ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
Warner Bros Talks Batman Arkham Knights First patch PC
Warner Bros have been talking about the pending patch for the PC platform, after the release debacle. Below the fold fixes and details of the patch.
The new patch will be ready in a few weeks. So these will be the patch fixes:
- Reduced frame rate hitches
- Optimized system memory and VRAM usage
- Improved performance on all GPUs (requires the latest drivers)
- Min Spec AMD GPU is once again the Radeon HD 7870 2GB
- More Robust In-Game Settings, including:
- Added the ability to change settings for Max FPS to 30/60/90
- Added toggles for Motion Blur, Chromatic Aberration, and Film Grain
- Added a “High” Texture Resolution value
- Added Texture Filtering option
- Added an Adaptive V-Sync option (NVIDIA only)
- Added VRAM Usage Meter
- Added Mouse Sensitivity Slider & Mouse Smoothing Option
- Fixed low resolution texture bugs
- Fixed hitches when running on mechanical hard drives (HDD)
Lets hope that the majority of issues now is tackled, and a lesson has been learned for the future.
Warner Brothers knew about Batman issues for months already - 07/02/2015 08:24 AM
A bit of a yikes and PR nightmare for the product series, publisher Warner Brothers already new for months about the problems with Baman: Arkham Knight, but decided to move forward and release the ...
Batman Arkham Knight - Warner Bros. Suspends Game Sales for PC - 06/26/2015 09:13 AM
This release is an unfortunate mess, Warner Bros suspended future game sales of the PC version of Batman Arkham Knight, in order to address the game’s issues we already reported on yesterda...
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 4977
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 4977
Joined: 2008-09-07
#5145803 Posted on: 08/22/2015 05:05 PM
..about 90 fps..I use too a 144Hz monitor..but why some whining about it? How the heck do you think that are you going to be able to run it more than 90fps..? Oh,what,maybe looking at sky with almost none texture and other stuff rendered ?
Get reasonable, we saw how the game is and how it runs (till now), don't assume that the patch is a miracle and you'll get 1000 fps...
The 30/60/90 has to do with streaming and synching.
Yes it would be great a 30/60/90/120 but still...
Maybe some people like 144Hz and can achieve this turning off post processing effects which add nothing to the game.
I'd rather have high frame than graphical niceness - and I typically run the highest post-processing possible and start turning stuff off until I hit the frame-rate I believe is suitable for the game.
Witcher3 - 45
BF3 - 60
UT4 - infinity
..about 90 fps..I use too a 144Hz monitor..but why some whining about it? How the heck do you think that are you going to be able to run it more than 90fps..? Oh,what,maybe looking at sky with almost none texture and other stuff rendered ?
Get reasonable, we saw how the game is and how it runs (till now), don't assume that the patch is a miracle and you'll get 1000 fps...
The 30/60/90 has to do with streaming and synching.
Yes it would be great a 30/60/90/120 but still...
Maybe some people like 144Hz and can achieve this turning off post processing effects which add nothing to the game.
I'd rather have high frame than graphical niceness - and I typically run the highest post-processing possible and start turning stuff off until I hit the frame-rate I believe is suitable for the game.
Witcher3 - 45
BF3 - 60
UT4 - infinity
stereoman
Senior Member
Posts: 858
Joined: 2011-12-06
Senior Member
Posts: 858
Joined: 2011-12-06
#5145890 Posted on: 08/22/2015 10:26 PM
Not to mention the fact that GPU's advance every year so while most people wouldn't be able to hit even close to 90fps at this point what about in a year or so when the next wave of cards are released Pascal etc, to lock the frame rate at 90 ultimately limits potential performance.
Not to mention the fact that GPU's advance every year so while most people wouldn't be able to hit even close to 90fps at this point what about in a year or so when the next wave of cards are released Pascal etc, to lock the frame rate at 90 ultimately limits potential performance.
Cave Waverider
Senior Member
Posts: 1656
Joined: 2010-07-25
Senior Member
Posts: 1656
Joined: 2010-07-25
#5145911 Posted on: 08/22/2015 11:25 PM
Contrary to the headlie, this isn't the first patch for Arkham Knight. There was another one before that improved things slightly, and another undocumented one that Steam installed for some reason.
Also, one could argue that the PC version of Mortal Kombat X even had a worse launch than Arkham Knight, since many couldn't play the game at all for days after it was released due to missing files, etc.. and it took a couple of months to fix most bugs and bring the game mostly up to par with the console version feature-wise (it still isn't completely). At least Arkham Knight was "playable" for some, although it was in a bad condition nonetheless. Both are horrible console ports which WB Games arrogantly assigned to be ported to the PC in a minimal amount of time that wasn't nearly enough for a clean port by completely overwhelmed third party studios that simply aren't up to the task.
Contrary to the headlie, this isn't the first patch for Arkham Knight. There was another one before that improved things slightly, and another undocumented one that Steam installed for some reason.
Also, one could argue that the PC version of Mortal Kombat X even had a worse launch than Arkham Knight, since many couldn't play the game at all for days after it was released due to missing files, etc.. and it took a couple of months to fix most bugs and bring the game mostly up to par with the console version feature-wise (it still isn't completely). At least Arkham Knight was "playable" for some, although it was in a bad condition nonetheless. Both are horrible console ports which WB Games arrogantly assigned to be ported to the PC in a minimal amount of time that wasn't nearly enough for a clean port by completely overwhelmed third party studios that simply aren't up to the task.
xoroku
Junior Member
Posts: 19
Joined: 2012-09-18
Junior Member
Posts: 19
Joined: 2012-09-18
#5146459 Posted on: 08/24/2015 01:08 PM
They should've implemented the frame rate limit the same way as Witcher 3: 30, 60 and unlimited.
Having a limit of 90 fps doesn't make much sense for 144hz with VSync activated since you're in 24hz increments you'll end up falling back to 72 fps since you can't get to 96 fps.
They should've implemented the frame rate limit the same way as Witcher 3: 30, 60 and unlimited.
Having a limit of 90 fps doesn't make much sense for 144hz with VSync activated since you're in 24hz increments you'll end up falling back to 72 fps since you can't get to 96 fps.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1303
Joined: 2014-09-29
..about 90 fps..I use too a 144Hz monitor..but why some whining about it? How the heck do you think that are you going to be able to run it more than 90fps..? Oh,what,maybe looking at sky with almost none texture and other stuff rendered ?
Get reasonable, we saw how the game is and how it runs (till now), don't assume that the patch is a miracle and you'll get 1000 fps...
The 30/60/90 has to do with streaming and synching.
Yes it would be great a 30/60/90/120 but still...