Intel Core i9 9900KS processor review
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
ASUS PRIME X570 Pro review
ASUS ROG STRIX Scope keyboard review
GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 Super WTF review
ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT THICC III Ultra review
Promo: URcdkey Halloween sale Windows 10 Pro for 11$
Tom Clancys The Division graphics card performance review (updated)
We have reached the final stages of our Tom Clancy's The Division graphics card performance review. Many graphics cards have been added, we have (horrible) mGPU results, frametime FCATs as well as VRAM results added into the article over the past 24 hours. Please keep sharing your experiences in our forums of course. Most used cards anno 2016 have been tested. Both Nvidia and AMD need driver fixes for Multi-GPU gaming, that or the game engine needs an update, once released we will re-do mGPU results.
You can check out the article & its updates here.
Tom Clancys The Division GameWorks Trailer - 03/01/2016 08:55 AM
Clancy's The Division uses advance technologies to create a fully immersive New York City to life on the PC. In the video after the break some gameworks features will be shown....
NVIDIA announces new bundle with Tom Clancy The Division - 02/17/2016 02:59 PM
Mentioned a few days ago already, now confirmed. From today, 17 February, gamers who purchase a GeForce GTX 970 or above GPU or a notebook with a GeForce GTX 970M or above will receive a free copy of...
NVIDIA to Bundle Tom Clancys The Division with GeForce Graphics Cards - 02/16/2016 09:00 AM
Nvidia is prepping to release a new game bundle, this one will be very good value for money alright as the title in question is "Tom Clancy's The Division". ...
Tom Clancy The Division - Live Action Trailer - 12/19/2015 09:43 AM
When our world is on the brink of collapse, what's left for us to save "Silent Night" is the official Tom Clancy's The Division live action trailer, directed by Xavier Gens and shot in t...
Tom Clancy Rainbow Six: Siege Has Gone Gold (video) - 11/02/2015 09:07 AM
Ubisoft announced that Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege has gone gold and will launch on December 1st for the Xbox One, PlayStation 4 and PC. The final gameplay trailer in the Inside Rainbow series is ...
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12388
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12388
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5241748 Posted on: 03/08/2016 03:33 PM
Look at AMD with 0's across the board.
Who cares if they have Async, they can't even render a single frame!
Look at AMD with 0's across the board.
Who cares if they have Async, they can't even render a single frame!
Dygaza
Senior Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 2015-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 2015-05-18
#5241751 Posted on: 03/08/2016 03:36 PM
Look at AMD with 0's across the board.
Who cares if they have Async, they can't even render a single frame!
This is actually true. If I turn all options on, I can't even run benchmark as it crashes to loading, Well atleast game works just fine
Look at AMD with 0's across the board.
Who cares if they have Async, they can't even render a single frame!
This is actually true. If I turn all options on, I can't even run benchmark as it crashes to loading, Well atleast game works just fine
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12388
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12388
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5241769 Posted on: 03/08/2016 04:08 PM
That's weird -- there are other users doing benchmarks, though I haven't seen a Fury X yet.
In the beta AMD cards were faster than their Nvidia equivalents so I imagine the same will hold true for the final release. Maybe it will finally put the GameWorks nonsense to bed once and for all.
This is actually true. If I turn all options on, I can't even run benchmark as it crashes to loading, Well atleast game works just fine
That's weird -- there are other users doing benchmarks, though I haven't seen a Fury X yet.
In the beta AMD cards were faster than their Nvidia equivalents so I imagine the same will hold true for the final release. Maybe it will finally put the GameWorks nonsense to bed once and for all.
Lane
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
#5241772 Posted on: 03/08/2016 04:11 PM
That's weird -- there are other users doing benchmarks, though I haven't seen a Fury X yet.
In the beta AMD cards were faster than their Nvidia equivalents so I imagine the same will hold true for the final release. Maybe it will finally put the GameWorks nonsense to bed once and for all.
Not really, Nvidia gpu´s perf have gain around 15% when AMD one are down of 10% between Beta and final... maybe just a question of driver.
Beta > Final 1440p Ultra setting:
980TI: 51fps vs 59fps
FuryX: 59,8fps vs 55fps.
I need to base myself on 2 different reviews, so system can impact it. But well the review is only dated of the 22.02.2016 http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/the_division_beta_performance_review/7
That's weird -- there are other users doing benchmarks, though I haven't seen a Fury X yet.
