Gigabyte Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC review
Corsair K70 RGB TKL keyboard review
Corsair RM650x (2021) power supply review
be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280mm review
Corsair K55 RGB PRO XT keyboard review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - March 2021
Intel Core i9-11900K processor review
Intel Core i5-11600K processor review
ASUS ROG Maximus XIII HERO review
MSI MEG Z590 ACE review
Supermicro to further investigate Chinese espionage chips on their hardware
After the devastating article from Bloomberg, Supermicro will check its products for the presence of malicious chips. The investigation follows the publication of a controversial article stating that the Supermicro production chain would have been infiltrated by China.
"Despite the lack of evidence for the existence of a malicious chip, we carry out an extensive and time-consuming assessment," Supermicro has told its customers. The company also denies the accusation. Bloomberg published an article on October 4 in which it wrote that China would have placed microchips on Supermicro's motherboards. These products would then have ended up at thirty US companies, including Apple and Amazon.
Both companies deny the allegations.
Apple CEO Tim Cook even called on Bloomberg to withdraw the article, something the company has never done publicly before. American and British authorities also said they knew nothing about the alleged infiltration. Bloomberg has used seventeen anonymous sources for his story according to his own statements, and they remain behind his publication. Until even this moment it has not come up with additional evidence. If Bloomberg is wrong, they might have sunk SMC into a pending bankruptcy, if they are right then perhaps that is rightfully so. The CEOs of Amazon and chipmaker Supermicro, following Apple CEO Tim Cook, call for the withdrawal of the Bloomberg article about alleged espionage chips in Supermicro hardware.
Apple CEO Tim Cook called Friday in an interview with BuzzFeed News to withdraw the story, for the first time the company does something like that.
'No proof, no interest in answers'
Cook receives support from Supermicro CEO Charles Liang, who also calls for the retraction of the story. " Bloomberg has not shown any affected motherboard, we have no malicious components in our products, we have not been contacted by the government and no customer has reported malicious hardware to us," Liang said. Amazon Web Services CEO Andy Jassy also calls for the retraction of the story. "Tim Cook is right, they do not provide proof, the story keeps changing, they were not interested in our answers unless they confirmed their theories," Jassy writes on Twitter . "Bloomberg should pull it back."
Supermicro along with Apple and Amazon refute claims in Bloomberg story - 10/05/2018 08:59 AM
Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI), a global leader in enterprise computing, storage, networking solutions and green computing technology, strongly refutes reports that servers it sold to customers con...
SuperMicro to release two Supero X299 motherboards (updated) - 06/02/2017 05:03 PM
Supermicro presented its C7X299-PG at the IT trade show Computex in Taiwan. Much like all Intel board partners Supermicro is cooking up something nice as well. And I do say nice with a reason, as prev...
Review: SuperMicro C7Z270-CG Motherboard - 01/19/2017 10:51 AM
It is the era of the Z270 schipset, and in this article we cover the SuperMicro C7Z270-CG review. It is advertised as a server grade motherboard, but will it deliver in performance, features and aesth...
Review: SuperMicro C7Z170-SQ motherboard - 11/03/2015 10:08 AM
In this review we look at a SuperMicro C7Z170-SQ motherboard from their new Gaming series. SMC is predominantly active in the server market, however they have a new gaming line of consumer grade mainb...
SPARKLE CalibreCUTi Supermicro Computer - 01/19/2010 01:28 PM
Sparkle announced the Calibre CUTi, a revolutionary small form factor PC providing high definition 1080p playback and digital surround sound for a variety of multimedia formats displayed right on a us...
tunejunky
Senior Member
Posts: 1223
Joined: 2017-08-18
Senior Member
Posts: 1223
Joined: 2017-08-18
#5599484 Posted on: 10/23/2018 11:59 PM
Reminds me of a news article I saw somewhere a while back: The Chinese had hacked into a thinktanks servers and been actively perusing and stealing their IP for about a year, this intrusion was discovered finally and stopped.... the Chinese were so incensed at this that they DDoS's the thinktank's servers lol
They have hacked so many universities and companies to steal data it is just not a surprise anymore.
