with Windows 8.2 and sold it for $29.00. Then again, if Microsoft left the Windows 8 name behind and released Windows 9, it would bring positive reception.
Microsoft states there will be no more patches for Windows XP - 05/16/2014 07:33 AM
Microsoft's made a decision to issue one more security patch for Windows XP last week, but the software giant stresses this was a one time thing. Microsoft stressed this week that there will be no fu...
Microsoft extends Windows 8.1 update requirement by 30 days - 05/13/2014 07:37 AM
Users who haven't installed the first major update to Windows 8.1 now have an additional 30 days to do so, or they will no longer receive updates for the operating system. When Microsoft released Wi...
iiyama 10P1000-C-VGM Windows 8.1 Tablet - 04/14/2014 07:33 AM
iiyama is preparing to launch their newest Windows 8.1 tablet for the mass market, the 10P1000-C-VGM. Powered by a 1.58GHz Intel Celeron N2806 processor, the tablet sports a 10.1-inch 1280 x 800 multi...
Windows 8.1 gets WIMBoot and 16GB devices can have 12GB free space - 04/12/2014 09:13 AM
Microsoft announced that it has introduced a new install option for Windows 8.1 called Windows Image Boot, or WIMBoot, that's been made to allow those kinds of products a way to get a full version of...
Windows 8.1 SP1 will get full start menu again - 04/03/2014 08:08 AM
Build 2014 is Microsofts developer-focused conference, the company shared some details on Windows 8.1 Update 1, the first significant Windows update since it became available back in Octobe...
Fender178
Senior Member
Posts: 3673
Joined: 2004-09-28
Senior Member
Posts: 3673
Joined: 2004-09-28
#4821893 Posted on: 05/21/2014 03:28 PM
Right now it would be pointless for some users to switch to Windows 8.1 if they are still on old hardware such as LGA 775, 1156,1366 because of no driver support for Windows 8.1. If those users upgrade their hardware then yes Win 8.1 is a possibility.
I have a Dell Venue 8 pro tablet with Windows 8.1 and I like it. Will it help me make a decision to switch to Win 8.1 on my desktop when I upgrade my hardware I don't know.
Windows 8.1 is where its at. I was a fool to think Windows 7 was better before I switched. If you're still on windows 7, do yourself a favor and switch to 8.1. It really is better and for games its faster.
Right now it would be pointless for some users to switch to Windows 8.1 if they are still on old hardware such as LGA 775, 1156,1366 because of no driver support for Windows 8.1. If those users upgrade their hardware then yes Win 8.1 is a possibility.
I have a Dell Venue 8 pro tablet with Windows 8.1 and I like it. Will it help me make a decision to switch to Win 8.1 on my desktop when I upgrade my hardware I don't know.
shadow758
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2014-06-01
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2014-06-01
#4830534 Posted on: 06/01/2014 08:00 AM
Windows 9
I hope Windows 9 is better than Windows 8.
I will never buy or own windows 8 even if it was given to me as it looks cheap and tacky.
I have windows 7 ultimate and I'm happy with it so far
Windows 9
I hope Windows 9 is better than Windows 8.
I will never buy or own windows 8 even if it was given to me as it looks cheap and tacky.
I have windows 7 ultimate and I'm happy with it so far
HonoredShadow
Senior Member
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2007-05-27
Senior Member
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2007-05-27
#4830536 Posted on: 06/01/2014 08:08 AM
Shame as you are missing out on a better OS that is more optimised for gaming and better for your SSD. All I did was install Classic Shell and got over myself.
Shame as you are missing out on a better OS that is more optimised for gaming and better for your SSD. All I did was install Classic Shell and got over myself.
Bleib
Senior Member
Posts: 371
Joined: 2013-08-19
Senior Member
Posts: 371
Joined: 2013-08-19
#4830561 Posted on: 06/01/2014 10:16 AM
I wouldn't use 8.1 even for free. The UI is still not very mouse/keyboard desktop optimized.
I wouldn't use 8.1 even for free. The UI is still not very mouse/keyboard desktop optimized.
TheDeeGee
Senior Member
Posts: 5802
Joined: 2010-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 5802
Joined: 2010-08-28
#4830564 Posted on: 06/01/2014 10:22 AM
I'm completely skipping 8.1 aswell, seeing how many people have issues with it.
Windows 9 is my next stop, untill then it's 7.
I wouldn't use 8.1 even for free. The UI is still not very mouse/keyboard desktop optimized.
I'm completely skipping 8.1 aswell, seeing how many people have issues with it.
Windows 9 is my next stop, untill then it's 7.
Extraordinary
Senior Member
Posts: 19231
Joined: 2010-04-21
Senior Member
Posts: 19231
Joined: 2010-04-21
#4830585 Posted on: 06/01/2014 11:01 AM
The UI is exactly the same as 7 if you disable Metro
I wouldn't use 8.1 even for free. The UI is still not very mouse/keyboard desktop optimized.