In the beta AMD cards were faster than their Nvidia equivalents so I imagine the same will hold true for the final release. Maybe it will finally put the GameWorks nonsense to bed once and for all.
Not really, Nvidia gpu´s perf have gain around 15% when AMD one are down of 10% between Beta and final... maybe just a question of driver.
Beta > Final 1440p Ultra setting:
980TI: 51fps vs 59fps
FuryX: 59,8fps vs 55fps.
I need to base myself on 2 different reviews, so system can impact it. But well the review is only dated of the 22.02.2016 http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/the_division_beta_performance_review/7
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12388
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12388
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5241773 Posted on: 03/08/2016 04:13 PM
Where do you see AMD losing 10%? Most of the people over on /r/amd are reporting increased fps since the beta. I haven't seen any direct comparisons at all so it's basically just user reporting.
Nvidia gaining FPS kind of makes sense considering there wasn't a game ready driver for it during the beta. Also I'm not saying that Gameworks doesn't favor Nvidia cards, it probably does, as it probably should. But it's pretty clear that this game runs extremely well, while looking really good, despite having GameWorks in it.
Not really, Nvidia gpu´s perf have gain around 10% when AMD one are down of 10% between Beta and final... maybe just a question of HBAO or driver.
Where do you see AMD losing 10%? Most of the people over on /r/amd are reporting increased fps since the beta. I haven't seen any direct comparisons at all so it's basically just user reporting.
Nvidia gaining FPS kind of makes sense considering there wasn't a game ready driver for it during the beta. Also I'm not saying that Gameworks doesn't favor Nvidia cards, it probably does, as it probably should. But it's pretty clear that this game runs extremely well, while looking really good, despite having GameWorks in it.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36314
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36314
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5241778 Posted on: 03/08/2016 04:18 PM
If you hit refresh Fury X is already listed.
If you hit refresh Fury X is already listed.
Dygaza
Senior Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 2015-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 2015-05-18
#5241779 Posted on: 03/08/2016 04:18 PM
Not really, Nvidia gpu´s perf have gain around 15% when AMD one are down of 10% between Beta and final... maybe just a question of driver.
Beta > Final 1440p Ultra setting:
980TI: 51fps vs 59fps
FuryX: 59,8fps vs 55fps.
I need to base myself on 2 different reviews, so system can impact it. ]
We don't even know if "ultra" settings are same. Afterall it's just a name for various variables. Besides, ultra settings ain't even close to maxed settings.
Not really, Nvidia gpu´s perf have gain around 15% when AMD one are down of 10% between Beta and final... maybe just a question of driver.
Beta > Final 1440p Ultra setting:
980TI: 51fps vs 59fps
FuryX: 59,8fps vs 55fps.
I need to base myself on 2 different reviews, so system can impact it. ]
We don't even know if "ultra" settings are same. Afterall it's just a name for various variables. Besides, ultra settings ain't even close to maxed settings.
Lane
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
#5241782 Posted on: 03/08/2016 04:21 PM
Ultra should be Ultra for all, if not one setting have been added between the 22.02 and today ( in 2 weeks ).. This said, its 2 different reviewers, 2 different system, different drivers. and i had not find one other, so we will need wait other reviews.
We don't even know if "ultra" settings are same. Afterall it's just a name for various variables. Besides, ultra settings ain't even close to maxed settings.
Ultra should be Ultra for all, if not one setting have been added between the 22.02 and today ( in 2 weeks ).. This said, its 2 different reviewers, 2 different system, different drivers. and i had not find one other, so we will need wait other reviews.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12388
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12388
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5241787 Posted on: 03/08/2016 04:25 PM
Nice, thanks!
Does Ultra enable PCSS/HBAO+ though? or are those separate? I know in the beta Ultra didn't up reflections to full and it looks the same as per Hilbert's screenshots of the settings, nor does it change the object distance settings.
If you hit refresh Fury X is already listed.
Nice, thanks!
Ultra should be Ultra for all, if not one setting have been added between the 22.02 and today ( in 2 weeks ).. This said, its 2 different reviewers, 2 different system, different drivers. and i had not find one other, so we will need wait other reviews.
Does Ultra enable PCSS/HBAO+ though? or are those separate? I know in the beta Ultra didn't up reflections to full and it looks the same as per Hilbert's screenshots of the settings, nor does it change the object distance settings.
