Tick Tock Tock Says Intel Now As Well
The familiar "Tick-Tock" is a model used by chip manufacturer Intel Corporation start started in 2007 to follow every micro-architectural change with a die shrink of the process technology. Based on Moore's Law this been proven to become more and more difficult, it's becoming Tick-Tock-Tock
Earlier this year we already reported that starting with Kaby Lake things would to be changing as the cycle changes towards two tocks.
Now if this sounds like gibberish to you allow me to explain; every "tick" represents a shrinked process technology based on the previous micro-architecture (sometimes introducing new things like instructions, as with Broadwell, released in late 2014) and every "tock" designates a new micro-architecture. Roughly every year to 18 months, there was expected to be one tick or tock. Examples: Haswell (22nm Tock, LGA-2011, high-end), Broadwell (14nm Tick, LGA-1150, mainstream) and Skylake (14nm Tock, LGA-1150, mainstream).
In it's yearly Form 10-K document about Intel's financials the company now really makes note of a three-step cycle. So after a new procedure (die shrink), there will be a new architecture followed by an upgrade of that architecture. This way Intel can release a new processor each year.
We are now at Skylake, which will be followed by Kabylake and Cannonlake. After Cannon lake we'll see Icelake and Tiger Lake.
Microarchitecture | CPU series | Tick or Tock | Cycle | Fab node | Year Released |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Presler/Cedar Mill | Pentium 4 / D | Tick | 65 nm | 2006 | |
Conroe/Merom | Core 2 Duo/Quad | Tock | 65 nm | 2006 | |
Penryn | Core 2 Duo/Quad | Tick | 45 nm | 2007 | |
Nehalem | Core i | Tock | 45 nm | 2008 | |
Westmere | Core i | Tick | 32 nm | 2010 | |
Sandy Bridge | Core i 2xxx | Tock | 32 nm | 2011 | |
Ivy Bridge | Core i 3xxx | Tick | 22 nm | 2012 | |
Haswell | Core i 4xxx | Tock | 22 nm | 2013 | |
Broadwell | Core i 5xxx | Tick | Process | 14 nm | 2014 & 2015 for desktops |
Skylake | Core i 6xxx | Tock | Architecture | 14 nm | 2015 |
Kaby lake | Core i 7xxx | Tock | Optimization | 14 nm | 2016 |
Cannonlake | Core i 8xxx? | Tick | Process | 10 nm | 2017 |
Icelake | Core i 8xxx? | Tock | Architecture | 10 nm | 2018 |
Tiger Lake | Core i 9xxx? | Tock | Optimization | 10 nm | 2019 |
tba | tba | Tick | Process | 7 nm | 2020 |
Intel started rolling out its 14nm "Skylake" processors last autumn, the 10nm "Cannonlake" chips were originally planned to be the follow-up. However, Intel will release Kaby lake likely in the 2nd half of 2016. Kaby lake will be based on Skylake and will offer better performance (architecture update).
Effectively this means we will see three families of 14nm Intel chips: Broadwell from 2014, Skylake in 2015, and Kaby Lake in late 2016. The 10nm Cannonlake parts will follow in 2017. The 10nm products under code-name Cannonlake will be released 2nd half of 2017.
Intel by the way is stepping away from the somewhat goofy sounding Tick-Tick-Tock naming, it'll be Process <-> architecture <-> optimization. Around 2020/2021 we should see 7nm ...
Senior Member
Posts: 1528
Joined: 2012-10-07
at this rate AMD will surely catch up, its like there's now a relative performance barrier, so AMD gets there and all they can do is a war on prices until some miracle removes the barrier
maybe in the mean time we get some overdue upgrades like 10gbit networking as standard
Yeah, interesting idea.
Senior Member
Posts: 7026
Joined: 2006-09-24
It's ok. AMD can play catch up on the process size. They were stuck on the 28/32nm for way too long, when Intel was soldiering on to 22nm and 14nm. AMD was left in dust in energy efficiency simply because of that already.
Senior Member
Posts: 319
Joined: 2015-09-17
you and me both, arent we from the same year?! How bout we go up this christmas

Senior Member
Posts: 588
Joined: 2009-03-27
they simply want to stay on the same node for longer.. this will give them more time to go for smaller transistors.. its a hard process now.. and since there is no big challenge from amd they are feeling free
Senior Member
Posts: 2659
Joined: 2010-01-03
at this rate AMD will surely catch up, its like there's now a relative performance barrier, so AMD gets there and all they can do is a war on prices until some miracle removes the barrier
maybe in the mean time we get some overdue upgrades like 10gbit networking as standard