be quiet! Pure Rock 2 review
Fractal Design Define 7 Compact review
Lian Li Galahad 360 liquid cooler review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - July 2020
Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 3600 MHz (64GB) review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited)
Kioxia Exceria 960 GB SATA3 SSD review
HP Portable P500 1TB Portable USB3 SSD review
EK-Quantum Magnitude WaterBlock Review
Death Stranding: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Tom Clancys The Division graphics card performance review (updated)
We have reached the final stages of our Tom Clancy's The Division graphics card performance review. Many graphics cards have been added, we have (horrible) mGPU results, frametime FCATs as well as VRAM results added into the article over the past 24 hours. Please keep sharing your experiences in our forums of course. Most used cards anno 2016 have been tested. Both Nvidia and AMD need driver fixes for Multi-GPU gaming, that or the game engine needs an update, once released we will re-do mGPU results.
You can check out the article & its updates here.
Tom Clancys The Division GameWorks Trailer - 03/01/2016 09:55 AM
Clancy's The Division uses advance technologies to create a fully immersive New York City to life on the PC. In the video after the break some gameworks features will be shown....
NVIDIA announces new bundle with Tom Clancy The Division - 02/17/2016 03:59 PM
Mentioned a few days ago already, now confirmed. From today, 17 February, gamers who purchase a GeForce GTX 970 or above GPU or a notebook with a GeForce GTX 970M or above will receive a free copy of...
NVIDIA to Bundle Tom Clancys The Division with GeForce Graphics Cards - 02/16/2016 10:00 AM
Nvidia is prepping to release a new game bundle, this one will be very good value for money alright as the title in question is "Tom Clancy's The Division". ...
Tom Clancy The Division - Live Action Trailer - 12/19/2015 10:43 AM
When our world is on the brink of collapse, what's left for us to save "Silent Night" is the official Tom Clancy's The Division live action trailer, directed by Xavier Gens and shot in t...
Tom Clancy Rainbow Six: Siege Has Gone Gold (video) - 11/02/2015 10:07 AM
Ubisoft announced that Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege has gone gold and will launch on December 1st for the Xbox One, PlayStation 4 and PC. The final gameplay trailer in the Inside Rainbow series is ...
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12830
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12830
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5241748 Posted on: 03/08/2016 04:33 PM
Look at AMD with 0's across the board.
Who cares if they have Async, they can't even render a single frame!
Look at AMD with 0's across the board.
Who cares if they have Async, they can't even render a single frame!
Dygaza
Senior Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 2015-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 2015-05-18
#5241751 Posted on: 03/08/2016 04:36 PM
Look at AMD with 0's across the board.
Who cares if they have Async, they can't even render a single frame!
This is actually true. If I turn all options on, I can't even run benchmark as it crashes to loading, Well atleast game works just fine
Look at AMD with 0's across the board.
Who cares if they have Async, they can't even render a single frame!
This is actually true. If I turn all options on, I can't even run benchmark as it crashes to loading, Well atleast game works just fine
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12830
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12830
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5241769 Posted on: 03/08/2016 05:08 PM
That's weird -- there are other users doing benchmarks, though I haven't seen a Fury X yet.
In the beta AMD cards were faster than their Nvidia equivalents so I imagine the same will hold true for the final release. Maybe it will finally put the GameWorks nonsense to bed once and for all.
This is actually true. If I turn all options on, I can't even run benchmark as it crashes to loading, Well atleast game works just fine
That's weird -- there are other users doing benchmarks, though I haven't seen a Fury X yet.
In the beta AMD cards were faster than their Nvidia equivalents so I imagine the same will hold true for the final release. Maybe it will finally put the GameWorks nonsense to bed once and for all.
Lane
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 6361
Joined: 2005-02-25
#5241772 Posted on: 03/08/2016 05:11 PM
That's weird -- there are other users doing benchmarks, though I haven't seen a Fury X yet.
In the beta AMD cards were faster than their Nvidia equivalents so I imagine the same will hold true for the final release. Maybe it will finally put the GameWorks nonsense to bed once and for all.
Not really, Nvidia gpu´s perf have gain around 15% when AMD one are down of 10% between Beta and final... maybe just a question of driver.
Beta > Final 1440p Ultra setting:
980TI: 51fps vs 59fps
FuryX: 59,8fps vs 55fps.
I need to base myself on 2 different reviews, so system can impact it. But well the review is only dated of the 22.02.2016 http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/the_division_beta_performance_review/7
That's weird -- there are other users doing benchmarks, though I haven't seen a Fury X yet.
In the beta AMD cards were faster than their Nvidia equivalents so I imagine the same will hold true for the final release. Maybe it will finally put the GameWorks nonsense to bed once and for all.
Not really, Nvidia gpu´s perf have gain around 15% when AMD one are down of 10% between Beta and final... maybe just a question of driver.
Beta > Final 1440p Ultra setting:
980TI: 51fps vs 59fps
FuryX: 59,8fps vs 55fps.
I need to base myself on 2 different reviews, so system can impact it. But well the review is only dated of the 22.02.2016 http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/the_division_beta_performance_review/7
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 13097
Joined: 2008-08-28
"This article is on-going and will be updated as results come in..."
Ok, ok...i was like wtf is happening HH.
If you still doing including Kepler cards please include Tahiti GCN1.0 if you still have one around.