Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 OLED monitor review
ASUS Radeon RX 7600 STRIX OC review
Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
Windows 7 Market Share on the Rise again at Steam
According to the latest data serving from Steam's hardware survey report for May 2017, Windows 10 has a steady base of 50.01% of the pie. 49.05% use the 64-bit version of the OS and 0.96% gamers which utilize the 32-bit version.
Compared to the April report this is 1.06 percentage lower compared to the statistics provided in the April 2017 report. When you peek at Windows 7, it is climbing upwards to 36.75% of surveyed gamers. And 1% is huge when you look at the total install base. Previously that was 35.42% btw. It is an interesting observation, as it really should be the other way around.
« AMD Ryzen Processors Drop in Price Significantly · Windows 7 Market Share on the Rise again at Steam
· Computex 2017: Corsair Bulldog GTO »
Microsoft unveils Windows 10 Fall Creators Update - 05/11/2017 08:19 PM
New features of the codenamed Redstone 3 update include user interface change part of what Microsoft calls Fluent Design System and Timeline functions as well as OneDrive Files On-Demand. There wi...
Microsoft Patches the "Crazy Bad" Windows Vulnerability - 05/09/2017 04:10 PM
Earlier today we reported that Google Project Zero researchers found a ‘crazy bad’ Windows RCE flaw. Microsoft apparantly took it very serious, as it likely was one of the biggest...
Google Project Zero researchers find ‘crazy bad’ Windows RCE flaw - 05/09/2017 08:24 AM
Security experts at Google Project Zero team have discovered another critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Microsoft Windows OS, but this time the hackers defined it as the worst Windo...
300 Million people now use Windows 10 Daily - 05/08/2017 07:58 AM
Bloomberg did an interview with Microsoft's vice president Yusuf Mehdi, in that interview he announced that over 300 million people use Windows 10 on a daily basis....
Windows 10 S Users Cannot Switch Default Browser or Search Engine - 05/03/2017 01:09 PM
Yesterday Microsoft announced its Windows 10 S operating system. And it is even more limited than expected. If you own a laptop with the OS installed, you cannot switch your browser to say Chrome, nei...
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 8408
Joined: 2008-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 8408
Joined: 2008-07-31
#5438635 Posted on: 06/02/2017 08:48 PM
The steam hardware survey was intended to give developers general insight into hardware trends to target optimizations. You don't need a large sampling size for that, let alone what you're advocating - sampling every single computer.
Explain to me how it is supposed to give developers any insight at all when the information isn't even remotely reliable?
For all i know my 6 year old PC that my other steam account was first put on there is still listed as a "result" since its never done the survey since then.
It doesn't do anything for developers other then to affirm "Oh hey, they do have hardware" which should be implied in the first place if they are buying your game.......
If i, as a developer, do not know what hardware people are on more often then not, then what good is the information? If the information i am being told is telling me that at one time or another, yesterday, maybe 2 years ago, maybe 10 years ago, that these systems existed, how does that help? I already knew those systems existed, and i already knew people used them, but how does that help me, now, understand what people are using, today?
It doesn't.
The steam hardware survey was intended to give developers general insight into hardware trends to target optimizations. You don't need a large sampling size for that, let alone what you're advocating - sampling every single computer.
Explain to me how it is supposed to give developers any insight at all when the information isn't even remotely reliable?
For all i know my 6 year old PC that my other steam account was first put on there is still listed as a "result" since its never done the survey since then.
It doesn't do anything for developers other then to affirm "Oh hey, they do have hardware" which should be implied in the first place if they are buying your game.......
If i, as a developer, do not know what hardware people are on more often then not, then what good is the information? If the information i am being told is telling me that at one time or another, yesterday, maybe 2 years ago, maybe 10 years ago, that these systems existed, how does that help? I already knew those systems existed, and i already knew people used them, but how does that help me, now, understand what people are using, today?
It doesn't.
airbud7
Senior Member
Posts: 7835
Joined: 2011-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 7835
Joined: 2011-07-20
#5438639 Posted on: 06/02/2017 09:04 PM
They Know...Trust Me.
They Know...Trust Me.
DLD
Senior Member
Posts: 887
Joined: 2002-09-14
Senior Member
Posts: 887
Joined: 2002-09-14
#5438645 Posted on: 06/02/2017 09:28 PM
Huh!
"...as it really should be the other way around."