The UI is exactly the same as 7 if you disable Metro
Bleib
Senior Member
Posts: 371
Joined: 2013-08-19
Senior Member
Posts: 371
Joined: 2013-08-19
#4830603 Posted on: 06/01/2014 11:33 AM
It's not. I disabled it in 8 and metro still started here and there.
The UI is exactly the same as 7 if you disable Metro
It's not. I disabled it in 8 and metro still started here and there.
Extraordinary
Senior Member
Posts: 19231
Joined: 2010-04-21
Senior Member
Posts: 19231
Joined: 2010-04-21
#4830606 Posted on: 06/01/2014 11:38 AM
Only network connections view uses Metro, the rest of the UI is 99% identical to 7
If you struggle to grasp 8.x UI but can use 7 fine, the problem is not the OS
P3BK4C
What you're saying is you can write with a pen no problems, but you struggle to write with a pencil
It's not. I disabled it in 8 and metro still started here and there.
Only network connections view uses Metro, the rest of the UI is 99% identical to 7
If you struggle to grasp 8.x UI but can use 7 fine, the problem is not the OS
P3BK4C
What you're saying is you can write with a pen no problems, but you struggle to write with a pencil
d_mouse
Senior Member
Posts: 1075
Joined: 2006-05-04
Senior Member
Posts: 1075
Joined: 2006-05-04
#4830622 Posted on: 06/01/2014 12:08 PM
Ummm no it hasn't, the Start Menu (and the Start Button for that matter) was introduced with Win 95.
*Edit*
Didn't see sykozis already pointed this out
Windows has ALWAYS had a start menu.
Ummm no it hasn't, the Start Menu (and the Start Button for that matter) was introduced with Win 95.
*Edit*
Didn't see sykozis already pointed this out
Extraordinary
Senior Member
Posts: 19231
Joined: 2010-04-21
Senior Member
Posts: 19231
Joined: 2010-04-21
#4830623 Posted on: 06/01/2014 12:11 PM
Win95 was the start of the real windows, before that was just dos with a UI mess
Ummm no it hasn't, the Start Menu (and the Start Button for that matter) was introduced with Win 95.
Win95 was the start of the real windows, before that was just dos with a UI mess
WhiteLightning
Moderator
Posts: 27591
Joined: 2007-09-19
Moderator
Posts: 27591
Joined: 2007-09-19
#4830627 Posted on: 06/01/2014 12:20 PM
imo win95 was still a dos mess, since i needed to have dos installed to install windows 95, and manually enter parameters in the startup of dos to enable devices (in windows as well).
imo win95 was still a dos mess, since i needed to have dos installed to install windows 95, and manually enter parameters in the startup of dos to enable devices (in windows as well).
d_mouse
Senior Member
Posts: 1075
Joined: 2006-05-04
Senior Member
Posts: 1075
Joined: 2006-05-04
#4830631 Posted on: 06/01/2014 12:24 PM
MSDOS was still part of the package in Win 95, 98, 98SE, and Win ME. XP was the first consumer Windows that didn't have MSDOS still packaged into it
imo win95 was still a dos mess, since i needed to have dos installed to install windows 95, and manually enter parameters in the startup of dos to enable devices (in windows as well).
MSDOS was still part of the package in Win 95, 98, 98SE, and Win ME. XP was the first consumer Windows that didn't have MSDOS still packaged into it
WhiteLightning
Moderator
Posts: 27591
Joined: 2007-09-19
Moderator
Posts: 27591
Joined: 2007-09-19
#4830632 Posted on: 06/01/2014 12:26 PM
Yes, but my point was i had to install dos on my version first because it did not detect my cd rom drive, i think it was b2 or something , not sure about that though. (in either Autoexec.bat and Config.sys, forgot which one)
MSDOS was still part of the package in Win 95, 98, 98SE, and Win ME. XP was the first consumer Windows that didn't have MSDOS still packaged into it
Yes, but my point was i had to install dos on my version first because it did not detect my cd rom drive, i think it was b2 or something , not sure about that though. (in either Autoexec.bat and Config.sys, forgot which one)
Extraordinary
Senior Member
Posts: 19231
Joined: 2010-04-21
Senior Member
Posts: 19231
Joined: 2010-04-21
#4830633 Posted on: 06/01/2014 12:27 PM
You didn't need to install dos first before installing 98se and above though
Yea 95 was a complete mess, but MS being MS, they kept up with the trend of sh1t, good, sh1t, good routine
MSDOS was still part of the package in Win 95, 98, 98SE, and Win ME. XP was the first consumer Windows that didn't have MSDOS still packaged into it
You didn't need to install dos first before installing 98se and above though
imo win95 was still a dos mess, since i needed to have dos installed to install windows 95, and manually enter parameters in the startup of dos to enable devices (in windows as well).
Yea 95 was a complete mess, but MS being MS, they kept up with the trend of sh1t, good, sh1t, good routine
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 4263
Joined: 2007-05-27
Thanks for that! Works like a 'charm'