lol
i use a burner cell when i'm there because they monitor every frequency and often have backdoors, particularly Huawei
Reminds me of a news article I saw somewhere a while back: The Chinese had hacked into a thinktanks servers and been actively perusing and stealing their IP for about a year, this intrusion was discovered finally and stopped.... the Chinese were so incensed at this that they DDoS's the thinktank's servers lol
They have hacked so many universities and companies to steal data it is just not a surprise anymore.
lol
i use a burner cell when i'm there because they monitor every frequency and often have backdoors, particularly Huawei
Koniakki
Senior Member
Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15
Senior Member
Posts: 2843
Joined: 2009-09-15
#5599492 Posted on: 10/24/2018 12:16 AM
With my specially made shiny and secure hat on, I would say IF this story turns to have any truth in it and indeed SMC was infiltrated, I bet it is specific server board batches, intended for specific servers that they were interested in, would be my guess.
That's why it could be hard to confirm its existence, since it might be only some specific boards that might or might not be affected, if the story holds some truth in it of course.
With my specially made shiny and secure hat on, I would say IF this story turns to have any truth in it and indeed SMC was infiltrated, I bet it is specific server board batches, intended for specific servers that they were interested in, would be my guess.
That's why it could be hard to confirm its existence, since it might be only some specific boards that might or might not be affected, if the story holds some truth in it of course.
sykozis
Senior Member
Posts: 21798
Joined: 2008-07-14
Senior Member
Posts: 21798
Joined: 2008-07-14
#5599531 Posted on: 10/24/2018 04:35 AM
1) when a news organization has 17 sources and corroboration from two gov'ts (U.K. & U.S.)
and does not "show the evidence", it is not from a lack of evidence, it's from national security.
Not a single one of their "anonymous sources" have been confirmed by anyone but Bloomberg.
This "corroboration from two gov'ts" doesn't seem to hold up as both Gov'ts have stated that they have ZERO knowledge of the claims.
Bloomberg has refused to provide any data to SuperMicro, Amazon or Apple. If the story was ligitimate, they wouldn't have a problem doing so. Even the security firm that did the audit of the systems says the story is a load of crap.
When a "news" organization sites numerous "anonymous" sources and refuses to provide any evidence to support the claim to anyone, be it readers or the supposedly affected organizations, the story is fake.
You can spout your Anti-China rhetoric all you want, but until Bloomberg provides actual evidence of their claims or provides the name of these supposed "anonymous sources", there's no reason to believe anything they print.
1) when a news organization has 17 sources and corroboration from two gov'ts (U.K. & U.S.)
and does not "show the evidence", it is not from a lack of evidence, it's from national security.
Not a single one of their "anonymous sources" have been confirmed by anyone but Bloomberg.
This "corroboration from two gov'ts" doesn't seem to hold up as both Gov'ts have stated that they have ZERO knowledge of the claims.
Bloomberg has refused to provide any data to SuperMicro, Amazon or Apple. If the story was ligitimate, they wouldn't have a problem doing so. Even the security firm that did the audit of the systems says the story is a load of crap.
When a "news" organization sites numerous "anonymous" sources and refuses to provide any evidence to support the claim to anyone, be it readers or the supposedly affected organizations, the story is fake.
You can spout your Anti-China rhetoric all you want, but until Bloomberg provides actual evidence of their claims or provides the name of these supposed "anonymous sources", there's no reason to believe anything they print.
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 12156
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 12156
Joined: 2014-07-21
#5599547 Posted on: 10/24/2018 07:42 AM
1) when a news organization has 17 sources and corroboration from two gov'ts (U.K. & U.S.)
and does not "show the evidence", it is not from a lack of evidence, it's from national security.
2) the Pentagon (esp DARPA), has been aware of the problem of offshore manufacturing and the guaranteed penetration by state actors ever since businesses started going to China.
3) other than the technical aspects of this story, anybody who doesn't believe China has spies in every manufacturing plant is both foolish and naive and they've never been to China.
4) Supermicro is doing precisely the right thing - put on a brave face, deny everything but investigate thoroughly.
1. might be or might not be, sources not made available might still be made up, ESPECIALLY when it's government sources and interests beyond security, such as trade wars (you notice where I'm going?) are a thing. Like tariffs because of "national security" which is utter rubbish also.