There is a saying in Serbian "shto je babi milo, to joj se i snilo" (in loose translation "what the grandma is pleased with, that's what she meets in her dreams"). In this particular case, the grandma is actually a grandpa Billy...
Huh!
"...as it really should be the other way around."
There is a saying in Serbian "shto je babi milo, to joj se i snilo" (in loose translation "what the grandma is pleased with, that's what she meets in her dreams"). In this particular case, the grandma is actually a grandpa Billy...

Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 14092
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 14092
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5438648 Posted on: 06/02/2017 09:39 PM
Explain to me how it is supposed to give developers any insight at all when the information isn't even remotely reliable?
For all i know my 6 year old PC that my other steam account was first put on there is still listed as a "result" since its never done the survey since then.
It doesn't do anything for developers other then to affirm "Oh hey, they do have hardware" which should be implied in the first place if they are buying your game.......
If i, as a developer, do not know what hardware people are on more often then not, then what good is the information? If the information i am being told is telling me that at one time or another, yesterday, maybe 2 years ago, maybe 10 years ago, that these systems existed, how does that help? I already knew those systems existed, and i already knew people used them, but how does that help me, now, understand what people are using, today?
It doesn't.
Huh?
The steam hardware survey is sent out to a indeterminate number of people each month. The results of the survey are compared to the previous month. With 125M active users the sample size doesn't even have to be that large for a 95% confidence rating.
Developers then use that data to make decisions about the games they are building - not ones already sold. They can sit there with reasonable accuracy and say "The vast majority of steam users have less than 4 cores, thus we shouldn't make a game that absolutely requires 4 cores for an enjoyable experience" or "The vast majority of steam gamers are using 1080p and below" or "The vast majority of steam gamers have a 1060/480 or weaker". You don't need high levels of confidence in order to draw those conclusions and those are the conclusions valve designed it for.
Explain to me how it is supposed to give developers any insight at all when the information isn't even remotely reliable?
For all i know my 6 year old PC that my other steam account was first put on there is still listed as a "result" since its never done the survey since then.
It doesn't do anything for developers other then to affirm "Oh hey, they do have hardware" which should be implied in the first place if they are buying your game.......
If i, as a developer, do not know what hardware people are on more often then not, then what good is the information? If the information i am being told is telling me that at one time or another, yesterday, maybe 2 years ago, maybe 10 years ago, that these systems existed, how does that help? I already knew those systems existed, and i already knew people used them, but how does that help me, now, understand what people are using, today?
It doesn't.
Huh?
The steam hardware survey is sent out to a indeterminate number of people each month. The results of the survey are compared to the previous month. With 125M active users the sample size doesn't even have to be that large for a 95% confidence rating.
Developers then use that data to make decisions about the games they are building - not ones already sold. They can sit there with reasonable accuracy and say "The vast majority of steam users have less than 4 cores, thus we shouldn't make a game that absolutely requires 4 cores for an enjoyable experience" or "The vast majority of steam gamers are using 1080p and below" or "The vast majority of steam gamers have a 1060/480 or weaker". You don't need high levels of confidence in order to draw those conclusions and those are the conclusions valve designed it for.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 14092
Joined: 2004-05-16
Except that it means literally nothing. Per this months survey, it states AMDs share has gone down, which implies that Ryzen has done nothing to help. Is that correct? Maybe, its possible. Yet, at the same time, could it also be that none, or only a few ryzen systems were surveyed? More likely the latter, i have two ryzen based systems and as i said earlier i got a survey request for this PC, first time in over 12+ months, while my other PC (with a different steam account) hasn't had a request since the account was created, 6 years ago. It had a request when it was initially created, but since then, nadda.
Because of the way steam does its surveys, they are worthless and pointless. If it requested from everyone, each month, it'd have a point. Or at least, if it had YEARLY survey results, not monthly, and requested each account at some point during the year, then it would also be useful. It would be outdated, but more useful then it currently is.
The steam hardware survey was intended to give developers general insight into hardware trends to target optimizations. You don't need a large sampling size for that, let alone what you're advocating - sampling every single computer.
And no, just because AMD's maketshare dropped doesn't automatically imply Ryzen isn't helping. How many Ryzen sales came from existing AMD users? How many old AMD users jumped shipped to Intel products? What is the margin of error on the sampling size? What is the sampling size?
We don't know the answers to any of those and without the answers saying that it's "100% accurate" or it's "Useless/Worthless/Pointless" are both equally ignorant responses.