Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review

New Downloads
GeForce 461.81 hotfix driver download
ClockTuner for Ryzen (CTR) v2.0 RC4 Download
SiSoft Sandra 20/21 download v31.12
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9316
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5644 beta
FurMark Download v1.25
MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Final Stable Download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.7
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.0 Final
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download


New Forum Topics
New Upcoming ATI/AMD GPU's Thread: Leaks, Hopes & Aftermarket GPU's [Mod Driver] NimeZ Radeon Software - Signature Edition More Rocket Lake-S Gaming Benchmarks leak small differences Only Nvidia maximum power settings (per game) sometimes doesn't work.3080 Driver 457.51 3080 tuf OC ed. Same stutter in apex once/twice a game (w/frametimegraph) 3090 Owner's thread w10 defragging/trimming (both)my SSD on scheduled?w10 19042.804 EPYC Gen 3 with Zen3 cores to be announced March 15th My experience with 4-way Sli thus far SK Hynix Fires Up Volume Production of 18-Gigabyte LPDDR5 Mobile DRAM Chips




Guru3D.com » News » The Witcher III Wild Hunt VGA Performance review

The Witcher III Wild Hunt VGA Performance review

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 05/20/2015 01:52 PM | source: | 116 comment(s)

In this article we benchmark The Witcher III on the PC - many graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.

Read the performance overview right here.
 







« The Witcher 3 Wild Hunt free for Titan X owners · The Witcher III Wild Hunt VGA Performance review · OCZ Z-Drive 6000 NVMe SSD »

Related Stories

The Witcher 3 Wild Hunt free for Titan X owners - 05/20/2015 10:54 AM
Own a Titan GeForce GTX TITAN X and want The Witcher 3 Wild Hunt for free ? Nvidia is running a promotions, just install GeForce Experience and you can redeem a coupon code eligible for Steam....

The Witcher 3 Benchmarks - 05/19/2015 01:11 PM
Some media had pre-release materials available to produce benchmark results for Witcher 3. Below the fold an overview....

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Go Your Way (videos) - 05/19/2015 04:23 AM
CD Projekt RED has released the launch trailer for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ahead of the game's release tomorrow. The trailer is impressively cut and is heavy on the emotions. The Witcher 3: Wild ...

The Witcher 3 4K Ultra Settings Video - 05/17/2015 08:01 AM
There's a youtube video available on the Witcher 3, it demo's the game running in Ultra High resolution (Ultra HD). Though this likely is not the final version with extra graphics enhancements, at U...

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ScreenShots - 05/04/2015 07:26 AM
CD Projekt RED has released six new screenshots from The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is an upcoming action role-playing video game set in an open world environment, that is current...


24 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Undying
Senior Member



Posts: 14946
Joined: 2008-08-28

#5076135 Posted on: 05/20/2015 01:56 PM
Nice review HH, like always. I was just expecting you do HW/off benchmark to compare. Its really taxing the AMD hardware. One of the articles said 290 is 77% faster with HW/off.

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 40330
Joined: 2000-02-22

#5076138 Posted on: 05/20/2015 02:00 PM
I'll have a look tomorrow, Hairworks is a NV feature and was disabled for fair comparison. This article is work in progress and I wanted the initials number out.

Basically I was waiting (hoping) on AMD for a driver ... but well.

Denial
Senior Member



Posts: 13235
Joined: 2004-05-16

#5076140 Posted on: 05/20/2015 02:01 PM
Nice review HH, like always. I was just expecting you do HW/off benchmark to compare. Its really taxing the AMD hardware. One of the articles said 290 is 77% faster with HW/off.


HW is off for the test.

Everything is set to Ultra, AA is enabled, Nvidia Hairworks is disabled and we use SSAO. The graphics cards used in this specific article are:


Oh, are you just asking for a comparison?



980 is 40% faster than a 780Ti in the QHD test compared to the 10-15% when the 980 launched. Nvidia posted on their forums that they are looking into it. I wonder if a 6GB 780Ti would perform better in the test? Also seems weird that the 780Ti only performs ~8% better than a 780. I wonder if it's a driver bug or something with the 780Ti

Dorlor
Senior Member



Posts: 1708
Joined: 2014-01-23

#5076142 Posted on: 05/20/2015 02:02 PM
Aaaand yet another benchmark that shows what all other benchmarks has shown - kepler having been seriously downgraded (intentional or accidental - im leaning towards intentional).

Some people claim its simply because Maxwell has been optimized, but if that was the case, then a gtx 980 should be MILES ahead of a 290x, and a 780 ti should still be on par with the 290x, but it isnt.

The gtx 980 is a tad ahead of the 290x as usual, while the 780 ti is waaaaay behind the 290x - the same can be seen with all the other kepler Cards, with the 780 almost performing the same as a freaking 960...

Denial
Senior Member



Posts: 13235
Joined: 2004-05-16

#5076153 Posted on: 05/20/2015 02:20 PM
Aaaand yet another benchmark that shows what all other benchmarks has shown - kepler having been seriously downgraded (intentional or accidental - im leaning towards intentional).

Some people claim its simply because Maxwell has been optimized, but if that was the case, then a gtx 980 should be MILES ahead of a 290x, and a 780 ti should still be on par with the 290x, but it isnt.

The gtx 980 is a tad ahead of the 290x as usual, while the 780 ti is waaaaay behind the 290x - the same can be seen with all the other kepler Cards, with the 780 almost performing the same as a freaking 960...

Idk, honestly I'd like to see a 980's 3DMark scores over the last several driver releases.

I mean basically it seems like Maxwell on average is performing 20% faster than it was at launch. At launch a 980 was on average about 10-15% faster then a 780Ti. Now it seems like it's about 30-40% faster then a 780Ti in most recently released games.

A 960 was also about 20% slower then a 780. Now it seems like a 960 is about 2-5% slower.

The only real way to see if Nvidia is "downgrading" performance is to either A. Show me a driver where a Kepler series card performs 20% slower.

Or

B. Show me the 3DMark/Any Benchmark between release drivers of Maxwell and current drivers of Maxwell.

I think more than likely Maxwell is just getting the better end of the deal with drivers. Driver improvements slowed with Kepler by the time it was finished anyway. The 680 showed a 25% increase in performance from drivers over it' lifetime. 780 only showed a ~8-10% increase during it's lifetime. It's pretty clear that Kepler performance was maxed.

Regardless, ManuelG posted on the Nvidia forums that the driver teams are looking into it. So if there is an issue I'm sure it will be corrected.

24 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021