2. if they know, warned, cried, why did they never impose a law that they need to have manufacturing in the US if companies want to supply to the government in the first place? It's not like the US would not need enough hardware with the "war on terror" that in the last 17 years nobody could have built a plant there, if the so smart goverment and three letter organisations are so sure that something's happening in China.
3. oh I do believe they have spies there. You think the US haven't gotten spies in China that are supposed to make sure nothing goes wrong with what the US need from over there? If not, why not? Have you ever been to China, I'm asking out of curiosity?
4. Supermicro was never the issue there, but more likely Bloomberg bringing out a story that not only destroys company's worth, but also actively works against any counter intelligency trying to catch the people responsible for such placements of "control" chips in hardware that's targeted to be compromised. If somebody really was trying to catch the people responsible for such an issue, it would only be logical to NOT say anything about it until AFTER they solved the issue. If not, they're trusting on the Chinese "infiltrators" to stop their doing just because somebody said they're doing it. To believe that would also be naive.
1) when a news organization has 17 sources and corroboration from two gov'ts (U.K. & U.S.)
and does not "show the evidence", it is not from a lack of evidence, it's from national security.
2) the Pentagon (esp DARPA), has been aware of the problem of offshore manufacturing and the guaranteed penetration by state actors ever since businesses started going to China.
3) other than the technical aspects of this story, anybody who doesn't believe China has spies in every manufacturing plant is both foolish and naive and they've never been to China.
4) Supermicro is doing precisely the right thing - put on a brave face, deny everything but investigate thoroughly.
1. might be or might not be, sources not made available might still be made up, ESPECIALLY when it's government sources and interests beyond security, such as trade wars (you notice where I'm going?) are a thing. Like tariffs because of "national security" which is utter rubbish also.
2. if they know, warned, cried, why did they never impose a law that they need to have manufacturing in the US if companies want to supply to the government in the first place? It's not like the US would not need enough hardware with the "war on terror" that in the last 17 years nobody could have built a plant there, if the so smart goverment and three letter organisations are so sure that something's happening in China.
3. oh I do believe they have spies there. You think the US haven't gotten spies in China that are supposed to make sure nothing goes wrong with what the US need from over there? If not, why not? Have you ever been to China, I'm asking out of curiosity?
4. Supermicro was never the issue there, but more likely Bloomberg bringing out a story that not only destroys company's worth, but also actively works against any counter intelligency trying to catch the people responsible for such placements of "control" chips in hardware that's targeted to be compromised. If somebody really was trying to catch the people responsible for such an issue, it would only be logical to NOT say anything about it until AFTER they solved the issue. If not, they're trusting on the Chinese "infiltrators" to stop their doing just because somebody said they're doing it. To believe that would also be naive.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 960
Joined: 2009-10-14
in every newspaper or news program of any repute three independent sources are required.
whistle-blowing in particular, often means anonymity because of the power differential between a person and a group/company/corporation/nation.
when you add in the known behavior of Chinese industrial and military espionage, costing billions of dollars in Intellectual Property to leapfrog from second world status to first, why is anyone surprised at anything?
i've only said i wasn't surprised by the Bloomberg story as it is entirely credible if you've ever been to China. i've been to China and Hong Kong many times, as in more than 10. and the strong-arm tactics of the gov't re: business and IP is well known and a company is forced to transfer some technology in order to be there in the first place. whether you're General Motors, Supermicro, Apple, et al... or not.
this alleged event wasn't for that technology transfer - they have that, it was to target the end user. totalitarian states are totalitarian, so "free discourse/data/information" is antithetical to the state. the Chinese are already the most surveilled people on the face of the earth (as are the visitors there...if you look you can find the minders). why the surprise they want to gather every bit of information that they can?
Reminds me of a news article I saw somewhere a while back: The Chinese had hacked into a thinktanks servers and been actively perusing and stealing their IP for about a year, this intrusion was discovered finally and stopped.... the Chinese were so incensed at this that they DDoS's the thinktank's servers lol
They have hacked so many universities and companies to steal data it is just not a surprise anymore.