Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
FSP Hydro G Pro 1000W (ATX 3.0, 1000W PSU) review
The AMD Ryzen 7000 (Zen4) Series Retail Box Has Been Revealed
And there it is, a package for Ryzen 9 7000-series shown. It displays a sturdy cardboard box with a window in the middle showing the processor.
The front displays a dark AMD Arrow logo and CPU window. Side has Ryzen motif with "9" brand extension. The Ryzen 9 7000-series box has a tray-type design with sliding sides. Ryzen 7 7000-series and Ryzen 5 7000-series may arrive in a paperboard package. The source of this graphic told VideoCardz that the Ryzen 7 7700X will start for $299 SEP. The 7800X might cost more than the 5800X launch SEP, or $399. Ryzen 9 7900X and 7950X may cost more than 5900X and 5950X.
| Alledged Ryzen 7000 Specifications | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | Base/Boost Clock | TDP | Cache (L2+L3) | Launch Price(USD) | |
| AMD Ryzen 7000 Zen4 Raphael | |||||
| Ryzen 9 7950X | 16C/32T | 4.5/5.7 GHz | 170W | 80MB (16+64) | 799+ USD |
| Ryzen 9 7900X | 12C/24T | 4.7/5.6 GHz | 170W | 76MB (12+64) | 549+ USD |
| Ryzen 7 7800X (?) | - | - | - | - | 449+ USD |
| Ryzen 7 7700X | 8C/16T | 4.5/5.4 GHz | 105W | 40MB (8+32) | 299 USD |
| Ryzen 5 7600X | 6C/12T | 4.7/5.3 GHz | 105W | 38MB (6+32) | - |
| AMD Ryzen 5000 Zen3 Vermeer | |||||
| Ryzen 9 5950X | 16C/32T | 3.4/4.9 GHz | 105W | 72MB (8+64) | 799 USD |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | 12C/24T | 3.7/4.8 GHz | 105W | 70MB (4+64) | 549 USD |
| Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 8C/16T | 3.4/4.5 GHz | 105W | 100MB (4+96) | 449 USD |
| Ryzen 7 5800X | 8C/16T | 3.8/4.7 GHz | 105W | 36MB (4+32) | 449 USD |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | 8C/16T | 3.4/4.6 GHz | 65W | 36MB (4+32) | 299 USD |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | 6C/12T | 3.7/4.6 GHz | 65W | 35MB (3+32) | 299 USD |
A Listing Indicates the Arrival of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT - 04/13/2022 10:34 AM
A file with South Korea's National Radio Research Agency (RRA), which certifies gear marketed globally, implies that AMD's Radeon RX 6750 XT may be on the way....
On Sale starting October 13th, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 - 09/22/2021 08:52 AM
Of course, that's the non XT model. Materials obtained by VideoCardz indicate the AMD Radeon RX 6600 graphics card is scheduled to ship in October. ...
ASRock has released the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger ITX 8GB graphics card (compact) - 08/27/2021 08:42 AM
This Radeon RX 6600 XT is a small form factor graphics card with a big striped axial fan VGA cooler. Equipped with its own "Challenger ITX cooler," the overall depth is reduced to 179mm....
Geekbench score: Intel Core i9-12900K outperforms the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. - 08/27/2021 08:24 AM
A few days ago you have seen Intel Core i7-12700 appearing on Geekbench 5, where it competed and matches the AMD Ryzen 7 5800Xnow the Core i9-12900K has been spotted, the company's flagship processor...