JonasBeckman
Senior Member
Posts: 15716
Joined: 2009-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 15716
Joined: 2009-02-25
#5241789 Posted on: 03/08/2016 04:28 PM
There's a new shadow quality setting, I believe the ultra preset uses high quality shadows so then there's PCSS and that new HFTS technique.
(Which it seems you can just enable by editing the config file so it's not really locked to the GeForce 900 series GPU's, it's pretty demanding though.)
Ultra should be Ultra for all, if not one setting have been added between the 22.02 and today ( in 2 weeks ).. This said, its 2 different reviewers, 2 different system, different drivers. and i had not find one other, so we will need wait other reviews.
There's a new shadow quality setting, I believe the ultra preset uses high quality shadows so then there's PCSS and that new HFTS technique.
(Which it seems you can just enable by editing the config file so it's not really locked to the GeForce 900 series GPU's, it's pretty demanding though.)
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16412
Joined: 2012-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 16412
Joined: 2012-05-18
#5241792 Posted on: 03/08/2016 04:28 PM
Thanks for review, great job!
Dygaza
If you look what ultra does in cfg screenshots you would see all is maxed
Ok except reflection medium and object distance a little lower.
Anyhu 980ti has some nice perf at 1080p, add factory oc gpu and its 90-95fps easy
Just shame the game is not that great as overall..
Thanks for review, great job!
Dygaza
If you look what ultra does in cfg screenshots you would see all is maxed
Ok except reflection medium and object distance a little lower.
Anyhu 980ti has some nice perf at 1080p, add factory oc gpu and its 90-95fps easy
Just shame the game is not that great as overall..
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36314
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36314
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5241793 Posted on: 03/08/2016 04:29 PM
Settings wise Ultra mode is 100% the same in-between the two brands, I checked that out prior to testing of course. And no it does not enable HFTS / PCSS / HBAO+ at default, it remains on the High setting
Settings wise Ultra mode is 100% the same in-between the two brands, I checked that out prior to testing of course. And no it does not enable HFTS / PCSS / HBAO+ at default, it remains on the High setting
Dygaza
Senior Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 2015-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 2015-05-18
#5241820 Posted on: 03/08/2016 05:04 PM
Thanks for review, great job!
Dygaza
If you look what ultra does in cfg screenshots you would see all is maxed
Ok except reflection medium and object distance a little lower.
Anyhu 980ti has some nice perf at 1080p, add factory oc gpu and its 90-95fps easy
Just shame the game is not that great as overall..
Also object detail on ultra is at 60%.
What I actually ment that settings in beta and final release ain't always neccessarily the same and can't be compared. For example Ultra in beta can be 16M samples, but in final release it can be 32M, and very high can be 16M samples instead.
Naturally we're talking about very short time period between last beta and final release in this game, so it's quite safe to assume they are same. But when developers do find performance improvements during betas, it's not rare to see them changing settings. Remember Normal, High, Very High and Ultra are only labels, and we don't see what's hiding behind them.
Thanks for review, great job!
Dygaza
If you look what ultra does in cfg screenshots you would see all is maxed
Ok except reflection medium and object distance a little lower.
Anyhu 980ti has some nice perf at 1080p, add factory oc gpu and its 90-95fps easy
Just shame the game is not that great as overall..
Also object detail on ultra is at 60%.
What I actually ment that settings in beta and final release ain't always neccessarily the same and can't be compared. For example Ultra in beta can be 16M samples, but in final release it can be 32M, and very high can be 16M samples instead.
Naturally we're talking about very short time period between last beta and final release in this game, so it's quite safe to assume they are same. But when developers do find performance improvements during betas, it's not rare to see them changing settings. Remember Normal, High, Very High and Ultra are only labels, and we don't see what's hiding behind them.
XenthorX
Senior Member
Posts: 2765
Joined: 2014-06-17
Senior Member
Posts: 2765
Joined: 2014-06-17
#5241821 Posted on: 03/08/2016 05:04 PM
Nvidia published beta driver 364.51 with The Division official support.
And 364.47 are NOT WHQL, nor are 364.51
Nvidia published beta driver 364.51 with The Division official support.
And 364.47 are NOT WHQL, nor are 364.51
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11862
Joined: 2008-08-28
"This article is on-going and will be updated as results come in..."
Ok, ok...i was like wtf is happening HH.
If you still doing including Kepler cards please include Tahiti GCN1.0 if you still have one around.