USB 3.2 Specification Published and Announced
A while ago there was already word out on the street that the USB Focus group would be announcing a new draft for upcoming USB 3.2, that has now been finalized and published. To keep things really simple, we're doubling thing up once again.
Where USB 3.0 aka 3.1 Gen1 was capable of 5 Gbps connectivity, USB 3.1 Gen2 did 10 Gbps. USB 3.2 will double that up-towards 20 Gbps. Divide it by 8 bits and that would be 2500 MB/sec from which you need to deduct encoding and errors. There is a distinction though as it is based up-on two-lane operation as tweakers.net spotted today.
Key characteristics of the USB 3.2 solution include:
- Two-lane operation using existing USB Type-C cables
- Continued use of existing SuperSpeed USB physical layer data rates and encoding techniques
- Minor update to hub specification to address increased performance and assure seamless transitions between single and two-lane operation
So basically using two 10 Gbit/s lanes you get towards a throughput of 20 Gbps. Obviously you will need a host and client connection that is compatible with the new standard. Current USB type C cabled would be compatible if they have been certified for 10 Gbps SuperSpeed USB. If you like to do some reading, there is a 548 page document available on the new 3.2 Spec, download here.
USB version | Speed | Encoding | Connectors |
---|---|---|---|
USB 2.0 (incl usb 1.0 and 1.1) | up to 480 Mbps | 8 / 10bit | Type a, b (mini, micro), c |
USB 3.1 Gen 1 (SuperSpeed Usb) | up to 5 Gbps | 8 / 10bit | Type a, b (mini, micro), c |
USB 3.1 Gen 2 (SuperSpeed usb Gbps) | up to 10 Gbps | 128 / 130bit | Type a, b (micro), c |
USB 3.2 (SuperSpeed usb 20 Gbps) |
up to 2 lanes 5 Gbps |
128 / 130bit | Type a, b (micro), c |
Senior Member
Posts: 887
Joined: 2002-09-14
But, of course - we are saved from extinction now that we do not have to

Senior Member
Posts: 785
Joined: 2014-09-22
But, of course - we are saved from extinction now that we do not have to

I didn't even know sarcasm of this magnitude was even possible.
Senior Member
Posts: 11625
Joined: 2010-12-27
Lots of typo errors in this article.
Thought you might want to know.
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: 2014-12-27
Meanwhile PS/2 ports are still alive and well!

Senior Member
Posts: 3405
Joined: 2013-03-10
USB3 was much needed as USB2 was too slow for external HDs and was also holding back flash drives. After that I didn't really care anymore, but I have to say the Type-C connector is quite nice for a phone as there's no need to check the orientation.