ASUS Introduces the AMD X570 STRIX-E, ProArt Creator, and TUF Pro Motherboards - 08/14/2021 10:10 AM
ASUS today introduced three new motherboards based on AMD's X570 chipset, joining the ROG Crosshair VIII Extreme as ASUS's latest X570 offerings....
cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 7383
Joined: 2020-08-03
Senior Member
Posts: 7383
Joined: 2020-08-03
#6042178 Posted on: 08/14/2022 10:56 PM
doubt we'll be seeing ~$200 midrange cpus ever again to be frank
12400f is 170eur, latest generation 6c/12t
doubt we'll be seeing ~$200 midrange cpus ever again to be frank
12400f is 170eur, latest generation 6c/12t
user1
Senior Member
Posts: 2420
Joined: 2016-01-29
Senior Member
Posts: 2420
Joined: 2016-01-29
#6042183 Posted on: 08/14/2022 11:17 PM
Question. Is that midrange? or is it budget/entry level, I'd tend to put it in the lowend , even if the performance is pretty good, since its quite literally a cost reduced variant of alderlake with no e-cores (not just disabled).
Edit: I will add that my general view when I think about what classification a cpu should be given, is using historical precedent, which is pretty consistent over generations . usually midrange cpus sit in the 70-80% of the performance of the High end chip. and if its below 50% , then its entry level.
ie with sandy bridge the 2500k is~ 83% the peformance of the the 2600k. the 6600k being 74% of the 6700k, the fx6300 being 76% of the fx 8350 ect. granted that the cpu market isn't the same as it used to be, with the huge numbers of cores, but if we apply this standard, then we see the that the 12400f is roughly 52% of the performance of the 12700k, and just 42% of the 12900k. by comparison the 12600k sits at 79%(12700l) and 63% (12900k) , so the 12400f sits in the lowend by this metric.
used cinebench 11.5 for the older chips(6700k and older), and r23 for the numbers on the newer ones
12400f is 170eur, latest generation 6c/12t
Question. Is that midrange? or is it budget/entry level, I'd tend to put it in the lowend , even if the performance is pretty good, since its quite literally a cost reduced variant of alderlake with no e-cores (not just disabled).
Edit: I will add that my general view when I think about what classification a cpu should be given, is using historical precedent, which is pretty consistent over generations . usually midrange cpus sit in the 70-80% of the performance of the High end chip. and if its below 50% , then its entry level.
ie with sandy bridge the 2500k is~ 83% the peformance of the the 2600k. the 6600k being 74% of the 6700k, the fx6300 being 76% of the fx 8350 ect. granted that the cpu market isn't the same as it used to be, with the huge numbers of cores, but if we apply this standard, then we see the that the 12400f is roughly 52% of the performance of the 12700k, and just 42% of the 12900k. by comparison the 12600k sits at 79%(12700l) and 63% (12900k) , so the 12400f sits in the lowend by this metric.
used cinebench 11.5 for the older chips(6700k and older), and r23 for the numbers on the newer ones
mackintosh
Senior Member
Posts: 958
Joined: 2012-11-28
Senior Member
Posts: 958
Joined: 2012-11-28
#6042196 Posted on: 08/15/2022 12:16 AM
Depends on whether you think the 5600X is a budget low-end CPU.
Depends on whether you think the 5600X is a budget low-end CPU.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 21191
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 21191
Joined: 2008-08-28
#6042203 Posted on: 08/15/2022 01:20 AM
More like mid range cpu while 5500 and 5600 non x being lower end.
Depends on whether you think the 5600X is a budget low-end CPU.
More like mid range cpu while 5500 and 5600 non x being lower end.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2420
Joined: 2016-01-29
well to be fair $300 is likely to be the the new $200 pretty soon, if we look at how inflation is accumulating over the last couple years.
if we take the 7600x at 330usd and put that in 2012 dollars , its around $273, which about $38 less than a 3770k or $50 more than a 3570k would cost at the time, and when you take into account increased process node cost, manufacturing complexity , increased energy costs, material costs ect, It really isn't all that far off what you would expect for a midrange cpu to cost. seems fairly reasonable IMO.
doubt we'll be seeing ~$200 midrange cpus ever again to be frank, It will only get worse as the money supply continues to balloon and the number of goods continues to stay the same or contract.